Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
dimsum1

7sage study schedule

Recommended Posts

I created my study schedule and for an Aug 2021 LSAT, it's suggesting 34 hours/wk.  There is no way I can carve out that with my FT job and life.  

Is there a more reasonable schedule (say 8-10 hours a week, maybe 12?) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The 7Sage study schedule is waaaaay overestimated. They give way more time than necessary for each lesson and homework, and like 12 hours per PT, assuming you do every PT after 35, or something like that. I wouldn’t worry about it . Start working through the curriculum at your own pace and adjust from there. You’ll have more than enough time before august. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rebeccamtl said:

The 7Sage study schedule is waaaaay overestimated. They give way more time than necessary for each lesson and homework, and like 12 hours per PT, assuming you do every PT after 35, or something like that. I wouldn’t worry about it . Start working through the curriculum at your own pace and adjust from there. You’ll have more than enough time before august. 

This. 
 

Also, you don’t need to do every single problem set they have. Just do some until you feel you have the hang of it. 
 

It’s also nice to have plenty of problem sets left to come back to when you’re in the practice test phase and can more readily identify areas where you need additional practice. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Seekingredemption said:

This. 
 

Also, you don’t need to do every single problem set they have. Just do some until you feel you have the hang of it. 
 

It’s also nice to have plenty of problem sets left to come back to when you’re in the practice test phase and can more readily identify areas where you need additional practice. 

Thanks for the advice!  I was doing ok on the early sets until the harder ones, and I'm a completionist so I feel super weird about not finishing something on the schedule.  I get the 3 "dot" question difficulty ones most of the time, the 4-dot ones frequently, but the 5-dot is straight up guessing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dimsum1 said:

Thanks for the advice!  I was doing ok on the early sets until the harder ones, and I'm a completionist so I feel super weird about not finishing something on the schedule.  I get the 3 "dot" question difficulty ones most of the time, the 4-dot ones frequently, but the 5-dot is straight up guessing.

Ahh yes. I know that feeling all too well. I determined that getting hung up on the five dot difficulty questions was not really worth it for a couple of reasons. Firstly, unless you’re aiming for a top, top score, you don’t even need to get the majority of those questions right. Secondly, they were demoralizing and would at points put me off of studying for the day. 
 

This is just my opinion, but I think your time is better spent getting a good feel for each question type-not trying to « perfect » one then move on to another.

Keep in mind that you’ll see most of your gains during the PT phase. Problem sets are not really simulating the LSAT, and you need to be simulating game day to perform on game day. 
 

It’s tough but that completionist mindset could be holding you back. 
 

Good luck with your studies. Go slay that dragon.

Edited by Seekingredemption
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Seekingredemption said:

Ahh yes. I know that feeling all too well. I determined that getting hung up on the five dot difficulty questions was not really worth it for a couple of reasons. Firstly, unless you’re aiming for a top, top score, you don’t even need to get the majority of those questions right. Secondly, they were demoralizing and would at points put me off of studying for the day. 
 

This is just my opinion, but I think your time is better spent getting a good feel for each question type-not trying to « perfect » one then move on to another.

Keep in mind that you’ll see most of your gains during the PT phase. Problem sets are not really simulating the LSAT, and you need to be simulating game day to perform on game day. 
 

It’s tough but that completionist mindset could be holding you back. 
 

Good luck with your studies. Go slay that dragon.

Thanks for the advice and pep talk!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JY from 7Sage makes the argument that, if the LSAT is important to you, you will do this. He is aware his schedule is more demanding than other study programs.

If you cannot do a 34 hour per week study schedule, he would probably suggest taking more months to complete the program. Waiting until next summer to write the LSAT is not out of the question from this point of view, not is waiting until the summer of 2023!

I, myself, am in your shoes. I agree with JY in theory, but in reality, I skimped massively on my study time. I am now waiting to get accepted to a law school with an LSAT below 160. I believe I would have a higher LSAT is I had done what JY told me, but I could not get the time off work. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎1‎/‎26‎/‎2021 at 4:33 AM, SNAILS said:

skimped massively on my study time. I am now waiting to get accepted to a law school with an LSAT below 160. I believe I would have a higher LSAT is I had done what JY told me, but I could not get the time off work. 

This is exactly me too.

I'm definitely not trying to make it a competition, but I averaged about 10-15 hours a week of studying on top of 2 jobs and volunteering and I really really wish I would have dedicated more time. I have so many regrets looking back not just doing an extra hour after work, or taking too many days off.

I would say 2-3 hours after work/on your lunch break and then study for a good chunk of hours on your days off/the weekend still allows you to have a life! It's also reasonable to take days off if you are feeling burnt out. I would usually take 1 day off during the week/after work to just relax. 34 hours a week is insane, but if you want to get into law school I think it's better to dedicate the time now instead looking back in regret :( It also doesn't hurt to maybe wait until the next exam, because even if you need to re-write you have a bunch more options as January is usually the latest write for admission the same year.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should clarify what I think about studying 34 hours per week while working full time.

JY from 7Sage.com says that you need to study over 600 hours to achieve your maximum LSAT score potential, and I believe this to be true. I believe this in spite of a lot of posters on these forums achieving or claiming to achieve a 170 LSAT with very little studying. Generally, normal people require more study time.

JY also says that you should be willing to put in whatever work it takes if law school is important to you. I believe this to be true.

Life has taught me that a human being is generally limited to 50-60 hours per week of actual, productive work. So if you work 40+ hours, you simply do not have 34 hours left. If you deprive yourself of sleep and/or down time, you will burn out.

So what do you do? You study those 10 or 12 hours per week as the OP originally suggested. You take the LSAT in August with the full understanding that you are not "done" studying, but rather have taken an early attempt at the LSAT to see if you score well enough.

If you are not happy with your score, keep studying and retake in Sept, Nov, or Jan. Keep studying and retake it in 36 months, if necessary.

An alternative plan would be to reduce your hours of full time work to allow more LSAT study time.  But I can see how this would have financial consequences for most people.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think JY’s practice exams will give you a pretty good indication of what you’re capable of scoring closer to test time. If you are close to your target score, write in Aug. if you are not, consider cancelling/rescheduling. 
 

I studied 8 hrs a day, 6 days a week for 60 days and scored 158 on my first attempt. I was practicing in the low 160s. I am pretty anxious test taker. Some people who have taken logical reasoning in undergrad may need far less study time. It totally depends. 

Do many, many practice exams under proper timed conditions and that will be your answer as to whether or not your ready :)

best of luck! 

Edited by optimistic
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I am looking to begin my apartment hunt for the upcoming school year. What apartments do you recommend? Looking for a nice/clean 1 bedroom apartment
    • I graduated last year, so I'm probably in the best position I ever will be to do one of these. As a preliminary disclaimer, my experience with the zoom aspect was in the back half of my last semester, so I just didn't care about it at all.  I'm also going to focus on things that, I think, set Osgoode apart from many other schools, particularly in Ontario. Every school has a "collegial environment" and fun clubs. I can't tell you if Osgoode's environment is more or less collegial than Queens, because I didn't do 1L at both schools. So me saying it does doesn't help you.  Clinics – This was ultimately why I attended Osgoode, and I think it is Osgoode's one real defining characteristic compared to other schools. Osgoode offers a ton of clinics. Some of them are better than others—looking at you, Osgoode Business Clinic—but the overall quality is quite high and the number/diversity is unmatched by any Canadian law school.  Career Prospects – Osgoode is one of a handful of schools in Canada that offers its graduates the ability to work anywhere in (English-speaking) Canada in more or less any setting. This isn't so much about Osgoode opening doors to you (I don't think any schools except perhaps McGill and U of T truly "open" doors that would otherwise be closed). Rather, it's about not closing doors before you've had the chance to prove you deserve to be considered. When it comes to hiring out of law school, either for summers or articling, there are firms that will just never consider applicants from certain schools.  Bay Street Hiring – If you're dead set on working on Bay Street, don't speak French, and don't get into U of T, you should attend Osgoode. It routinely beats out the other non-U of T schools for placement rate in both the 1L and 2L recruits.  (Appellate) Clerkships –This builds off the point about not closing doors, but Osgoode places a relatively large number of students at the ONSC, ONCA and SCC each year. It also does well with placing students in the Alberta and BC clerkship programs, although the raw numbers are lower due to a lack of interest in clerking out-of-province. You're still going to need very strong grades to get an appellate clerkship, and above average grades for a trial level clerkship, but all else being equal, your odds of getting a clerkship are better at Osgoode than a lot of other schools.  Adjunct Professors – Osgoode benefits from a strong alumni network that includes a lot of alumni who serve as adjunct professors at the school. Osgoode is also purportedly located in Toronto. What that means for you is that you're going to have access to a lot of high end, practicing lawyers to learn from. Almost more importantly, it means you're going to be networking with high end, practicing lawyers regularly, many of whom can either give you a job or help you get one. I know people who articled at top litigation boutiques, top criminal law firms, and top family law firms who ended up there because one of the partners at the firm happened to serve as adjunct profs for trial advocacy or some similar course.  Joint Programs – Osgoode offers four joint programs, including a joint program with U de M that lets you get a civil law degree with one additional year of study. I didn't do a joint program, but I heard nothing but good things from those who did. I also know several people who spun the JD/MES degree into articling positions at top firms practicing environmental law, which is otherwise quite difficult to break into. I imagine the JD/MES was instrumental in them receiving those jobs.  Financial Aid (Your Mileage May Vary) – Osgoode has an overall pretty generous financial aid program, and a decent selection of upper year scholarships. I received an average of $13,000 or so per year from Osgoode, factoring in bursaries, scholarships, and course prizes. How much you get will vary depending on your financial need and academic performance, but it brings the price down to be relatively comparable to the other Ontario schools. Or at least, it did for me.  Course Selection – Osgoode has what I understand to be the widest selection of courses available in any school across Canada. That means you can really customize your experience and tailor your course selection to your career. I considered applying for a letter of permission to UBC or UVic during 3L, and unfortunately found those schools didn't have the diversity of course offerings I had come to expect from my school (not to knock those schools; I'd take fewer courses in exchange for a 14k tuition cut). I took a lot of general courses, but people I know (particularly those who were passionate about family or crim) essentially only took courses in their area of interests in 2 and 3L.  Diversity – Osgoode's class is one of the more diverse classes in Canada. There is still room for a lot of improvement, particularly when it comes to socioeconomic diversity, but the school is trying and it's reflected in the student body. As an example, Osgoode is the only university in Ontario that admitted more black students than their proportion of the populating in Ontario during the last two years. If you're a member of a minority group, Osgoode has very well funded clubs that can provide some really wonderful mentorship and networking opportunities (this also applies to women – OWN has a lot of good events).  The JCR – I know what you're thinking: "BQ, did you run out of things to say and so you're resorting to mentioning the Wednesday night pop-up pub located in the law school where you routinely got drunk before going to class?" Yes. Yes I did. But, it's a fun and relatively unique part of Osgoode culture. You go, you buy a shot, you buy a beer, you sneak it out of the JCR and into your Securities Litigation class. Suddenly, being at school until 8:00 pm learning about National Instrument 51-102 is palatable. And it's the day before Thursday pub nights, so if you're doing it right you can just think of it as a pre-game for that!*  *Don't do that. Drinking for more than 24 hours straight is generally inadvisable.  As for the strikes, they're really what you make of them. I had a strike in my 1L year. All the profs went to online teaching, although you could still attend in class for most of them, if you wanted. You could also pass/fail your courses for that semester if you wanted. For some students it added a lot of stress, but I found it to be relatively chill. 
    • I have similar stats to you and also had undiagnosed ADHD until a couple years ago (once I was diagnosed and got treatment, my LSAT jumped from a 156 to 166, funny how that works). I got into TRU and still have a couple applications outstanding. Definitely worth applying next fall, but I don't think retaking the LSAT is worth it. In the Osgoode school forum, there is a thread where a former admissions committee member answers questions. Its worth a read on its own, but also mentions how they consider factors like ADHD or other extenuating circumstances when evaluating applications. Being able to point to a 168 after you were diagnosed with ADHD I think would go a ways to supporting your application.
    • Absolutely, assuming a reasonable starting point in terms of natural aptitudes, just about anyone could learn to be a good lawyer. Just like I could learn to be a good accountant. But here's an important qualifier. I never would learn to be a good accountant because I am not interested in that work. In fact, on standardized testing, I apparently have very strong mathematical aptitudes - stronger than my language aptitude. And yet I've gravitated into a career that's entirely about language and not at all about math. And I've gotten good at it (I hope) because I find it interesting and it holds my attention. My concern, framed around the OP's many threads, is this. You seem to keep asking about a career in law like you're looking to settle into a job that pays well, looks good on LinkedIn, and doesn't otherwise demand too much of you. I may be being unfair to you right now, and you might actually have very strong motivations towards legal work that are not otherwise apparent in what you've posted. If so, great. But if not, I really think you might want to consider this problem. Saying that you could if sufficiently motivated learn to be a good lawyer isn't much help if you aren't actually motivated. If you're really looking for a career that will give you maximum output in exchange for minimum input, you clearly aren't that motivated. Do something you care about and many of your repeated concerns take care of themselves. The advice may be trite, but it's also very true. If you really want to do law - and I mean if you want to do it for the sake of doing it, not because you think law will be the best return on effort you can find - I'm sure you have the capacity to become good at it. If not, find something else you actually want to do and get good at that.
    • What's your problem,  man?  I don't think I've ever met a lawyer this dense, yet you assume one out of whole cloth for -- what purpose exactly?      

×
×
  • Create New...