Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Really upset to be waitlisted this early.

Applied access

cgpa 3.3

l2 3.54

lsat 159

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waitlisted today

LSAT 157, GPA 3.7, Masters student

Initially thought this was good but after reading this thread, I'm definitely confused lol.. anyone want to share why this might not be great or why it's good?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Waitlisted yesterday 

Cumulative = 3.79

L2 = 3.94

LSAT = 158

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, rwilli said:

Waitlisted today

LSAT 157, GPA 3.7, Masters student

Initially thought this was good but after reading this thread, I'm definitely confused lol.. anyone want to share why this might not be great or why it's good?

I don't think it's bad. All of my friends who applied last year who were waitlisted got accepted 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/18/2019 at 7:30 PM, AlN said:

I also just got waitlisted. Recieved the email today at 6:40pm. Cgpa 3.29, 154.

I was wondering if anyone has any insight on what this means. Is being waitlisted this early a good sign, or is there no indication and way to know if it will lead to a future acceptance. Doesn’t seem like there has been too many acceptances out for Windsor compared to other schools (basing off the acceptance thread)

I don't think there is a clear indication. In my personal experience, all of my friends who were waitlisted during this time got accepted (last year cycle). However, that could change? I'm not really sure. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, LuckyCommander said:

Received the email about 30¬†minutes ago. Not sure if I should be excited or not.ūüėĖ

I can't see this being a good thing. I'm not sure why they're waitlisting people before accepting all of their students. I mean, surely they have not received enough acceptances to fill a class already.

47 minutes ago, lawgal9098765 said:

I don't think it's bad. All of my friends who applied last year who were waitlisted got accepted 

This seems strange to me. What's the point of a waitlist if this is what happens?

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, thedraper said:

I can't see this being a good thing. I'm not sure why they're waitlisting people before accepting all of their students. I mean, surely they have not received enough acceptances to fill a class already.

This seems strange to me. What's the point of a waitlist if this is what happens?

I know that last year they got really behind on updating applications. Maybe this is just a way to keep the applications moving instead of having them stagnant? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, thedraper said:

I can't see this being a good thing. I'm not sure why they're waitlisting people before accepting all of their students. I mean, surely they have not received enough acceptances to fill a class already.

This seems strange to me. What's the point of a waitlist if this is what happens?

Windsor is weird. They basically accept every one and then they put a HUGE waitlist on until about Mid April. That’s when they decide to root out the less competitive people and reject them. Last year I was Waitlisted Feb 14, and was rejected sometime in April, and was told that they had too many competitive files. 

Apparently this is a very common Windsor thing. So being waitlisted early has no indication whether or not it is a good sign. Just sit back and cross your fingers and hope someone gives up their seat. 

  • Like 3
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, lawgal9098765 said:

I know that last year they got really behind on updating applications. Maybe this is just a way to keep the applications moving instead of having them stagnant? 

Certainly seems possible.

 

38 minutes ago, lindsn said:

Windsor is weird. They basically accept every one and then they put a HUGE waitlist on until about Mid April. That’s when they decide to root out the less competitive people and reject them. Last year I was Waitlisted Feb 14, and was rejected sometime in April, and was told that they had too many competitive files. 

ÔĽŅ Apparently this is a very common Windsor thing. So being waitlisted early has no indication whether or not it is a good sign. Just sit back and cross your fingers and hope someone gives up their seat.¬†

That's a really tedious way to do things. Oh well, it dosent change anything, the waiting continues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those waitlisted for regular JD, did your application disappear from the sign in page? Mine only shows the Dual JD as active application.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, natisa said:

For those waitlisted for regular JD, did your application disappear from the sign in page? Mine only shows the Dual JD as active application.

I just received the waitlist email. I then checked my application status on their website, and my application has disappeared. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, SallGoodMan said:

I just received the waitlist email. I then checked my application status on their website, and my application has disappeared. 

I'm assuming it'll come back up once it's updated because I got my email a few hours ago as well and when I checked, my application disappeared.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, natisa said:

For those waitlisted for regular JD, did your application disappear from the sign in page? Mine only shows the Dual JD as active application.

Yes. It is telling me that I have 'No Active Application.'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Update: if you log on now it should say that your status is waitlisted. When you click the exclamation mark this message pops-up "The program is currently full and your name has been placed on a wait list. You will be notified should space become available."

Let's hope for the best!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, LuckyCommander said:

Update: if you log on now it should say that your status is waitlisted. When you click the exclamation mark this message pops-up "The program is currently full and your name has been placed on a wait list. You will be notified should space become available."

Let's hope for the best!

I’d be so surprised if they actually filled up all the seats already without looking at all the applications. Surely it’s not actually full?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although Windsor considers it's applications through a holistic method, does anyone know how it works on waitlist? If you are waitlisted are you now placed on a list based on purely your stats??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Hopeful10101 said:

I’d be so surprised if they actually filled up all the seats already without looking at all the applications. Surely it’s not actually full?

Yeah, strange. I'm still under Pending Review

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, LuckyCommander said:

The program is currently ÔĽŅfulÔĽŅlÔĽŅ

What the fuck??

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You just completed your articles in insurance defense and yet claim to have vast knowledge in the field of medical and health law. You've also got an ¬†LLM that focused on 11 different topics unrelated to insurance or civil lit.¬† But the type of law you are really interested in is IP law. ¬† And you intend to tell¬†employers about your poly marriage?¬† During interviews I assume?¬† Only way it could be a red flag is if you told someone unless your last name is Blackmore.¬†¬†
    • The reason many 1Ls get crushed after grades come out is because they mistakenly carried the¬†"hard work means good grades" mentality into law school. The bolded part of your post is me pointing out that you're making the same mistake. What I think you really need to do is change how you prepare for exams. My advice to you FOLLOW AT YOUR OWN RISK I'm a fellow slow worker. When I prepared for midterms like everyone else, I got the same marks as everyone else. When I prepared for final exams like a slow worker, I¬†beat the curve in 6/7 courses. The only course where I didn't beat the curve¬†was also¬†the only class I made the mistake of not doing the aforementioned. Understand that you¬†can't do all of the assigned¬†work. It may take other people 1¬†hour¬†to do a 30 page reading while it takes you 4 hours (I personally¬†need to read every word on the page). Doing all of the¬†assigned work is just not feasible for you because its not an efficient use of time.¬†There is absolutely no shame in admitting this or accepting this. Doing all of the assigned¬†work is just one¬†of many different ways to prepare for the exam. You should let my exam grade determine whether your unique method of preparation is right or wrong. Understand that doing all of the¬†assigned¬†work doesn't mean you¬†shouldn't be doing any work or even less work, it just means you¬†should be doing the work that helps you¬†best prepare for the exam. Doing the readings¬†- Your main focus should be to make the most efficient use of your time (i.e. doing the type of work that helps you, as an individual, best prepare for the exam) First, check the syllabus to understand the place of this reading in the class (you'd be surprised how many people overlook the value of the course syllabus). The question here is: what am I reading? What topic is this reading on? How many days will you be dealing with this topic? How many pages is it? Is the topic a standalone topic or one piece of a bigger topic? This will give you a rough idea of how much time and concern you should give to this topic and also generally primes you¬†for the work you need to do. Second, very briefly skim the reading while paying attention to the structure of the reading. Read the headings, intros, conclusions, etc. This will help you understand the¬†skeleton of the reading.¬† Third, once you understand what you're reading (i.e. after completing the first two steps) your next question is: why¬†am I reading this? Why has the professor assigned this reading? In other words, what does your professor want you, as a student, to get out of this reading for the purposes of their class?¬†To answer these questions, look to course summaries/CANs¬†from upper years who have taken the same course with the same professor.¬† Fourth, now you know what you're reading and why you're reading it. The question now here is: what does this reading say about that?¬†If you're a person who's¬†comfortable relying on a summary/CAN, then¬†rely on your summaries/CANs to provide¬†answer the answer to this question. If you're a person who's¬†more comfortable doing the reading, then let the summaries/CANs create the signposts of¬†what's important in the reading so you can focus on that and allocate your time effectively.¬† For example, if you're dealing with the topic of sexual assault in¬†1L criminal law, then you're probably going to want to read all of Ewanchuk and only focus on the bare essentials in every other case (e.g. R v Chase - only matters because it tells us how to interpret the sexual nature element of the AR; R v Cuerrier - only matters because it tells us when fraud vitiates consent and what¬†L'Heureux Dube and McLachlin¬†say in their respective dissents,¬†respectfully, doesn't matter for the strict purpose of your exam unless your professor cares about policy; R v Mabior - only matters because it tells us when non-disclosure of HIV status vitiates consent/constitutes fraud; R v JA - only matters because it tells us to how interpret consent and, respectfully, Fish's dissent doesn't matter unless your professor cares about policy; etc)¬† Lectures¬†- The purpose of lectures isn't for the professor to spoon-feed¬†you the material, for you to practice your skills as a typist and¬†copy the lecture verbatim or for you to get your¬†online Christmas shopping done. The purpose of the lecture is for the professor to: Confirm to you¬†that you're on the right track (i.e. you've done the aforementioned Reading stage correctly and understand what the topic is, why you're doing the reading, and that you know what you need to know) Clarify anything in the readings and/or correct any mistakes/things missing from your understanding/notes or the summaries/CANs you've relied on Provide you with their unique perspective/opinion/approach to the topic at hand. You're going to keep this in mind when writing your exam in order to cater to their beliefs, prejudices. For example, if you have a feminist professor, don't argue that sex work should be criminalized on an exam. Present both sides to the argument, and in one sentence say that you support it even if you don't. As a future lawyer, you're going to be arguing a lot of things you don't agree with or believe in for your own personal gain. Might as well start early¬† ¬†Give you any hints about the exam. Professors notice if/when the herd thins out during the school¬†year and some times will be inclined to reward students for attending. There have been multiple times that I've gotten useful hints about exams from a professor simply for being present during a boring lecture in the middle of October Exams¬†-¬†Exam-writing is a skill. Learn it. Read books on how to develop the skill. My recommendation is "Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades" by Alex Schimel. Create your own outline. In your 5 to 15 page outline, you should have¬†every piece of the "what you need to know" part of each of your readings. There should be¬†absolutely no superfluous bullshit, fluff or fat on your outline. You've literally condensed the entire course into those 5 to 15 pages. Your casebook, other peoples outlines/CANs, etc were all just tools for you to arrive at your own outline.¬† Learn your outline cold. I mean cold.¬†This doesn't only mean just memorizing it. You should be able to open up ExamSoft and type out the blackletter law part of your future exam answer on demand and at near-lightning speed. The only class that I actually did this properly for was the one I finished at the top¬†(and despite missing a major issue on the exam) and the other class that I did this, but sort of half-assed, I¬†got an A- despite writing one¬†paragraph¬†for a question worth 33% question because I blanked out. Once you've learned the outline cold, take a few¬†old exam questions and do timed exams on ExamSoft. Your focus is to type out the blackletter law as you've been doing and then actually apply it to the facts.¬†Review your answer by yourself, then with a professor (if you can reach them/they'll allow this) and finally compare against old exam answers. Many people will disagree with this but once you do a few of these timed exams, you'll start to notice repeating patterns in terms of the issues tested, answer structures, etc¬†(there can only be so many and also many professors are creatures of habit).¬†
    • Had a similar thing happen: What can you tell me about person X? Should I know person X? They mentioned you in their interview... I have no idea who this person is...
×
×
  • Create New...