Nobody is reading your dumb as shit walls of text because nobody wants to engage in your idiotic straw man. Nobody here gives a shit about this argument you think you’re having about MMA. The stench of Ben Shapiro is all over you.
Tell me what is so wrong with what I said? Not it's stupid or name calling. The sociologists in the classroom literally make such arguments, I mean it's actually taken from my class. Do you think that there is no relationship between what people call excitement and their willingness to buy a fight card? Do you think my assertion that there is a relationship between people thinking there will be knockouts and their willingness to pay for fights is incorrect? Do you think that my assertion that laypeople tend to not want to pay for fights where they think they can possibly beat the fighter up is incorrect? Do you think by bringing up this example I am saying that any talk of the gender wage gap is flawed? Tell me here what is so bad, in an actual argument, do you think I am misrepresenting sociologists? Do you feel that my classroom experiences and my hearing people talk about are highly unrepresentative? Please tell me what is so stupid about it, i'm honestly asking because in the real world sociologists do say that it is the result of gender norms, even for things like fight examples.
I'm starting to question how much sociology @humbledman has actually taken, since they seem adamant on it not being a statistical discipline, despite statistics being a major part of generating and supporting /refuting social theories. I'm also curious why they are framing the argument as sociology versus conservatism. One is a field of study (where people may have political leanings), but the other is only a political philosophy. That's like contesting marine biology with anarcho-monarchism. And equally as silly.