Jump to content
Josh4567

GPA 2.7 LSAT 158

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Relentless2017 said:

-Snip-

First off, the 2L recruit is much larger than the 1L recruit. That is why you moved the goalpost between your posts.

Secondly, it means virtually nothing to point to the amount of students hired at a given firm. There are plenty of employers and almost all students apply broadly.

The impression you are creating is wrong.

2L stats: http://ultravires.ca/2019/12/toronto-summer-2020-2l-recruit-numbers/

Edited by CleanHands
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know if Ryerson averages LSATs or takes the best one? That's my best shot, I have 6, 80 percent courses so far and 4 high 70's with 10 courses to go before november.  Wondering if I should try multiple LSAT's or just wait??

 

Also, to the OP, I hope you get in!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thanks. I have a 3.35 for my best 10 courses, with 10 to go before november, so I could possibly get that up to 3.6-3.8, so Ryerson is probably my best chance. What are some good extracurriculars I could do? I've been scoring various shades of 160 on the LSAT which is good. But debate club is closed due to covid and I'm not doing anything right now other than working at fast food and university. I will need something on there. I have a criminal record from a misspent youth so most volunteering is out.

30 minutes ago, SadNWO said:

They don't average them. They take your highest.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, NoHopeLeftLol said:

Okay thanks. I have a 3.35 for my best 10 courses, with 10 to go before november, so I could possibly get that up to 3.6-3.8, so Ryerson is probably my best chance. What are some good extracurriculars I could do? I've been scoring various shades of 160 on the LSAT which is good. But debate club is closed due to covid and I'm not doing anything right now other than working at fast food and university. I will need something on there. I have a criminal record from a misspent youth so most volunteering is out.

 

A 3.8 and a 160 would be very respectable. As for ECs I can't think of too many options for you. Just try and represent yourself well in the interviews and have a solid PS. That should give you a good shot at Ryerson. And if those last credits bring your GPA or L2 up enough you may even try applying more broadly (I don't know if you're set on a certian area or not). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, SadNWO said:

A 3.8 and a 160 would be very respectable. As for ECs I can't think of too many options for you. Just try and represent yourself well in the interviews and have a solid PS. That should give you a good shot at Ryerson. And if those last credits bring your GPA or L2 up enough you may even try applying more broadly (I don't know if you're set on a certian area or not). 

OK thanks for the help.  I'm also thinking about Dalhousie as long as I can keep my grades up, and Sask if I can do a good LSAT as well as applying some other schools on access with a psychiatrist letter due to the fact that I was diagnosed with severe mental illness and this has affected my grades until this past year, where things stabilised abit and I was able to pull off a solid semester and things also going well so far this semester.  I have some good academic references and have a knack for interviews so hopefully things will work out, if not I will try again in another year after getting my cGPA up a bit higher and working some EC's in there.  But no I'm not set on any particular school; from what I've gathered here any law school in Canada is a major blessing.  I hope to someday work as a defense lawyer and mental health advocate in Newfoundland.

 

Sorry for asking a billion questions, but do you know if L2 usually includes summer semesters/last 20 credits or if it means last 2 years literally?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, NoHopeLeftLol said:

OK thanks for the help.  I'm also thinking about Dalhousie as long as I can keep my grades up, and Sask if I can do a good LSAT as well as applying some other schools on access with a psychiatrist letter due to the fact that I was diagnosed with severe mental illness and this has affected my grades until this past year, where things stabilised abit and I was able to pull off a solid semester and things also going well so far this semester.  I have some good academic references and have a knack for interviews so hopefully things will work out, if not I will try again in another year after getting my cGPA up a bit higher and working some EC's in there.  But no I'm not set on any particular school; from what I've gathered here any law school in Canada is a major blessing.  I hope to someday work as a defense lawyer and mental health advocate in Newfoundland.

 

Sorry for asking a billion questions, but do you know if L2 usually includes summer semesters/last 20 credits or if it means last 2 years literally?

Queens won't take summer courses. Everyone else will. As for which credits they take, it varies a bit by school but your L2 is roughly your last 4 consecutive semesters. But again, it varies. 

Also consider applying to UNB, they'll remove 25% of your worst marks if you've graduated. They will also give you bonus points if you are from the Maritimes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, SadNWO said:

Queens won't take summer courses. Everyone else will. As for which credits they take, it varies a bit by school but your L2 is roughly your last 4 consecutive semesters. But again, it varies. 

Also consider applying to UNB, they'll remove 25% of your worst marks if you've graduated. They will also give you bonus points if you are from the Maritimes. 

Noted.  I will definitely consider UNB, although if you saw my transcript you would cringe, there's lots of 50's and 60's on there from a point in my life where I would have been satisfied with a business degree.  So I'm definitely relying on some of the more holistic schools lol.  I'm capable of much better than that but it's going to take some time or luck to "remedy my standing with God and men" as Machiavelli would say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, NoHopeLeftLol said:

Okay thanks. I have a 3.35 for my best 10 courses, with 10 to go before november, so I could possibly get that up to 3.6-3.8, so Ryerson is probably my best chance. What are some good extracurriculars I could do? I've been scoring various shades of 160 on the LSAT which is good. But debate club is closed due to covid and I'm not doing anything right now other than working at fast food and university. I will need something on there. I have a criminal record from a misspent youth so most volunteering is out.

 

I'm not sure how this makes mathematical sense. I could be wrong here, but I think getting a 3.8 B20 will be very hard.

So let's assume you get an A+ in 10 courses before you graduate. This gives you 3.675 B20 at most (4.0 x10 + 3.35 x 10) divided by 20.

Let's say you get a few low A's and a few A+'s. 3.7 x 5 + 4.0 x 5 + 3.35 x 10 divided by 20. You are sitting at maybe a 3.6.

Even one B+ or less out of your next best 10 courses will drop you more into the 3.5 B20 range.

Doing the math is not my job, and I admit I am making this post without proper time to figure this out exactly. (I'm saying this respectfully!) But you might want to double check your realistic GPA expectations.

Reference: https://www.ouac.on.ca/guide/olsas-ryerson/ (go to "Requirements)

https://www.ouac.on.ca/guide/olsas-conversion-table/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, SNAILS said:

I'm not sure how this makes mathematical sense. I could be wrong here, but I think getting a 3.8 B20 will be very hard.

So let's assume you get an A+ in 10 courses before you graduate. This gives you 3.675 B20 at most (4.0 x10 + 3.35 x 10) divided by 20.

Let's say you get a few low A's and a few A+'s. 3.7 x 5 + 4.0 x 5 + 3.35 x 10 divided by 20. You are sitting at maybe a 3.6.

Even one B+ or less out of your next best 10 courses will drop you more into the 3.5 B20 range.

Doing the math is not my job, and I admit I am making this post without proper time to figure this out exactly. (I'm saying this respectfully!) But you might want to double check your realistic GPA expectations.

Reference: https://www.ouac.on.ca/guide/olsas-ryerson/ (go to "Requirements)

https://www.ouac.on.ca/guide/olsas-conversion-table/

I think Dal and  does 4.3. I didn't know how it worked at Ryerson. Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/23/2021 at 10:51 AM, Relentless2017 said:

There are only ever 10 articling students in a large corporate law firm, most of them being former summer students.  

Not interested in getting in the middle of this back and forth but this statement is not factual. Most large firms have many more than 10 articling students.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, NoHopeLeftLol said:

I think Dal and  does 4.3. I didn't know how it worked at Ryerson. Thanks.

Might you be calculating your GPA on the 4.3 scale?

Why don't you plug your courses into this GPA calculator made by @Ryn ?

https://lawapplicants.ca/grade/index

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, erinl2 said:

Not interested in getting in the middle of this back and forth but this statement is not factual. Most large firms have many more than 10 articling students.

https://precedentjd.com/hireback-watch/toronto-wide-hireback-numbers/

Okay, some have up to 20, but most have 10 and under. Regardless, I can imagine those that are hiring 20-30 articling students like Faskens is still a difficult  position to land. 

 

Edited by Relentless2017

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Relentless2017 I didn't remember who you were or what you had previously written here when I was responding to you yesterday.

In this thread alone, you have asserted the following:

-Exceptional ECs can offset a poor GPA in law school admissions (maybe to some extent at holistic schools but you massively overstated the extent of this--you even coupled it with talk of getting a high LSAT but the LSAT is much more important than ECs; stats are what matter in Canadian law school admissions and strong ECs can be helpful for marginal candidates but not otherwise uncompetitive ones)
-A paralegal degree and work experience fall into said category of exceptional ECs (just no)
-Bay Street jobs are extremely difficult and competitive to land, based on 1L recruit numbers and your firm's hiring numbers (no need to rehash why this is a bad take)

Even when you've written stuff that has some bit of qualified truth to it, you've greatly exaggerated things. You are also citing your experience working at a law firm in a non-lawyer and non-law student capacity as if that makes you some sort of authority on these things (and this rubs me the wrong way because 0Ls are going to listen to you as a result), and every time you've been challenged you've doubled down on your terrible takes on everything and moved the goalposts.

I'd suggest you ease up on giving people advice for the time being. And that you revisit this thread in a few years and see what you think of what you've written then.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Relentless2017 said:

https://precedentjd.com/hireback-watch/toronto-wide-hireback-numbers/

Okay, some have up to 20, but most have 10 and under. Regardless, I can imagine those that are hiring 20-30 articling students like Faskens is still a difficult  position to land. 

 

No. The first three large corporate firms I did a quick search for had more than 20. Please stop making definitive statements when you aren't knowledgable about every firm. The Precedent link is not a list of large corporate firms. I'm not disputing, or commenting on, the difficulty of securing a position at one of these firms.

I would recommend that any applicants who are interested in this, have a look at firm websites. It's very easy to learn about summer student and articling programs. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • On this site I regularly see people with LSAT scores 20-30 points lower than mine making ridiculous assertions about the amount of work that is supposedly required to get a top score. By contrast my personal experience was that the prep required to get a 99th percentile LSAT score consisted of learning basic logic game diagramming and writing a handful of practice tests. I see people with scores in the 150s knowing all the names of the different types of logical reasoning questions and discussing the logic behind them in terms I never learned and don't understand. All I know is if you put the test in front of me I intuitively understand what almost all of the answers are, but I couldn't do a good job of articulating why--the answers simply seem self-evident and to be taken for granted. Just chiming in because your statement squares with my experience (although I didn't reach 177). But by and large people with mediocre scores invariably claim that the LSAT is all about effort and just don't want to believe that innate aptitude has anything to do with it, because they tend to view it as an attack on their intelligence in general. (Just so I don't seem like a totally arrogant douche, everyone: for what it's worth I've put in serious effort trying to learn instruments and second languages and my innate aptitude in both of those areas is abysmal--I found such endeavors nearly impossible. Also the innate LSAT aptitude did not translate into innate law school aptitude, and I certainly would have preferred the latter. But yeah, the fact that I suck at other things but can effortlessly get an LSAT score in the 170s just emphasizes how much of it is innate.)
    • Play nice. I'm all for disagreeing with someone, but if we can't be civil and start name calling, it's not possible to have real discussion.
    • The vast majority of people that score 170+ and post here put in a fraction of the effort the people grinding through the 150s and low 160s do. And I’m sure a ton of those grinders put in as much effort as is humanly possible into studying without having an innate grasp of the LSAT. But the people scoring 177-180 for example? Probably putting in some of the least effort into studying.
    • This is what I'm talking about, no one is actually making an argument, it's name calling and non sequiturs 
    • I've taken 14 sociology courses, 12 at u of t and 2 at ryerson. I dropped out a while back and decided to go back to school because I was tired of working construction so I went to ryerson to finish my degree. 

×
×
  • Create New...