Jump to content

Articling Recruit

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Just curious if anyone has heard from the schools about whether the upcoming articling recruit may be virtual again? 


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt the law societies are planning that far ahead rn, if you plan on seeking articling in Ontario (judging by your post history as a Western student) here's the page with recruitment procedure details which I'm sure will be updated when they are ready to release the information https://lso.ca/becoming-licensed/lawyer-licensing-process/articling-candidates/finding-a-placement 

Alternatively this page also has the phone number and email of the folks in charge of articling so you can reach out to them directly and see if they are willing to drop any hints. Good luck!

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Recent Posts

    • This is based on your extensive experience in private practice and hiring?
    • je pense que d'ici demain on devrait avoir des réponses
    • If your aim is to be in government, it's a different calculus than private. Private firms seem to be more skeptical of policy roles, even in relevant subject matter. They prefer someone with an "interest" in the subject matter but who's picked up hard legal skills - even in a different subject.
    • Do you have an idea of why it doesn't draw a lot of interest? 
    • If the policy position is in the same field, it would seem to be relevant experience and not just a "filler" position. I have no relative experience for this question, but would imagine the transfer from policy back to law would become more problematic the longer you held the policy position, but shouldn't be too problematic early on (and "I took an available position in my area, but am interested in moving back into law" is a decent sales pitch if you take a later job interview). For example, if you did the policy job for 1 year, then went to move back to a firm, your "lost time" is less as you've hopefully gotten the relevant exposure to the law, but aren't senior enough that there's an issue in learning to be an associate (ie. handling grunt work). It may even be beneficial experience as it adds a different prospective to the problems. However, 5 years of policy before moving back? Might be a different story, as you are more closely aligned with a 2-3yr associate in realm of associate tasks you are familiar with, but probably don't want to be treated like an intro associate task-wise (all speculating, depends entirely on both policy experience and the tasks your transfer back into). In short, you're not forever excluded from looking for openings while holding the policy job, so if it's of potential interest this may be a "FT is better than contract" conclusion. And who knows, maybe you love the policy job?

  • Create New...