Jump to content
sman99

Articling Hireback 2020

Recommended Posts

Wait, didn't rashabon totally crap on Cassels? 😄

 

It's almost as if firm wide rankings are rather useless.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, pzabbythesecond said:

Wait, didn't rashabon totally crap on Cassels? 😄

 

It's almost as if firm wide rankings are rather useless.

No, I think that was maximumbob. 

My post was more in response to the poster a few days back who said there was bad news at Cassels.

 

Edited by easttowest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, pzabbythesecond said:

Wait, didn't rashabon totally crap on Cassels? 😄

 

It's almost as if firm wide rankings are rather useless.

 

8 minutes ago, easttowest said:

No, I think that was maximumbob. 

My post was more in response to the poster a few days back who said there was bad news at Cassels.

 

Easttowest = Rashabon... ? 😯 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, pzabbythesecond said:

Wait, didn't rashabon totally crap on Cassels? 😄

 

It's almost as if firm wide rankings are rather useless.

? What are you talking about?

I think the only thing I’ve ever really mentioned about them is that they made the guy who had a close relationship with Canopy Growth a partner in record time, but feel free to tell me if I’m wrong. Cassels actually benefited big time by being a smaller shop with less blue chip clients. Meant they could go all in on cannabis before the other big firms got comfortable taking on the work.

Also someone here who really hates the Seven Sisters moniker happens to work there.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rough numbers this year so far. I'm surprised to see that there are quite a few firms who haven't announced numbers yet (McCarthys, Dentons, Gowlings, BLG, etc.).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SpecterH said:

Rough numbers this year so far. I'm surprised to see that there are quite a few firms who haven't announced numbers yet (McCarthys, Dentons, Gowlings, BLG, etc.).

McCarthys hasn't even done hireback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're actually not that bad. Just not 100% almost across the board like recently. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, CoffeeandLaw said:

McCarthys hasn't even done hireback.

I know - that’s what I meant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, SpecterH said:

I know - that’s what I meant.

Oh, you grouped them in with firms who have all done hireback, so I thought you meant it's weird they haven't disclosed to precedent JD.

Edited by CoffeeandLaw
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, CoffeeandLaw said:

Oh, you grouped them in with firms who have all done hireback, so I thought you meant it's weird they haven't disclosed to precedent JD.

I didn’t even know those other firms did hireback yet. I’m clearly late to the party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

gowlings only hired back like half, bloodbath there

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, hmyo said:

gowlings only hired back like half, bloodbath there

That’s in line with their historical hireback rates – the last two years have been strong, but from 2012-2017 they hired back ~60% 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone have thoughts on Goldblatt's numbers? I'm a lowly 0L but it seems interesting that YoY their hire back numbers are less about 50% (2019,2020). This year they only hired back 1 of 5 and last year 3 of 6.

Is this just the norm for smaller firms i.e. they take on less students but are more selective in who they hire back therefore far more competitive to get an associate position?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 0LHopeful said:

Anyone have thoughts on Goldblatt's numbers? I'm a lowly 0L but it seems interesting that YoY their hire back numbers are less about 50% (2019,2020). This year they only hired back 1 of 5 and last year 3 of 6.

Is this just the norm for smaller firms i.e. they take on less students but are more selective in who they hire back therefore far more competitive to get an associate position?

I think it's fair to say that you'll have more variability in hireback numbers for smaller shops. It'll always be a business driven decision but fewer practice groups means fewer potential spots generally and that an associate departing, or hiring a lateral, can have a big impact on hireback relative to those same events in a big shop.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 0LHopeful said:

Anyone have thoughts on Goldblatt's numbers? I'm a lowly 0L but it seems interesting that YoY their hire back numbers are less about 50% (2019,2020). This year they only hired back 1 of 5 and last year 3 of 6.

Is this just the norm for smaller firms i.e. they take on less students but are more selective in who they hire back therefore far more competitive to get an associate position?

Every single person I know who articled there had no problems finding a labour law/union job after their articles.

Look at it this way. While Biglaw may seek to hire back most of their articling students, they know that many people will leave the firms within the first 5 years. Smaller and mid-sized firms when looking to hire back are looking for long-term potential and growth, not muscle to keep the work flowing. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, HammurabiTime said:

I think it's fair to say that you'll have more variability in hireback numbers for smaller shops. It'll always be a business driven decision but fewer practice groups means fewer potential spots generally and that an associate departing, or hiring a lateral, can have a big impact on hireback relative to those same events in a big shop.

 

19 minutes ago, Deadpool said:

Every single person I know who articled there had no problems finding a labour law/union job after their articles.

Look at it this way. While Biglaw may seek to hire back most of their articling students, they know that many people will leave the firms within the first 5 years. Smaller and mid-sized firms when looking to hire back are looking for long-term potential and growth, not muscle to keep the work flowing. 

Makes sense, thanks for the insights. I likely wouldn't have realized this is a potential "risk" in applying to established/leading mid size firms. Good to know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...