Jump to content
MKhandail

Chances? B2 3.1-3.2 Lower Lsat

Recommended Posts

I know it's not high, but I had explained in my application that I was working a part time job due to financial difficulty at home. I know I can improve and aim for a higher school if I had a couple more months, but I have only studied for the past two months or so. When I take a BR, my lsat stands around a 153. I'm thinking during timed and worst case scenario it will stand at a 150. I'm taking a tutor so I'm hoping that I can improve each section by like 2 marks going into the exam  with a possibility of a 155 highest. But i dont know if I can guarantee that.

 

What do you guys think about my possibility of getting accepted? I bombed the interview, I have a lot of ECs during my highschool and undergrad related to social justice and law. I volunteered and worked for law firms and commercial real estate companies. My application stands out for diversity and social justice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What was your LSAT score? Was Ryerson your undergrand university because that would help you with the lower lsat score. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, MKhandail said:

When I take a BR, my lsat stands around a 153.

When you say BR, do you mean after a blind review?

A timed score vs a BR score can be very different. For me the BR score is about 15 points higher then my PT score.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, bobby96 said:

What was your LSAT score? Was Ryerson your undergrand university because that would help you with the lower lsat score. 

Its around a 151 and no my undergrad was not Ryerson but it was a Toronto University

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, SNAILS said:

When you say BR, do you mean after a blind review?

A timed score vs a BR score can be very different. For me the BR score is about 15 points higher then my PT score.

Yes i meant untimed..

I believe timed its roughly a 151. I do well on most LG its just LR that seems to be up and down so I dont know how the test for jan will take me 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MKhandail said:

Its around a 151 and no my undergrad was not Ryerson but it was a Toronto University

York or U of T?

Are your B2 per OLSAS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, bobby96 said:

Was Ryerson your undergrand university because that would help you with the lower lsat score.

How does going to Ryerson help?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, MKhandail said:

Yes i meant untimed..

I believe timed its roughly a 151. I do well on most LG its just LR that seems to be up and down so I don't know how the test for jan will take me 

Your score on an untimed LSAT should not be used as an indicator of how you will perform on a real, timed LSAT. As I alluded to, I score anywhere from 168 to 174 on an untimed LSAT, yet only 156 to 159 on PT. My last official score from Nov was 157.

Based on your reports of only a very small difference between your timed and untimed PT scores, I believe you are not spending enough time on BR. I usually spend an hour or two at least on BR; for me, LG takes the most time as I usually only get it half done under timed condiations.

This is not to say that taking the LSAT untimed is a bad study strategy. 7Sage.com, which is where I believe the term BR is most commonly used, recommends taking a practice  LSAT under timed conditions (the score  and correct answer distribution from this is very important) and then continuing to do a BR before checking the answers. You get the most out of every fresh LSAT using this method.

Keep studying, and best of luck for the 2022 application cycle. If you wish to dedicate the time and energy necessary to maybe get into law school, you will need to purchase more real LSAT prep tests and probably also invest in a good study resource such as 7Sage.com.

And please let us know your PT scores under real, timed conditions once you get comfortable with it.

FYI, you'll need probably a 160+ on an official test.

You also mention you have a tutor. If you are paying this person any significant amount of money, then I am surprised that you have not gotten better advice from them and thus require us here on this forum to tell you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since Ryerson law has only had 1 cycle it's hard to predict with any confidence. That said, unfortunately you have low grades, a low predicted LSAT, and you feel that you bombed the interview. None of those lend to good odds. That said, if you aren't accepted this year then you have ample time to improve your LSAT and prep for another interview. 

I sympathize with your circumstance, but unfortunately working during school (I'm assuming you mean your job was during school, not during LSAT prep) may be a reason for lower grades, but doesn't demonstrate that if you weren't working you'd have achieved significantly higher grades. Typically schools are looking for at least a few semesters of consistently good marks on which to see your academic potential.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/12/2021 at 9:42 PM, LawBlaw2019 said:

Since Ryerson law has only had 1 cycle it's hard to predict with any confidence. That said, unfortunately you have low grades, a low predicted LSAT, and you feel that you bombed the interview. None of those lend to good odds. That said, if you aren't accepted this year then you have ample time to improve your LSAT and prep for another interview. 

I sympathize with your circumstance, but unfortunately working during school (I'm assuming you mean your job was during school, not during LSAT prep) may be a reason for lower grades, but doesn't demonstrate that if you weren't working you'd have achieved significantly higher grades. Typically schools are looking for at least a few semesters of consistently good marks on which to see your academic potential.

No by "bombed" i mean I butchered it. As in, I think I did incredible. I am trying to personalize my application as a candidate for social justice. But in terms of competitive scoring, I am def not one of the candidates. I was hopeful Ryerson was more holistic. I guess there is always next year!

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, MKhandail said:

No by "bombed" i mean I butchered it. As in, I think I did incredible. 

Both "bombed" and "butchered" sound negative to me. Guess I'm too old to know the lingo these days.

And hey, I think it's a long shot but it's not 0% (plus I'm not on the admissions committee so my opinion doesn't matter :)). Best of luck and if it doesn't work out then you're right, always next year. If you're able to offset your grades with a stronger LSAT you'll be a more competitive applicant. 

Edited by LawBlaw2019
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I think the main reason it isn't an automatic go-to is that it requires sinking in more time and money, often eats up hours one could spend working, and they may not even be accepted into law school in the end anyway. The desire to get a 80%+ average is different said than done (not impossible, obviously). It can also be a bigger commitment than redoing the LSAT.  It seems to be common now for people to take five years to finish undergrad, at least at my university. Some for reduced workload, and some to have a better shot at landing needed research experience for grad studies. But planning to take five years from the beginning is different than hitting fourth year, realizing you want to go to [insert professional program here] but your grades aren't good enough. Now the pressure is on to make a decision. Moreover, for those whose parents are paying for the education, I assume the incentive would be to not take an extra year on a maybe.  Because Ryerson is the only place that does B20, it probably isn't worth it in many people's heads to increase their shot at just one school, versus increasing one's L2 and broadening their chances at more places. So I assume a full-time year would be what most people default to when they consider more studies. That's a bigger ask. 
    • I agree for sure. I was just highlighting the drawback of a rather blunt tool of enforcing a certain pay across the board. In dealing with exploitation, that would throw out the baby with the bath water.  
    • 100% right, I was just thinking about the importance of networking, access to mentorship (as you allude to), referrals, etc. Definitely for new call solos that stuff is more important than the reputation of one's alma mater, but it's something that Canadian schools would still better serve people for to at least some extent. I wonder how Bond students could establish such connections if they didn't already have them.
    • Thank you for the comprehensive reply. I apologize -- this question may have been very basic. I just received an offer from Western on the 11th, so I am trying to get a clearer picture of what to expect. Having been through 1L, would you also happen to have any advice for preparing over the summer before 1L? Any books worth reading or anything like that? Thanks again.
    • This is really all I do on this board at this point. I know of one. Sole practitioner in criminal, but they share office space with more experienced practitioners (and are often brought on to their cases). This person has access to mentorship etc. that way so it isn't the same as just hanging a shingle. To be fair, I think it is a really really tough road for ANY new call to start solo. Whether they graduated top of class at U of T or are a lowly Bond grad.

×
×
  • Create New...