Jump to content
Newfoundland

H Needed for OCI for UofT Law

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

Okay but the average UofT student is probably more competitive than the average OsGoode student from the admissions point of view. It doesn't matter that they have more student. The fact of the matter is is that a firm is just as willing to hire 15 Osgoode student than 15 UofT students for their summer class. UofT makes it sounds like the brandname carries the most weight on Bay STreet than other school but it cleary does not as just as many Osgoode students are hired than UofT students meaning that the Osgoode name brand is just as strong or name brand doesn;t really matter

This is illogical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jwms said:

This is illogical.

First of , the class sizes are very similar. Second of, say that Firm Y hired 10 UofT and 10 Osgoode students, that is showing that the UofT name plate doesnt really matter much and within the firm 50% are UofT students and 50% are OSgoode so UofT is not really dominating Bay Street either as other students seem to think. Moreover, UofT is not really prestigious anyways in the grand scheme of things world wide. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ProfReader said:

Admissions or hiring?  I think that you mean hiring.  You are wrong.  Those numbers don't necessarily mean that firms are just as willing to hire Osgoode students.  Let's say that a firm has 100 Osgoode applications and 50 UofT applications and hires 5 students from each school.  Are you trying to tell me that those two things are equal?  Even if you were correct, all of this is not the point anyway.  You may do better at Osgoode you may not, making this hypothetical boost in grades a ridiculous reason to transfer.  Also, I doubt Osgoode would let you transfer at this point anyway.

I don't mean transfer. I mean starting afresh and defitnley not transfering at this point. As I said earlier, I would leave the profession in its entirety, especially after a prof said I wouldnt be good in being a lawyer after not doing well in the class. 

 

Okay, I see your point but Osgoode and UofT have like the same class sizes and even if they dont this means that the 6th student from UofT is not getting a job but the 5th person from Osgoode is. Also, at least for OCIs arnt you only competiting against each other from your own school? Also, just FYI Fasken hired like 1 UofT student and Osgoode sent more students this summer. Also, Osgoode did better than UofT for 1L Summer. I think UofT didn't send a single student to Davies 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

First of , the class sizes are very similar. 

Factually wrong.

2 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

Second of, say that Firm Y hired 10 UofT and 10 Osgoode students, that is showing that the UofT name plate doesnt really matter much and within the firm 50% are UofT students and 50% are OSgoode so UofT is not really dominating Bay Street either as other students seem to think.

Also wrong (but related to your first incorrect statement). Profreader above explained why your absolute #s of hires are meaningless. And I don't know any students who think UofT 'dominates' Bay Street; any student who does believe this is clearly misinformed.

2 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

Moreover, UofT is not really prestigious anyways in the grand scheme of things world wide. 

I don't know what this point has to do with anything. Who claimed that UofT was 'worldwide prestigious'? And what does that mean? What does global prestige matter, anyway? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
37 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

I don't mean transfer. I mean starting afresh and defitnley not transfering at this point. As I said earlier, I would leave the profession in its entirety, especially after a prof said I wouldnt be good in being a lawyer after not doing well in the class. 

 

Okay, I see your point but Osgoode and UofT have like the same class sizes and even if they dont this means that the 6th student from UofT is not getting a job but the 5th person from Osgoode is. Also, at least for OCIs arnt you only competiting against each other from your own school? Also, just FYI Fasken hired like 1 UofT student and Osgoode sent more students this summer. Also, Osgoode did better than UofT for 1L Summer. I think UofT didn't send a single student to Davies 

Starting afresh at another school on the assumption that you would get better grades and thus have better job prospects would be truly stupid.  Leaving the profession entirely isn't something that people can answer for you.  As for your "as I said earlier", this conversation would be much easier to follow if you hadn't spread it across multiple threads.

They don't have the same class sizes.  Around 210 versus around 290 last time I heard.  How many of those students applied for jobs is also relevant. 

Huh?  No, for OCIs you aren't only competing against others from your school.  That doesn't make sense. 

Your examples of single law firms in single years mean nothing at all.  I'm sure that in other years those numbers were completely different.  It is way too small a sample size to draw any conclusions from.

To echo the previous poster, no one cares about worldwide prestige.

Edited by ProfReader
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

I don't mean transfer. I mean starting afresh and defitnley not transfering at this point. As I said earlier, I would leave the profession in its entirety, especially after a prof said I wouldnt be good in being a lawyer after not doing well in the class. 

 

Okay, I see your point but Osgoode and UofT have like the same class sizes and even if they dont this means that the 6th student from UofT is not getting a job but the 5th person from Osgoode is. Also, at least for OCIs arnt you only competiting against each other from your own school? Also, just FYI Fasken hired like 1 UofT student and Osgoode sent more students this summer. Also, Osgoode did better than UofT for 1L Summer. I think UofT didn't send a single student to Davies 

The vast majority of your statements in this thread are factually wrong. Are you trolling here? If not, it's pretty embarrassing that you got an H even with this display of logic.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, jwms said:

Factually wrong.

Also wrong (but related to your first incorrect statement). Profreader above explained why your absolute #s of hires are meaningless. And I don't know any students who think UofT 'dominates' Bay Street; any student who does believe this is clearly misinformed.

I don't know what this point has to do with anything. Who claimed that UofT was 'worldwide prestigious'? And what does that mean? What does global prestige matter, anyway? 

1) Okay fine, but UofT only sent 98 and Osgoode sent 99 of its class to Bay via 2L Recruit.  UofT cant even send 1/2 of its students  and yet claims to be a leading law school. From what I heard, 40% of UofT OCI participants do not get a job out of the process. 40% is a lot of students. 

 

2) UofT claimed to be a leading institution and some upper-years at UofT seem to think that. (Obviously if you have a job and benefited from it than yeah you would think that). 

 

3)Doesn't UofT have the rep of like being a Bay Street feeder? And literally everyone in the hallways talks about NY or Bay sTreet firms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ProfReader said:

Starting afresh at another school on the assumption that you would get better grades and thus have better job prospects would be truly stupid.  Leaving the profession entirely isn't something that people can answer for you.  As for your "as I said earlier", this conversation would be much easier to follow if you hadn't spread it across multiple threads.

They don't have the same class sizes.  Around 210 versus around 290 last time I heard.  How many of those students applied for jobs is also relevant. 

Huh?  No, for OCIs you aren't only competing against others from your school.  That doesn't make sense. 

Your examples of single law firms in single years mean nothing at all.  I'm sure that other years those numbers were completely different.  It is way too small a sample size to draw any conclusions from.

To echo the previous poster, no one cares about worldwide prestige.

Fasken hired 15 summer students. 1 from UofT 6 from Osgoode, Osgoode is not 6 times larger than UofT if we are arguing about proportions. Osgoode had the edge at Fasken this recruit . What happened at Fasken that led to such a swing in the result. 

 

Okay, well I care about prestige. 

 

No OCIs are competing against your own school. Each firm at most will interview X students at UofT's OCI so obviously you are competing only with UofT students for that OCI interview slot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Newfoundland said:

1) Okay fine, but UofT only sent 98 and Osgoode sent 99 of its class to Bay via 2L Recruit.  UofT cant even send 1/2 of its students  and yet claims to be a leading law school.

2) UofT claimed to be a leading institution and some upper-years at UofT seem to think that. (Obviously if you have a job and benefited from it than yeah you would think that). 

Huh?  None of this makes sense.  You can't claim that "UofT can't [sic] even send 1/2 of its students" without knowing how many people applied.  Also, since when is Bay Street hiring the only mark of a leading law school?  I'm also not sure why you are getting upset about this now.  All of this information was freely available before you attended law school.  Caveat emptor.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

Fasken hired 15 summer students. 1 from UofT 6 from Osgoode, Osgoode is not 6 times larger than UofT if we are arguing about proportions. Osgoode had the edge at Fasken this recruit . What happened at Fasken that led to such a swing in the result. 

Okay, well I care about prestige. 

No OCIs are competing against your own school. Each firm at most will interview X students at UofT's OCI so obviously you are competing only with UofT students for that OCI interview slot. 

Again, you are talking about one firm in one year with a very small sample size, which means nothing.  Who knows what happened at Fasken?  Possibly just a fluke that they liked candidates from other schools.  Possibly their top UofT choices accepted offers at other firms.  We will never know.  But it is completely ridiculous for you to consider starting afresh or quitting on the basis of these types of statistics.

If you are so caught up on prestige, that's on you.  Others don't care.  And why would you possibly care about global prestige?  That has nothing to do with your employment prospects.

Do we know for a fact that firms don't interview more students from some schools than others?  If not, then you aren't really competing with people from your school in the way that you suggest.  Also, even if you are competing with students from your school for interview slots, you are definitely not competing with just them for job offers.

Edited by ProfReader
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

edited.

Edited by jwms
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ProfReader said:

Again, you are talking about one firm in one year, which means nothing.  Who knows what happened at Fasken?  Possibly just a fluke that they liked candidates from other schools.  Possibly their top UofT choices went elsewhere.  We will never know.  But it is completely ridiculous for you to consider starting afresh or quitting on the basis of these types of statistics.

If you are so caught up on prestige, that's on you.  Others don't.  And why would you possibly care about global prestige?  That has nothing to do with your employment prospects.

Do we know for a fact that firms don't interview more students from some schools than others?  If not, then you aren't really competing with people from your school in the way that you suggest.  Also, even if you are competing with students from your school for interview slots, you are definitely not competing with just them for job offers.

Okay I see the point about relative ratios. 

But do we know if UofT gives a boost for Bay Street? And what is the grade cut offs like for UofT to get an OCI slot for interview. I really dislike the new UofT grading system of H, HH, P  -- > it fosters a lot of stress and competition that you have peers outright saying 'if i give you my notes you might take away my future job' (someone literally said that to me) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

12 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

1) Okay fine, but UofT only sent 98 and Osgoode sent 99 of its class to Bay via 2L Recruit.  UofT cant even send 1/2 of its students  and yet claims to be a leading law school. From what I heard, 40% of UofT OCI participants do not get a job out of the process. 40% is a lot of students. 

Did you do ANY research before starting law school? Did you think UofT was a golden ticket into Bay Street? Nobody has ever claimed that it is. Not even Harvard/Yale/Stanford send 100% of their students to biglaw. UofT has the highest OCI placement in the country - is that not good enough?

Additionally, there are plenty of jobs outside of OCIs. 

Jeez, man. You have a really immature outlook on this whole thing. I hope you're trolling honestly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Newfoundland said:

Okay I see the point about relative ratios. 

But do we know if UofT gives a boost for Bay Street? And what is the grade cut offs like for UofT to get an OCI slot for interview. I really dislike the new UofT grading system of H, HH, P  -- > it fosters a lot of stress and competition that you have peers outright saying 'if i give you my notes you might take away my future job' (someone literally said that to me) 

Of course we don't know.  But we do know that if you went to another school, you may not get better grades at all.  And even if you did, Bay Street firms may or may not go deeper into the UofT class, rendering your better grades irrelevant.  Even if they don't prefer UofT, I think that we can be pretty confident that they don't prefer other schools, despite your insistence on repeatedly citing the irrelevant Faskens example.  Again, it would be foolish to sacrifice an entire year of law school (and the associated tuition) on the basis of these hypotheticals. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

Okay I see the point about relative ratios. 

But do we know if UofT gives a boost for Bay Street? And what is the grade cut offs like for UofT to get an OCI slot for interview. I really dislike the new UofT grading system of H, HH, P  -- > it fosters a lot of stress and competition that you have peers outright saying 'if i give you my notes you might take away my future job' (someone literally said that to me) 

This makes zero sense. The 'new' grading system (which is not at all new) does not really foster any more stress or competition than any other grading scheme. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jwms said:

This makes zero sense. The 'new' grading system (which is not at all new) does not really foster any more stress or competition than any other grading scheme. 

The system fosters people to game the system that I now regret since all Ps and Hs are the same. They will focus all their energy on 1 class and get a HH and take a P in other course whereas if you try in a course you may still end up as a P; afterall a p is 46%- to 100%.   That's why I didn't get a single HH and I think if i had done that I would be in a better position. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Newfoundland said:

Okay I see the point about relative ratios. 

But do we know if UofT gives a boost for Bay Street? And what is the grade cut offs like for UofT to get an OCI slot for interview. I really dislike the new UofT grading system of H, HH, P  -- > it fosters a lot of stress and competition that you have peers outright saying 'if i give you my notes you might take away my future job' (someone literally said that to me) 

For your own sanity, you should learn to block out the noise around you and in your head. All law students risk living in a tiny bubble, where each moment seems like the defining point of your future career. They're not. Trying to change schools based upon not being at the top of your class and getting your first pick of jobs would be a massive overreaction to what is essentially a commonplace, if disappointing experience. 

As others are pointing out, striking out during 1L and 2L OCIs is not the end of the world. It just means that you'll need to find a job the way that most law students do.

Edited by realpseudonym
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Newfoundland said:

The system fosters people to game the system that I now regret since all Ps and Hs are the same. They will focus all their energy on 1 class and get a HH and take a P in other course whereas if you try in a course you may still end up as a P; afterall a p is 46%- to 100%.   That's why I didn't get a single HH and I think if i had done that I would be in a better position. 

No one does this. You're trolling or have a very bizarre view of law school and what your peers are doing. In any event, I don't think this thread is particularly helpful to you (since you're not reading/digesting what anyone's telling you), and it's certainly harmful to any prospective law student reading this misinformation, so I'm out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jwms said:

No one does this. You're trolling or have a very bizarre view of law school and what your peers are doing. In any event, I don't think this thread is particularly helpful to you (since you're not reading/digesting what anyone's telling you), and it's certainly harmful to any prospective law student reading this misinformation, so I'm out.

My friend does it. He even told me to try it when he saw me studying for Property and told me to give Property a P to focus elsewhere. I am taking it in what you are all saying and I accepted that I was msitaken on the ratio; I thought Osgoode and UofT were roughly the same size. 

I disagree, I wish I had read that  most people do not get a job from 2L recruit before entering law school. I read what was on UofT website the emplyoment rate of 90%+ and thought that meant OCIs were pretty "easy" to get a job to get into that 90% stat. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I don't want to be that guy, but literally we have a professor, upper year law students, and lawyers on here trying to make a 1L student feel better; the OP's tactic is simply to dismiss everything being said here and engage in circular reasoning. This is a classic case of someone who needs to live and learn. Let them apply broadly and see what happens. Can't turn back the clock now. 

Edit: Newfoundland, this may come as a shock to you, but there are people going to law school for more than the chance to land a student position at a large corporate/commercial firm. A number of medalists and clerks I know went into litigation boutiques and practice areas like criminal, aboriginal, and immigration. Sounds like you may have gone to law school for the wrong reasons. Only you can answer that. 

Edited by Deadpool
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hi,   I was just wondering if my reference would need to write one general reference letter that is applicable to every school or a targeted reference letter to each school. On the OUAC website it says that only one version is allowed so I am pretty confused.    Thanks in advance for the help!  
    • Going to help Ryn out when I can. I have the same experiences as them.  The review teams do not have the previous files, but we can request the information from admin if we needed it.  Practically speaking though, the scenario you're worrying about will not happen. It's quite rare for us to look at your previous application.  That being said I've always been of the opinion that you should tell the committee about your experiences. No reason to remove them IMHO 
    • There are a lot of recent topics on this website that you can review that discuss ways a new call can obtain employment. I was called in June 2019 and got my current job off of contacting a partner from a firm that was hiring in one practice area and providing him with an application package. I then did two interview with them, as per normal. Other people I know tended to do the same thing, rather than relying on Indeed, etc., just because it is so competitive and unless you are a superstar, it can be hard to distinguish yourself. 
    • If OP went to TRU in 1L then UBC in 2L, I'd assume they just didn't have strong cover letters/resumes. I'm in 3L at TRU and received 9 Vancouver OCIs with the following grades: A-, B+, B+, B, B, B, B. I had heard rumours that transferring to UBC from TRU/UVic looks bad to employers unless you had a compelling reason to transfer (family issues, you got married, etc.). I have no idea how true that is, so yeah.
    • Its mostly hyperbole for the pace of it part, I don't really see myself holding a tin can and a sign that reads "Will review contracts for Food".  There is nothing wrong of course with teaching fundamental skills. Just borrowing a page from say, physics. They teach fundamental theories and its very important to. But its laterally supplanted with learning how to use sophisticated machinery, and now supplanted with learning how to design and program simulation models. We spend like, an hour a week learning to use Westlaw and Quicklaw which are the tools of yesterday. We learn nothing about how these tools are going to operate. But yes, case summaries have not changed. It literally went unchanged for over a decade. Not for criminal law obviously, but the summaries I looked at were virtually identical to mine in teaching ratios and so-on with the same cases used. My point wasn't that it isn't useful; but the way of teaching it has not adapted yet and this is IMO problematic.  Sorry I seem very bitter and so-on, but I am just kind of frustrated with how archaic some of the curriculum for law schools generally seems to be entering my second year. 
×
×
  • Create New...