Jump to content

Chances of Acceptance with no LSAT

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

I have been lurking for the last couple months, but this is my first time posting.

I will be applying to McGill in the next week here, but I am scheduled to write the LSAT in January 2020 (the latest accepted test date). I worry that going through with the LSAT in January might limit my chances, as admissions will be offering spots as early as December, but my application will not be looked at until my LSAT scores are posted. 

To provide some background on myself: 

- I am currently in my fourth year of my Bachelors, with a CGPA of 3.75 (self-calculated with no class-dropping). Does anyone know if McGill drops any classes in the GPA conversion?

- I am a first generation Canadian (parents migrated from Peru) and I was enrolled in French immersion schools from elementary to graduating high-school (high school diploma in French and English). Therefore I can speak English, French, and Spanish.

- I believe my 2 LOR are strong and feel confident about my Personal Statement. 

My question is: what do you think my chances are of getting in if I apply with NO LSAT, given the information above?

Thanks in advance for any information or opinions you might have. :)  



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone feels confident about their LORs and extra curriculars so it's hard to gauge. Your GPA was below median when I was a student. Mine was only slightly higher and I was accepted without an LSAT but that was 2009, so YMMV. Half my family are first gen Canadians (I'm first gen Canadian born from my Dad's side) so we weren't all that different. McGill doesn't do any drops. It's right in their FAQ.

December admits are for exceptional candidates - think of it as a pre-admittance. Most students are accepted in late January and onwards. You run a risk for writing January as McGill clear states as follows:

" Candidates who do write the LSAT are strongly encouraged to do so by November of the year prior to the year for which they seek admission. Applications from candidates who register for the January LSAT will only be reviewed by the Admissions Committee when all required elements, including the January LSAT score, are received. Candidates who register for the January LSAT risk that, by the time the Committee reviews their application, there will no longer be a place to offer even if the Committee wishes to admit. "


  • Like 2

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Thank you for sharing this information- I found it helpful.

I think the best thing may be to postpone my LSAT and cross my fingers for McGill. Otherwise, some extra time to study for the LSAT could be a good thing. 

Thanks again.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you guys! Best of luck in the admissions cycle.  
    • Look, there is only one wrong question to ask about academic misconduct - and it's been asked here many times in the past. Do you really need to disclosure it? The answer is yes. Any time you are asked a direct question about this, you need to answer truthfully. Note that you'll also be asked when you apply to be licensed as a lawyer, assuming you get that far. Now kudos for the fact that you haven't asked that question, because when people do ask it often reveals a mindset that's not entirely in line with legal culture. But beyond answering this question which you haven't asked, no one here can comment definitively at all. I'm mainly answering to provide this context. I'm a criminal defence lawyer. And I'm frequently asked some variation of this question by clients - "will my past mistake stop me from doing X?" Again, it isn't often I have a definitive answer. But I've observed that many people who aren't defence lawyers like to get self-righteous when addressing this topic. It's human nature (though not the best part of human nature) to enjoy seeing other people suffer from mistakes that we ourselves have avoided. The Greeks understood this. And so in answer to an unanswerable question - how much will schools, the law society, etc. choose to care about this - it's likely you are going to get a lot of extreme replies that suggest you've permanently fucked your life. That doesn't make it true. I will observe that law schools have admitted students in the past who have been convicted of serious crimes, and so have law societies. Your individual situation is unique and I won't presume to suggest what will happen. But be honest in reply to any direct question - that's your obligation. How you choose to frame your experiences, or if you choose to highlight them at all beyond this, is entirely your choice. Don't lie about the past, because when you do that it creates new offences of dishonesty. But you also have no obligation to inhabit the identity full-time, as though you are permanently defined by your past. You're entitled to move on. And don't let anyone else imply otherwise. Good luck.
    • Ask for a coffee or lunch instead. Reiterate your interest in them and they should understand.
    • No one would be able to answer whether you have any chances at Canadian law schools or not. If you really reflect on your issues of academic misconduct and you are indeed serous about going to law schools, I would like to say that your personal statements may need to talk about your academic misconduct in the past and discuss how you personally or academically have grown by dealing with these wrongdoings. Good luck!  
    • How do I deal with conflicting dinner invitations?  I will be accepting the dinner with my first choice but I don't want to burn the other firms so early in the process.
  • Create New...