I'm assuming that they're too busy teeing up the evidence demonstrating that the LSAT is unique amongst all human endeavours in that anyone with enough time and effort can find themselves in the top 99.9% of all performers, even those scoring in the bottom percentile.
Not particularly. For ease of reference I've quoted both the post you were responding to and your response with the relevant parts bolded. Notably your original response doesn't mention violence at all or even mention race. Probably because you were pretty clearly not responding directly to the part about race, that only came up when you wanted to avoid responding to Masterofnut directly. These are conspicuously the same parts that Masterofnut block quoted when asking you what the difference was, which you opted not to address.
The idea of comparing generalizations with respect to an immutable characteristic like race to political groups is laughable. Lots of generalizations can and should be made to "an entire group".
I just got into McGill!! I had my French comprehension test on Wednesday February 24th and I checked my Minerva today to see the offer of admission (conditional on the completion of a French course). I haven't received the letter yet but that will be coming on Monday I think-- I'm so happy!! I will be accepting I can't wait to meet you all (in person) in September!
GPA (from McGill) honours in Philosophy : 3.76
LOR's: both academic, one prof I took two classes with and was her RA, the other prof was my supervisor for my undergraduate thesis.
EC's: I founded and ran an activist collective at McGill for 5 years, RA work in animal rights ethics and policy-making, won the Arts Award at graduation, was nominated for a few other awards during my time at McGill. I think my EC's helped me a lot.
The classic "I don't have a good response to a rational argument against my bad point". But yeah too many logical flaws that you are too tired to point out.
Edit: Kind of reminds me of that anti-masker in that one thread
no...? If you want me to make it clear and simple for you @HammurabiTime, the person I replied to was drawing up an argument that shit human alt-righters subscribe to, which is that these negative characteristics xyz are drawn from a persons race. They were applying this extremist view to an entire group (conservatives), which is whats laughably stupid and uneducated.
Does this clarify things?