Jump to content
akvee

Osgoode In Queue 2021

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, positivelylawstreet said:

Question. If you are in queue during this time, does that mean you are likely accepted?

No

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anybody else's status date change but not the message? :0

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In queue as of the fourteenth of January. 

LSAT: 164 

CGPA: 3.38

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in queue as of Jan. 14th 

cGPA: 3.31

L2: 3.66

LSAT: 162 

Completed Part B. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also in queue as at 1/14.

cGPA: 3.72

L2: ~3.9

LSAT 158

Edit: Did not fill out Part B.

Edited by DMoney115
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, surf2020 said:

In queue as of Jan 15

CGPA: 3.35

L2: 3.68

LSAT: 163

Filled out Part B

whats part B? Ive been seeing it for a while now.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/17/2021 at 12:29 PM, nikrai123 said:

whats part B? Ive been seeing it for a while now.

 

It was the optional part of the application to Osgoode on OLSAS that allowed you to provide details on the following if they relate to your situation:

Select any of the following consid­erations that are relevant to your application.
a) Equity
b) Work or life experience
c) Performance consid­erations
d) Diversity

It then said:

Elaborate on the selected consid­erations (maximum 2,500 characters). All information will remain strictly confid­ential.

Edited by Lawstandfound
added "optional"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In queue as of January 19th.

CGPA: 3.40

B3: 3.60

L2: 3.78 to 3.87 (depending on whether you include the extra semester I did at the end of my degree)

LSAT: 158 (best)

Filled out Part B.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, WindsorEquityPartner said:

I’m curious if anyone has gone from in queue to rejected or if all either stay in queue or get accepted. 
 

Good luck all!

In previous years, yes, some who are In Queue are eventually rejected.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In queue as of Jan 19th

3.33 CGPA, 163 LSAT, took the Jan 2021 LSAT as well. Filled out Part B. Third time applying, was waitlisted last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recent Posts

    • It is one of the big four you listed. Again I want to reiterate that I have zero issue with the adcomms knowing which party it is. I was only wondering if they would dislike a partisan PS in general. To my knowledge they like to have a class with a variety of viewpoints, so I can't see them discounting anyone for being involved with one of the big four.
    • I don't necessarily think it would be an advantage, I just wanted to make sure it wouldn't be a disadvantage as its what I wanted to focus my PS on. So thanks for the info! Yeah I was confused when he said that. I assumed it would be neutral or beneficial for law school and more likely a downside to a firm if anything.
    • I feel like unless you're on the board for, like, a far-right white supremacist party or something really out there like the Rhinoceros Party, I doubt they'd hold it against you. If it's one of the big four (Conservative, Liberal, NDP, Green), I really don't think they'd care. If you're still unsure or not comfortable, though, you can always leave out the party name. Just as a heads up, though, when you submit your OLSAS sketch you also need to submit the names of people who can verify your involvement in the role. They only contact these people if they suspect something's fishy with what you've said, but if on the off chance they do reach out (and it really isn't that often, one of mine said that they've been listed as a verifier for tons of law school applicants and schools have never once called), they'll be able to find out the party name then, so it may not even matter.
    • I can't see a problem mentioning it in law school applications. However, I can't seeing it being more of an advantage than any other EC or community participation during undergrad. As for job interviews, it's unlikely to be of much benefit and, in some circumstances, may be a detriment.
    • Yes, I received an ITC email today (not specifying the firm for anonymity, but feel free to PM me if you're curious!)   My friend heard from Harris yesterday.

×
×
  • Create New...