Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alright so I calculated a 0.819, is that accurate with my scores? 

3.7/4.0 - so the ratio difference between 4/4.3 1.075 so I can just multiply 3.7 x 1.075 to figure out my 4.3 score correct? 

So it would be 3.97/4.3. 

LSAT: 160 

I think I calculated right, if I'm wrong please someone let me know!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that a 3.7 in say Ontario is a 3.67/4.3 on Dal's scale. I was also under the impression that it is converted into a % grade if it isn't already and then used. (LSAT percentile x 40%)+(%GPA x 60%)=index score, I am told from here that 0.81 is competitive but I remember hearing from an admissions session at Dal that 0.78 is generally competitive and generally Maritime and Non-Maritime students have roughly the same index averages. Do with that what you will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Hopefullawstudenttt said:

Alright so I calculated a 0.819, is that accurate with my scores? 

3.7/4.0 - so the ratio difference between 4/4.3 1.075 so I can just multiply 3.7 x 1.075 to figure out my 4.3 score correct? 

So it would be 3.97/4.3. 

LSAT: 160 

I think I calculated right, if I'm wrong please someone let me know!

Hi, I think the safest way to do it is to convert your grades onto the 4.3 scale, then calculate the average that way because for me, this conversion does not convert my cGPA from 4-4.3 correctly.

Right now, my cGPA is 3.61 but 3.77/4.3 scale but L2 is 3.83/4 which miraculously is 4.15/4.3 scale. I think it's because each grade isn't necessary 1.075 apart when switched to 4.3 scale. For example:

(A+) 4.3/4 = 1.075

(A) 4/3.9 = 1.025

(A-) 3.7/3.7 = 1

(B+) 3.3/3.3 = 1 

... etc.

It's made this way to credit upper grades (A+ and As) more. I have a perfect A+ across my third year which is why my L2 is significantly more than my cGPA.

Here's Dals grade scale to get started: https://www.dal.ca/campus_life/academic-support/grades-and-student-records/grade-scale-and-definitions.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, lawlizard said:

Hi, I think the safest way to do it is to convert your grades onto the 4.3 scale, then calculate the average that way because for me, this conversion does not convert my cGPA from 4-4.3 correctly.

Right now, my cGPA is 3.61 but 3.77/4.3 scale but L2 is 3.83/4 which miraculously is 4.15/4.3 scale. I think it's because each grade isn't necessary 1.075 apart when switched to 4.3 scale. For example:

(A+) 4.3/4 = 1.075

(A) 4/3.9 = 1.025

(A-) 3.7/3.7 = 1

(B+) 3.3/3.3 = 1 

... etc.

It's made this way to credit upper grades (A+ and As) more. I have a perfect A+ across my third year which is why my L2 is significantly more than my cGPA.

Here's Dals grade scale to get started: https://www.dal.ca/campus_life/academic-support/grades-and-student-records/grade-scale-and-definitions.html

So I add up all of the marks and then divide by the number of credits or ?? Sorry, I've just seen multiple ways to convert this and I haven't found a consistent way? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries! Divide by number of courses (only if your courses are all worth the same).

So say your semester grades were

A+, A, A+, B+ it would be (4.3 + 4 + 4.3 + 3.3)/4 (courses) = 15.9/4 = 3.975

If your courses are not worth the same, you would have to convert to a 4.3 scale, then multiple the grade by the number of credits and then divide by then number of total credits involved.

For example:

A+ (worth 3 credits), A (also worth 3 credits), A+ (worth 3 credits), B+ (worth credits) would be ((4.3x3)+(4x3)+(4.3x3)+(3.3x4))/13 (total number of credits per semester) = 51/13 = 3.92 

The reason why this one is lower than the first is because the B+ is worth .25 more than the other grades in this scenario. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, lawlizard said:

No worries! Divide by number of courses (only if your courses are all worth the same).

So say your semester grades were

A+, A, A+, B+ it would be (4.3 + 4 + 4.3 + 3.3)/4 (courses) = 15.9/4 = 3.975

If your courses are not worth the same, you would have to convert to a 4.3 scale, then multiple the grade by the number of credits and then divide by then number of total credits involved.

For example:

A+ (worth 3 credits), A (also worth 3 credits), A+ (worth 3 credits), B+ (worth credits) would be ((4.3x3)+(4x3)+(4.3x3)+(3.3x4))/13 (total number of credits per semester) = 51/13 = 3.92 

The reason why this one is lower than the first is because the B+ is worth .25 more than the other grades in this scenario. 

Thanks so much, I figured it out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • From my experience, I improved my grades drastically when I stopped implementing "boiler plate" statements of the law into my exams. If you are doing any pre-writes beforehand, I would recommend stopping, and instead focus the majority of your space (80%+) on analysis of the facts.  Additionally, ensure that you are showing both sides of every argument - avoid words like "clearly", "obviously" - if it was clear or obvious in the professor's mind, it probably wouldn't be on the exam. To address the clarity element your professor is referring to, I would recommend using lots of headings and sub-headings to divide the issues, so your prof knows specifically which you are speaking to.  If you aren't doing these things already and are able to implement them, you should definitely see some improvement! 
    • I just got my fall grades back and overall I did well. My lowest grade so far has been a B in Criminal Law. It was the criminal law exam I wanted to ask about. I got a B on the exam. My prof said that, while I had alot of good analysis, a lot of my analysis was muddled by irrelevant information. She also said that I am not precise in my writing, and sometimes it is difficult to determine what specific elements of the issue/problem I am trying to arrive at. I scheduled an official feedback session with her. Would there be anything anyone here could advise me on in terms of how to be more precise on exams, and filter out irrelevant information? Has anyone else had this problem? I will say that I panicked on this exam and did not think, at one point, that I was going to write anything at all. So during the exam I started writing and then did not have a lot of time to edit once I finished. I also believe that a B is a perfectly good grade considering my other grades were higher, but I would personally like to get a B+ in this course, considering the class average is a B/B+.
    • I have experience, but it depends on what you want to know exactly
    • Noted.  I will definitely consider UNB, although if you saw my transcript you would cringe, there's lots of 50's and 60's on there from a point in my life where I would have been satisfied with a business degree.  So I'm definitely relying on some of the more holistic schools lol.  I'm capable of much better than that but it's going to take some time or luck to "remedy my standing with God and men" as Machiavelli would say.
    • Queens won't take summer courses. Everyone else will. As for which credits they take, it varies a bit by school but your L2 is roughly your last 4 consecutive semesters. But again, it varies.  Also consider applying to UNB, they'll remove 25% of your worst marks if you've graduated. They will also give you bonus points if you are from the Maritimes. 

×
×
  • Create New...