Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Alright so I calculated a 0.819, is that accurate with my scores? 

3.7/4.0 - so the ratio difference between 4/4.3 1.075 so I can just multiply 3.7 x 1.075 to figure out my 4.3 score correct? 

So it would be 3.97/4.3. 

LSAT: 160 

I think I calculated right, if I'm wrong please someone let me know!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that a 3.7 in say Ontario is a 3.67/4.3 on Dal's scale. I was also under the impression that it is converted into a % grade if it isn't already and then used. (LSAT percentile x 40%)+(%GPA x 60%)=index score, I am told from here that 0.81 is competitive but I remember hearing from an admissions session at Dal that 0.78 is generally competitive and generally Maritime and Non-Maritime students have roughly the same index averages. Do with that what you will.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Hopefullawstudenttt said:

Alright so I calculated a 0.819, is that accurate with my scores? 

3.7/4.0 - so the ratio difference between 4/4.3 1.075 so I can just multiply 3.7 x 1.075 to figure out my 4.3 score correct? 

So it would be 3.97/4.3. 

LSAT: 160 

I think I calculated right, if I'm wrong please someone let me know!

Hi, I think the safest way to do it is to convert your grades onto the 4.3 scale, then calculate the average that way because for me, this conversion does not convert my cGPA from 4-4.3 correctly.

Right now, my cGPA is 3.61 but 3.77/4.3 scale but L2 is 3.83/4 which miraculously is 4.15/4.3 scale. I think it's because each grade isn't necessary 1.075 apart when switched to 4.3 scale. For example:

(A+) 4.3/4 = 1.075

(A) 4/3.9 = 1.025

(A-) 3.7/3.7 = 1

(B+) 3.3/3.3 = 1 

... etc.

It's made this way to credit upper grades (A+ and As) more. I have a perfect A+ across my third year which is why my L2 is significantly more than my cGPA.

Here's Dals grade scale to get started: https://www.dal.ca/campus_life/academic-support/grades-and-student-records/grade-scale-and-definitions.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, lawlizard said:

Hi, I think the safest way to do it is to convert your grades onto the 4.3 scale, then calculate the average that way because for me, this conversion does not convert my cGPA from 4-4.3 correctly.

Right now, my cGPA is 3.61 but 3.77/4.3 scale but L2 is 3.83/4 which miraculously is 4.15/4.3 scale. I think it's because each grade isn't necessary 1.075 apart when switched to 4.3 scale. For example:

(A+) 4.3/4 = 1.075

(A) 4/3.9 = 1.025

(A-) 3.7/3.7 = 1

(B+) 3.3/3.3 = 1 

... etc.

It's made this way to credit upper grades (A+ and As) more. I have a perfect A+ across my third year which is why my L2 is significantly more than my cGPA.

Here's Dals grade scale to get started: https://www.dal.ca/campus_life/academic-support/grades-and-student-records/grade-scale-and-definitions.html

So I add up all of the marks and then divide by the number of credits or ?? Sorry, I've just seen multiple ways to convert this and I haven't found a consistent way? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries! Divide by number of courses (only if your courses are all worth the same).

So say your semester grades were

A+, A, A+, B+ it would be (4.3 + 4 + 4.3 + 3.3)/4 (courses) = 15.9/4 = 3.975

If your courses are not worth the same, you would have to convert to a 4.3 scale, then multiple the grade by the number of credits and then divide by then number of total credits involved.

For example:

A+ (worth 3 credits), A (also worth 3 credits), A+ (worth 3 credits), B+ (worth credits) would be ((4.3x3)+(4x3)+(4.3x3)+(3.3x4))/13 (total number of credits per semester) = 51/13 = 3.92 

The reason why this one is lower than the first is because the B+ is worth .25 more than the other grades in this scenario. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, lawlizard said:

No worries! Divide by number of courses (only if your courses are all worth the same).

So say your semester grades were

A+, A, A+, B+ it would be (4.3 + 4 + 4.3 + 3.3)/4 (courses) = 15.9/4 = 3.975

If your courses are not worth the same, you would have to convert to a 4.3 scale, then multiple the grade by the number of credits and then divide by then number of total credits involved.

For example:

A+ (worth 3 credits), A (also worth 3 credits), A+ (worth 3 credits), B+ (worth credits) would be ((4.3x3)+(4x3)+(4.3x3)+(3.3x4))/13 (total number of credits per semester) = 51/13 = 3.92 

The reason why this one is lower than the first is because the B+ is worth .25 more than the other grades in this scenario. 

Thanks so much, I figured it out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Je crois qu'ils vont commencer à envoyer des offres bientôt. J'ai eu une convocation à la rédaction (Évaluation de français écrit, comme étudient anglophone) et dans le mail ils ont écrit "Cette convocation s'adresse aux candidats en voie d'être formellement admis à au moins un programme. Elle ne constitue pas un avis d'admission." Vue que j'ai fait une demande d'admission pour un seul programme, j'imagine que sa vas dire qu'ils ont commencé à prendre des décisions sur les dossiers déjà complets.     Par-contre mon dossier est toujours "a l'étude" dans mon compte étudient. 
    • Bonjour! J'ai également appliqué en novembre pour l'automne 2021! ☺️ En regardant les forums des années précédentes, les premières réponses semblent être envoyées à la mi/fin-février. 
    • That's what extensions are for! I adjourned hearings, got extensions on written submissions and, like Douglas Adams said, listened to the whoooooshing sound that deadlines made as they flew by. We had our 2 year old home while daycare was closed from mid-March to August. My spouse is a health care professional and she still had a full client-load seeing them over video. Our compromise was that she had to give up Monday so she could be full-time toddler duty Saturday-Monday. The rest of the week, she worked 9-5 doing video sessions and I was on toddler duty. I would work evenings and weekends just to keep up. I only managed (to keep up with work) because I would put in 15 hour days Saturday-Monday and then got in 4-5 hours on days I was on toddler duty after she went to bed. It was an awful grind. It feels like we may be trending back in that direction with cases going up and I don't know how we could manage like that again. It feels harder now - at least when EVERYTHING was closed, opposing counsel, the courts, tribunals, etc. could relate because their kids were home too. Our toddler is back in daycare but we are debating pulling her out with cases on the rise. However, we both feel that people are less understanding now (in terms of extension requests or rescheduling client sessions for her) because it would be our choice to keep her home and they may not relate.  
    • What is the significance of having the undergrad completed at Ryerson?
    • UofT, Queens, Western, and maybe some other non-Ontario schools all started Fall 2020 in person with masks on. I don't see why this model wouldn't also be used once a decent portion of the population has been vaccinated. 

×
×
  • Create New...