Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Will UVIC not accept me until I've completed my Jan LSAT?

Recommended Posts

Self calculated index ~930, 3.77 GPA, 166 LSAT. My application and documents were received NOV30, but I've indicated I'm rewriting in January. My application has been "Application Under Review" since the very beginning, I'm wondering if it is because they are still waiting to see my January rewrite? 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just an applicant myself, so not an expert, and I'm not 100% sure on my answer. Take this with a grain of salt. From what I believe I've read on this forum previously it seems like they will wait for your new LSAT mark to come in before making a decision, just as they often wait for fall grades for fourth year applicants. Their website also says, "We begin evaluating an application when all of the supporting documentation has been received." (https://www.uvic.ca/law/admissions/jdadmissionfaqs/index.php). I'm assuming that an LSAT mark would be considered supporting documentation. If anyone else has more specific knowledge on this please supplement :) 

Edit: It seems like you have a great chance as it stands with those stats so I wouldn't worry too much!! If you're really stressed, I would email the admissions staff with your question. 

Edited by lawlawlaw99662
  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Recent Posts

    • They asked for category: that means regular category, Indigenous, or special consideration*   *not sure what the exact terms are, but something to this effect 
    • It definitely varies depending on the type of firm. Make sure you understand their practice area and the type of matters they handle (and don't handle). You could also look for any recent cases, which could also give you insight into the type of matters they handle beyond what is posted on their website. You definitely want to convey why you want to work for that firm, rather than the firm just being a stepping stone to something you're more interested in if the larger full-service firms didn't work out for you.     "Fit" is very important at smaller firms. They will mostly want to know if they can or want to work with you since you will spend more time in close quarters with everyone. You will likely have more direct client interactions at smaller firms, so professionalism and a level of maturity/common sense are also important. This is especially true if you are helping with intake calls and you are the first point of contact a potential client has with the firm before scheduling a consultation. I can only speak for my firm, but these are the top few things we look for: strong research and writing (we need help with written submissions, appeals, etc.); relevant courses/knowledge of our practice areas (if you have no concept of the legal issues or type of matters we handle, we're not going to be a good fit); personality/fit since we are a small outfit (we are a quirky bunch);  common sense/maturity (don't tell clients how intimidating the hearing was while you're on a break or forget to ask basic intake questions while on a call I also think that smaller firms want you to interview well. They may not be interviewing as many students and have less time to spare on the process. We would typically receive 50+ applications, do phone interviews for the top 8-10 and then only do in-person interviews for the top 4 or 5. Relax knowing that they probably think you're capable of doing the job and that it's just a matter of whether you're the right fit for them or whether they have questions about your application that they want clarification on.  If you want to share the practice area without identifying the firm (or yourself) you may get better insight. Good luck!!!
    • I knew a handful of foreign law grads in law school, all substantially older than 24. Most were in their 30s or 40s. Pretty sure median age for law students in Canada is around 25 (at least it used to be).   So the age or the past isn’t an issue. Maybe it’ll help you write a better personal statement too.
    • Yes sorry! Was that the program you were inquiring about? 
    • It's up to the reviewers to request that you be interviewed. Interviews are not very common and they would only happen where additional context is needed to make a decision. In my time on the committee, I never participated in an interview.   No. Generally speaking, all degrees are looked at identically. What matters are grades. I believe this is the case at every university except, allegedly, U of T (and I'm not even sure how U of T looks at this; I just don't believe that they would have a strong enough statistical sample to be able reasonably gauge grade inflation based on schools and majors vs. success in their law school). There are countless discussions about this topic on the boards and you are welcome to search them to see people's thoughts. I don't want to get into that discussion in this thread and I won't entertain any more comments about it here. That said, I will say that it likely all averages out with a large enough sample size, so it really doesn't make sense that a law school would discriminate based on majors/schools like that in Canada. The US, on the other hand, has quite the varied field of educational institutions and corresponding majors, so some of that analysis may be necessary there. The quality of education in Canada at any post-secondary institution is quite good in general.   I don't know if other schools do it, but Osgoode does not (at least, not when I was on the committee, but I don't see why that would change).   The admissions office will know if you provisionally accepted but as far as I know this will not affect their decision. I certainly never took it into consideration. I don't even think that the committee members have this information readily available; they would have to ask the admissions officers for it.

  • Create New...