Jump to content
Lawguy767

Summaries/outlines/CANs

Recommended Posts

I am reentering practice and I need a quick refresher. Are there any sites where I could download summaries? Law school doesn't matter as long as they are recent. Looking for admin, constitutional and civil procedure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a terrifying thread. Read Halsbury's or Hogg or another textbook. Don't rely on freaking law students' summaries and outlines of their law school courses FOR PRACTICE.

  • Like 7
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm  not....I'm looking to read them to get a general lay of the land from which i would do my own research and further study. These courses are taught by professors who cover topical/recent cases and issues, which is why I'd want to have a look at them. This would be a basic starting point and that's all 

Ffs get off your high horse and calm down.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Lawguy767 said:

I'm  not....I'm looking to read them to get a general lay of the land from which i would do my own research and further study. These courses are taught by professors who cover topical/recent cases and issues, which is why I'd want to have a look at them. This would be a basic starting point and that's all 

Ffs get off your high horse and calm down.

Westlaw CLE will do a far better job at doing that for you. Supplement that with the leading cases, then textbooks by leading academics.

I don't trust student summaries for my final exams....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Lawguy767 said:

I'm  not....I'm looking to read them to get a general lay of the land from which i would do my own research and further study. These courses are taught by professors who cover topical/recent cases and issues, which is why I'd want to have a look at them. This would be a basic starting point and that's all 

Ffs get off your high horse and calm down.

That's literally what a textbook is for. There's literally no other discipline or situation where someone would ask for a student's notes to get the lay of the land in an area.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I mean, I have looked at my old notes that I had as a very preliminary look at research. I practice a very different kind of law than Rashabon and I agree that I'm a bit... horrified? that a lawyer would want access to law school notes to re-enter practice. At least pretend to try and look at Canlii Connects or reputable lawyer blogs for the quick refresher. There are also CLEs to address refreshers/introductions to areas of law.

I mean, one of our basic obligations is "competence to practice" and looking at a 10 page summary isn't giving you that.

Edited by artsydork
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, artsydork said:

I mean, I have looked at my old notes that I had as a very preliminary look at research. I practice a very different kind of law than Rashabon and I agree that I'm a bit... horrified? that a lawyer would want access to law school notes to re-enter practice. At least pretend to try and look at Canlii Connects or reputable lawyer blogs for the quick refresher. There are also CLEs to address refreshers/introductions to areas of law.

I mean, one of our basic obligations is "competence to practice" and looking at a 10 page summary isn't giving you that.

I review my old Civil Procedure notes from time to time as a general refresher on the rules. I find it helps to keep my memory fresh, however, if I have a live issue to research I’d go to the rules directly, then secondary sources and so forth. 

Old notes can help in a general sense as a refresher and help point you in the right direction, but obviously look to more modern relevant sources when working on a file. 

Ignore the arrogance on this thread - there’s a lot of it. Tune them out and do what’s best for you and your clients. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, Hqjet said:

I review my old Civil Procedure notes from time to time as a general refresher on the rules. I find it helps to keep my memory fresh, however, if I have a live issue to research I’d go to the rules directly, then secondary sources and so forth. 

Old notes can help in a general sense as a refresher and help point you in the right direction, but obviously look to more modern relevant sources when working on a file. 

Ignore the arrogance on this thread - there’s a lot of it. Tune them out and do what’s best for you and your clients. 

Just so that we're all on the same page:

Arrogance: having or revealing an exaggerated sense of one's own importance or abilities.

Rasha's comment boils down to "Don't rely on summaries - use a textbook"
Pzabby is "Use Westlaw CLE"
Mine "Artsydork is super cool. Also, what Rasha said"
OP "Don't judge me!"
HQ "I look at notes as a start but then do actual research"
 
The only arrogance I see is a lawyer that thinks they don't need to have an actual functional knowledge of law. And summaries are dated - I graduated in 2013 - so much has changed in my practice since then. Then the issue of summaries/cans is that certain elements of a case may not have been researched. Plus the student could have actually had the issue wrong. 
 
Sources are important.
Edited by artsydork
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had occasions where I've been talking through legal issues and had a "I think I remember there was a case where the Court held x" moment. I then look through my notes and voila, there's the case. Obviously, I'm still reading the case, noting it up to make sure it's good law, and doing further research into relevant sources, but notes can be helpful to an extent, however limited. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, artsydork said:

Just so that we're all on the same page:

Arrogance: having or revealing an exaggerated sense of one's own importance or abilities.

Rasha's comment boils down to "Don't rely on summaries - use a textbook"
Pzabby is "Use Westlaw CLE"
Mine "Artsydork is super cool. Also, what Rasha said"
OP "Don't judge me!"
HQ "I look at notes as a start but then do actual research"
 
The only arrogance I see is a lawyer that thinks they don't need to have an actual functional knowledge of law. And summaries are dated - I graduated in 2013 - so much has changed in my practice since then. Then the issue of summaries/cans is that certain elements of a case may not have been researched. Plus the student could have actually had the issue wrong. 
 
Sources are important.

Right and you’ve just nailed the problem on its head. It’s immediately shutting down the ideas of others as being wrong or terrible or backward and that x knows best. That’s what I’m seeing per your comment and the comment of others on this thread and this site in general. 

You’ll notice how I offered my own experience, suggested the idea of OP and offered an analysis as to its merits, rather than automatically shitting on him. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

2 hours ago, Hqjet said:

Right and you’ve just nailed the problem on its head. It’s immediately shutting down the ideas of others as being wrong or terrible or backward and that x knows best. That’s what I’m seeing per your comment and the comment of others on this thread and this site in general. 

You’ll notice how I offered my own experience, suggested the idea of OP and offered an analysis as to its merits, rather than automatically shitting on him. 

k

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • If you do end up deciding to enter the next cycle, try sitting down and writing without filtering yourself. Just write about why you want to study law, try to answer any suggested guidelines that the school has provided, then edit it into something you would want to submit. There is really no formula to this, or else everyone could simply write exactly what each school wants to hear. I didn't tailor my personal statement to any particular school and it was fine. Others may have tailored theirs specifically to each school and I'm sure it would still be fine. Precisely because there is no formula, just different individuals expressing their thoughts in different ways. 
    • I don't think Chelsea Hotel is a usual testing centre, as it wasn't listed in the list of testing centres. This is my 3rd write and it's the first time I'm seeing it offered. 
    • Thank you so much! Ah, I hope my professors don't mind reading all of mine. Good thing they can just submit the same letter!  That's a good point! I will give them a heads up a few weeks in advance then. I hope you ended up at your preferred school :). 
    • Do you want to work in TO for a few years before going back, or do you want to go back ASAP?  
    • Your personal statement is a two-fold test, meant to confirm that you can use the English language in a way that isn't embarrassing, and that you can discuss a relatively straight-forward topic without becoming ridiculous. You don't need to be Oliver Twist, in either style or substance. If you try, you'll almost certainly achieve a negative result. There may be the odd applicant to law school who really did escape war-torn Syria in the trunk of a car, or who has the narrative style to pull off some exceptional piece of writing. Everyone else is just a reasonably accomplished undergrad who wants to study law. And that's all you need to be. Seriously. Stop over-thinking this. Just tell them why you want to go to law school.
×
×
  • Create New...