Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is taking the LSAT for the first time in January for applications this cycle too much of a risk? For reference, I will be applying to U of A, U of C, UBC, and UVic with the following:

cGPA ~3.75, L2 3.9. Never taken the LSAT before, but I have experience with standardized exams and have scored fairly well before.

I anticipate I will have quite a bit of time to study for the exam as I have already graduated. I am hoping to put in at LEAST 3 hours a day, but I could realistically manage ~8 hours most days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think you have much of a choice if you plan to apply for this cycle. A couple of schools do accept the Feb LSAT, but I forget which.

In any case, with your GPA you wouldn't need an incredible LSAT score to get in at most of those schools. It's definitely doable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Luckycharm said:

Putting all the eggs in one basket can't be wise.

The things is I'm not- I am applying to multiple other professional/masters programs. 

As @Musashi mentioned, I wouldn't need a phenonmal LSAT to get admitted into the schools I am applying for which I think helps my case

Regardless though, I am most concerned with the feasibility of studying for the January LSAT with the time I have left

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't believe any of your chosen schools will accept the February LSAT. I know that Dalhousie and Western (and others I'm sure) do though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, hellohi said:

The things is I'm not- I am applying to multiple other professional/masters programs. 

As @Musashi mentioned, I wouldn't need a phenonmal LSAT to get admitted into the schools I am applying for which I think helps my case

Regardless though, I am most concerned with the feasibility of studying for the January LSAT with the time I have left

Good luck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/14/2020 at 6:11 AM, hellohi said:

Is taking the LSAT for the first time in January for applications this cycle too much of a risk? 

If you're applying this cycle then taking the LSAT for the first time in January isn't a risk, it's your only option. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, LawBlaw2019 said:

If you're applying this cycle then taking the LSAT for the first time in January isn't a risk, it's your only option. 

I'm aware of this- the purpose of my post was to more so assess how realistic my objective is. Is it unheard of for people to start studying in November and than write in January?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, hellohi said:

I'm aware of this- the purpose of my post was to more so assess how realistic my objective is. Is it unheard of for people to start studying in November and than write in January?

Certainly not unheard of. There are a lot of factors at play. A lengthier study period is typically recommended. I imagine most will not achieve their peak potential/score in two months. But you only have the time you have so just do your best. You may well have a high diagnostic and learn the test quickly. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, LawBlaw2019 said:

If you're applying this cycle then taking the LSAT for the first time in January isn't a risk, it's your only option. 

Wrong, Feb is also an option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MountainMon said:

Wrong, Feb is also an option.

This is not the case for any of the schools mentioned by the OP.

OP: Some people write the LSAT with no study at all and get great scores. Others study for years and never get the score they need. Most fall somewhere in between.

The problem for you as you prepare, and for anyone else trying to advise you, is that none of us know where you will fall on that spectrum.

For what little it's worth, I had for less than 8 weeks last year between my decision to pursue Law School and my sole write in November. However, I only improved by 3 points from my initial PT to my actual score in that 8 weeks. All in LG, and realistically within a luck-based margin of error anyway.

So yes, there are some of us around here who've been in your shoes, but there's no way for us to know whether you'll have more or less success than (for example) me. Let's hope more! :)  

-GM

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, GrumpyMountie said:

This is not the case for any of the schools mentioned by the OP.

OP: Some people write the LSAT with no study at all and get great scores. Others study for years and never get the score they need. Most fall somewhere in between.

The problem for you as you prepare, and for anyone else trying to advise you, is that none of us know where you will fall on that spectrum.

For what little it's worth, I had for less than 8 weeks last year between my decision to pursue Law School and my sole write in November. However, I only improved by 3 points from my initial PT to my actual score in that 8 weeks. All in LG, and realistically within a luck-based margin of error anyway.

So yes, there are some of us around here who've been in your shoes, but there's no way for us to know whether you'll have more or less success than (for example) me. Let's hope more! :)  

-GM

Good catch, got this mixed up with another thread re: OLSAS schools. Grrr Mondays....

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would personally take a timed diagnostic test to see where you land without studying (there's a free test on the LSAC website). I think its extremely doable to do well enough to get into a school with two months of studying, especially with your GPA and the amount of time you have to study. 

It really depends on the person, how well you learn, and your diagnostic score. 

Good Luck!

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you do take the Jan LSAT.

Worst case scenario, you score low, and do not get into a law school for 2021.

If you have not committed to any other graduate programs, then this puts you in a great position for the 2022 cycle. You will be able to learn from your experience, and figure out what you need to do to score better next time. 

Edit: You could take both the Jan and Feb if you wanted. (If the financial cost is acceptable to you).

Edited by SNAILS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Bonjour, hi Je suis étudiante au Bacc à l’université de l’UQAM. J’ai 3,88 de GPA en science politique et 66 crédits d’accumulés. J’ai fais ma demande il y a deux jours à l’UQAM et l’UDEM. Qui a reçu des réponses déjà ? sinon quels sont vos statistiques? Venez on se supporte jusqu’aux résultats 🙏🏻🤞🏻
    • Got an offer this afternoon. TRU seems like an awesome school. I am so excited to meet new people and expand my mind. I am very grateful to TRU for offering me this opportunity.  GPA Grade Range from Application Assessment: A+  LSAT: 163, 86th percentile.   Regular applicant EC's: Worked in an MLA's Office for 8 months, interned for a provincial Minister of Education, tons of volunteering for a provincial political party, did an honours thesis during my degree, and worked as a policy researcher in the US.  Good luck to everyone and never give up! I've seen users in other spaces of this forum who like to make others feel insecure, don't let them deter you!
    • My best 2 years was 3.02, but this endeavor may be a waste of time and I fully understand that I should have dropped out rather than half-ass it for 5 years. But I need to know if discretionary boards would consider high 90's and 100's in full course load on top of a good lsat as enough evidence to admit?
    • I can't really afford Windsor. But I'm desperate to get into law school. As we know these days an undergrad degree is by itself a worthless scrap of paper. I understand that York and Toronto are out of the question, but I don't need to work on Bay Street, I have a dream of being a criminal defense lawyer in any capacity, even legal aid. I hope by showing that when motivated I am capable of high 90's and 100's as well as a good LSAT that I can impress the review boards and get in. I am unfortunately a white male and I know that doesn't help my chances for access but my illness was severe and kept me from taking my studies seriously. Now that I am focused I am studying 10 hours a day and breezing through all my courses. But I understand that sometimes it's just too late. Do you think it would sound like a sob story? Or would a severe mental illness qualify as discretionary/access? Any responses appreciated
    • Hello, To anyone who understands how discretionary works, I am wondering what the details of this category are and what schools I should apply to, as well as what the best wording to use in my letters.   I was diagnosed 2 years ago with severe mental illness. My GPA is terrible 2.60 however my last semester I got a 4.3 and I believe I can pull off another 2 before applying in November. If I can get a psychiatrist letter and score 170 plus on the LSAT, and write a compelling letter, both of which I believe are possible, do you think a full year of perfect grades along with an explanation of my poor GPA and a good LSAT would be enough to get into a more holistic school such as TRU or Lakehead, or even Dalhousie? Do you know if Dalhousie counts summer semesters in their "last 2 years" metric?    Sorry for the rambling. Any knowledge is appreciated on this subject  

×
×
  • Create New...