Jump to content
MayG

UK Law Schools - Schools that offer Canadian law modules vs ones that don't

Recommended Posts

My apologies if this has already been asked (please direct me to the correct forum if that's the case). 

I am currently applying to law schools in the UK. I was advised that only Bangor, Leicester, Birmingham, Southampton, Hertforshire and City offer Canadian law modules. Yet, I found that in quite a few forums, many individuals are posting about other law schools such as Essex, Kent, etc. 

My main question is: Is it worth going to a UK law school which does not offer Canadian law modules? Im assuming if I do apply to a school like Kent or Essex (which apparently has higher rankings than some of the other schools) I would have to write more NCA exams. Are there any law schools that don't offer these Canadian courses that are worth applying to?

Thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the time to first read through the ocean of information in this sub regarding the impediments of a foreign legal education in the Canadian job market. 

I cannot speak to your original question regarding Canadian modules, but I can assure you that no one in Canada will care about how these schools are ranked. To the legal market here, it's Oxbridge, LSE, and everything else. 

You have a decent GPA. Have you maximized your LSAT attempts? Don't think you will save time and money going the UK route. There are significant barriers foreign trained law students face in Canada with respect to the licensing process and securing articling and lawyer positions. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response @Deadpool. Yes, I have been reading other forums and I do see that many people have advised against taking this route. 

To be honest, at this point I just want to apply before the deadlines and have that option open. Of course my goal is to get into a Canadian law school (which unfortunately hasn't been looking too promising) but I just want to keep this option open for now. 

When the time comes, Ill make a decision as to whether I want to wait another year and try again here. In the meantime, while I am applying I want to make sure that I have accurate information and make the right picks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 3.46 and 153. That was what I have when I applied and rejected by all schools back in 2011. (153 and 3.47)

If you can rewrite LSAT and get 7 points more, then you should have a better chance to get into a Canadian law school. 

Deadpool is correct about going to UK. Schools that offer Canadian law modules are intended to target and lure Canadian students. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you applying for Sept 2020? If so, I would just apply to the ones you mentioned. 

If you're applying for Fall 2021 I would take the LNAT and try to get into UCL, King's, LSE, Oxbridge etc. But as the other people before me mentioned unless you're going to a top school in the UK there really is no difference between Leicester & Kent.

I am headed to the UK in the fall and have done extensive research about all the school you mentioned, msg me if you have any questions! 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Yea my bad majority was the wrong term to use. However, if the rest of the 1L class responded I do think it is likely that the majority consensus would still be in favour of moving to Kingston. 
    • Almost everyone in the group was marked as having "seen" the post (~220 people) but only 85 responded, so in line with what @ChiasticWalrus said, there are definitely many students not reflected in the poll. Maybe the majority of people are still undecided, and/or people were reluctant to respond that they were staying home because so few others did so? I know I'm still not fully sure what I'm going to do yet given the unpredictable nature of the virus
    • Thanks for chiming in, @Twenty. It's reassuring to hear that someone else had the exact same train of thought that I did. I also see the option to stay home as a unique opportunity instead of as an outright negative. I appreciate the insight regarding studying as well. I'm glad to hear that a good deal of success boils down to independent study and that most other "techniques for success" are still possible through online means. I've always sort of favoured that method myself, so I'm definetely feeling much better about staying home. All the best to you in the upcoming year.
    • This is actually really interesting. Do you know if the numbers are similar for 2Ls/3Ls? My blind guess is that a larger proportion of upper years are willing to remain at home (though I would not be surprised if the majority still prefer in-person). The reasoning is that 0Ls/1Ls are super keen to start law school and be on campus, while seniors are less so.  @ChiasticWalrus I'm not a Queen's student (I'm an incoming 2L at another ON school), but a reason why I opted to take online classes was because if there is a second wave, everything will move online anyways. I've experienced both in-person and remote law school classes, did the cost-benefit analysis, and felt more comfortable staying with my parents. In some regards, I saw the option of taking classes online and staying at home as an opportunity I should not pass up (for both health and financial reasons).   In terms of being (academically) disadvantaged, studying in law school is such an independent process (i.e. learning how to read, analyze, and apply case law is something you learn by yourself) that as long as you keep up with (most of) your readings, obtain/create good outlines, read Getting to Maybe before finals, give yourself enough time to do practice questions and analyze sample answers (I found it really helpful to do practice finals with classmates and discuss our answers - these can be done online), I don't think you will be at a disadvantage. In-person lectures are great because you can have interesting class discussions, but based on my first semester of law school, there was no correlation between how engaging a class was and the grade I got for that class. 
    • This does help, thank you! I can't afford 7sage right now, but I'll keep it in mind for the future. I'll also take a look at Manhattan. Much appreciated.

×
×
  • Create New...