Jump to content
OnlyResident

Waitlisted U of T 2020

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Pls said:

Copied from the email: The wait list is not ranked, when a space becomes available we select the strongest of the waitlist candidates.

 

Yes, and again I say, that just because they don't divulge a ranked # doesn't mean that there isn't an internal ranking. How else are they determining the strongest candidate? 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody have an idea that how many students are in wait-listed? 100?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ppzz said:

Anybody have an idea that how many students are in wait-listed? 100?

lol there are 17 people who responded on this thread, so I would assume somewhere between 20-25 given the typical rate of response on this forum? I think it would be safe to assume that people who a) know about this forum and b) are waitlisted are likelier than both rejects and admits to list their status here, given that they (including myself) are generally anxious to gather as much information as possible and stay in the loop. This is just a hunch though

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also, in at least one past year, everyone on the waitlist eventually got accepted. There were five of them I think, at least on this forum. Given that all five got accepted, the waitlist was probably actually not that much bigger than five. So I think it should be fairly safe to infer that the waitlists aren't that huge in general

Edited by PolPhil
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Especially given the high rate of people who accept their u of t offer it wouldn’t make sense to have a waitlist of 100 people as that would assume/be required if almost 50% of the Total class size declines 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel this year they are being generous as i checked last year thread, wait-listed people seems being more competitive than me. All of them have LSAT higher than 165, and acceptable CGPA. Maybe because of the COVID-19. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, ppzz said:

I feel this year they are being generous as i checked last year thread, wait-listed people seems being more competitive than me. All of them have LSAT higher than 165, and acceptable CGPA. Maybe because of the COVID-19. 

Lots of people are rejected with high stats. High stats are certainly not a unique trait of u of t admits. Especially once you reach a certain threshold they don’t illustrate a significant difference in terms of “how smart/capable” you are. I assume that I made it onto the wait list bc my application was interesting (I don’t have a stellar lsat or gpa) not because they were “being generous”. Also we were waitlisted and most of the acceptances were made prior to COVID really being an issue in Canada. 

Edited by Pls
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/26/2020 at 1:09 PM, Pls said:

The realist in me is now thinking that they just want to know for sure if someone will be able to attend should they offer admission and they end up not receiving government assistance for whatever reason

I think there is a good chance that they may have a larger incoming class size compared to previous years because of COVID, likely to offset the loss in tuition from international students who pay almost $19,000 more than domestic students (last year domestic students paid $33,040 vs. international students paying $51,730). If this is true, more people would be accepted off of the waitlist than usual. This is just a guess though! And I agree with Pls for why they sent the email. They wouldn't want to accept someone off of the waitlist that is not interested in attending (and/or cannot pay for) law school this Fall, as it would defeat the purpose of them accepting more students to offset their losses (if this is their intention). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought, can they really discriminate based on our answer to number 5? It just seems wrong if they were to deny someone a spot because they applied for government assistance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, lucus3245 said:

Just a thought, can they really discriminate based on our answer to number 5? It just seems wrong if they were to deny someone a spot because they applied for government assistance

Not sure... I’m only skeptical bc I just don’t understand why it’s relevant to them 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, elee333 said:

I think there is a good chance that they may have a larger incoming class size compared to previous years because of COVID, likely to offset the loss in tuition from international students who pay almost $19,000 more than domestic students (last year domestic students paid $33,040 vs. international students paying $51,730). If this is true, more people would be accepted off of the waitlist than usual. This is just a guess though! And I agree with Pls for why they sent the email. They wouldn't want to accept someone off of the waitlist that is not interested in attending (and/or cannot pay for) law school this Fall, as it would defeat the purpose of them accepting more students to offset their losses (if this is their intention). 

The amount of money involved is negligible and I don't think they will take that into account when making a decision on admission.

 

    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, ossihlikesblue said:

I got a call two hours ago (that I missed) but the voicemail let me know that they're offering me a spot!

Congrats! Prob a dumb question, but are you accepting? Also, when do you have to respond by?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pls said:

Congrats! Prob a dumb question, but are you accepting? Also, when do you have to respond by?

Thanks! It's actually not a dumb question! I don't think I am so that should hopefully open up a spot for someone else. They said I have until June 7th to accept and to make the deposit.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pls said:

Congrats! Prob a dumb question, but are you accepting? Also, when do you have to respond by?

10/10 question!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ossihlikesblue said:

Thanks! It's actually not a dumb question! I don't think I am so that should hopefully open up a spot for someone else. They said I have until June 7th to accept and to make the deposit.

Thank you for giving us some more hope. All the best to you! 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got accepted u of t got call with offer two hours back!! Feeling blessed and grateful!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Yaziz said:

Got accepted u of t got call with offer two hours back!! Feeling blessed and grateful!!

Congrats. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ossihlikesblue said:

I got a call two hours ago (that I missed) but the voicemail let me know that they're offering me a spot!

Congrats. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • A few things, my man: -I don't think @JusticeLordDenning was making the sort of value judgement you read in to that. Asking how students fare outside the formal recruit is not saying that the formal recruit jobs are necessarily the best jobs out there. -Both the DOJ and provincial Crown prosecution service participate in the formal recruit, so that's a poor example to illustrate your point. "Jobs in the recruit" isn't synonymous with "BigLaw." -I highly doubt that there is a huge difference in the level of interest in the formal recruit between Canadian law schools in general, and especially between Queens and Western as a specific example. And just to be clear, I'd be the last person to boost BigLaw or claim that working at a smaller firm outside the GTA is somehow inferior.
    • Some of this is might be based on what I consider to be a false assumption:  That law students who secure jobs at big firms in an urban area have succeeded while those who do not have failed. For example, a Queens student may have the career goal of securing a foot in the door with the Crown in a rural area and a Western student may want to get into business law with a small firm in a medium sized city.
    • Having those two years working with members of Parliament is an added bonus, the significance of which is proportional to the nature of your role. You should get one or two acceptances from those law schools provided you keep your grades up. You seem like the type of person who will make the right decision about this. Good luck!
    • Probablement parce qu'ils n'ont pas reçu assez d'applications? J'espère quand même qu'ont va commencer à recevoir des réponses en mars...
    • On this site I regularly see people with LSAT scores 20-30 points lower than mine making ridiculous assertions about the amount of work that is supposedly required to get a top score. By contrast my personal experience was that the prep required to get a 99th percentile LSAT score consisted of learning basic logic game diagramming and writing a handful of practice tests. I see people with scores in the 150s knowing all the names of the different types of logical reasoning questions and discussing the logic behind them in terms I never learned and don't understand. All I know is if you put the test in front of me I intuitively understand what almost all of the answers are, but I couldn't do a good job of articulating why--the answers simply seem self-evident and to be taken for granted. Just chiming in because your statement squares with my experience (although I didn't reach 177). But by and large people with mediocre scores invariably claim that the LSAT is all about effort and just don't want to believe that innate aptitude has anything to do with it, because they tend to view it as an attack on their intelligence in general. (Just so I don't seem like a totally arrogant douche, everyone: for what it's worth I've put in serious effort trying to learn instruments and second languages and my innate aptitude in both of those areas is abysmal--I found such endeavors nearly impossible. Also the innate LSAT aptitude did not translate into innate law school aptitude, and I certainly would have preferred the latter. But yeah, the fact that I suck at other things but can effortlessly get an LSAT score in the 170s just emphasizes how much of it is innate. And the degree to which there are different kinds of intelligences that people have varying aptitudes for. The LSAT is irrelevant to me now in practical terms but I do find the subject interesting from a psychological perspective.)

×
×
  • Create New...