Jump to content
Euroguy18

Tax Law and Math?

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone, 

I'm curious to know how relevant math skills are for the practice of tax law (tax litigation and/or tax planning). Tax law is a field that could potentially interest me going forward, but I feel that my arts background might limit my ability to succeed in this particular area of the law. 

If one doesn't have a business or economics degree, how would this impact one's chances for succeeding in tax law courses in law school and successfully practicing tax law as a lawyer? 

Is a business/economics/accounting background a necessary condition for the practice of tax law? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also curious about this. I did an arts degree as well but took some advanced mathematics and statistics courses but no accounting. Curious of what level mathematical proficiency would be required for tax law courses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't much math involved beyond basic algebra. You're not an accountant (though they don't need much complex math either).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As someone who specialized in accounting in university and is currently pursuing his CPA, I can attest to the fact that there isn't much math involved when it comes to tax. I don't know too much about the differences between the responsibilities of tax accountants and tax lawyers, but so far most of it is knowing your way around the Income Tax Act. All relevant math relating to tax planning at least can be done simply on calculators, and as stated above, the most advanced math related calculation I've done is basic algebra relating to returns on investments.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, PatarQ said:

As someone who specialized in accounting in university and is currently pursuing his CPA, I can attest to the fact that there isn't much math involved when it comes to tax. I don't know too much about the differences between the responsibilities of tax accountants and tax lawyers, but so far most of it is knowing your way around the Income Tax Act. All relevant math relating to tax planning at least can be done simply on calculators, and as stated above, the most advanced math related calculation I've done is basic algebra relating to returns on investments.

Thanks for this 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
15 hours ago, PatarQ said:

 I don't know too much about the differences between the responsibilities of tax accountants and tax lawyers, but so far most of it is knowing your way around the Income Tax Act.

I'm not 100% sure either and most of my day is spent on tax work. Perhaps @Mal or some of the other tax practitioners can chime in. But the basic gist of it, at least from the work I do, is that tax planning lawyers interpret the law and its applications, and accountants will crunch the numbers based on the interpretations.

For example: Setting up a pipeline transaction - lawyers will draft the documents (corporate resolutions, share purchase agreements etc), based on their interpretation of the law (section 85 rollovers, 51 exchanges, etc). The accountants will then do their number thing and submit all of the paper work for tax reporting.

EDIT: But then I've also worked on transactions where CPAs dictate the steps and what needs to be drafted and we provide some input. So things get blurry there. But I haven't really seen CPA's interpret the law.

Edited by setto

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

FWIW, out of the 6 "key contacts" from Osler's tax page, only 2 have Bcoms while the other 4 have BAs. I mean, the BA could technically be math (or comp sci or even software engineering if schools are weird like McGill). But yeah. The 3 tax lawyers I know were all non-science BAs.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need a math background to do tax.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, kurrika said:

You don't need a math background to do tax.

Can you chime in on a good answer for the accountant or CPA responsibilities vs those of a tax lawyer? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it depends on what you want to do in tax law. If you want to legislate policies, then no, I don't think you need to be good at math. However, if you are doing estate planning or anything related to trusts, from what tax lawyers have told me, it is better to have a business/accounting background. A CPA does similar work to a tax lawyer from what I understood based on my inquiries. Having your CPA designation will make you a much stronger tax lawyer as will experience in audit (I do not really understand why the latter is so). A CPA would do the income-tax filling whereas the lawyer would do the memos and paperwork. There is a lot of overlap though (also, I am speaking about differences at the partner-level). Tax lawyers may work at accounting firms but CPAs cannot work at a law firm. So, overall, you will be a much stronger tax lawyer if you have an accounting background but it is not a necessity to pursue tax law. It may also depend on your individual strengths and how fast you can catch onto things. 

Disclaimer: this is all based on what I was told by tax lawyers and CPA tax accountants. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, setto said:

Can you chime in on a good answer for the accountant or CPA responsibilities vs those of a tax lawyer? 

I'm not the right guy for that.  I make new tax laws rather than give advice on them out in the real world.

 

 

Edited by kurrika
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Few things in finance require the ability to do complex calculations. Most calculations are done in excel, and you just need a really solid grasp of basic mathematics. Even the CFA exams, recognised as one of the hardest exams in finance doesn’t require advanced math skills. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a difference between tax planning and tax avoidance.

Tax planning involves very basic algebra.

Tax avoidance involves advanced calculus.

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Rumpy said:

There is a difference between tax planning and tax avoidance.

Tax planning involves very basic algebra.

Tax avoidance involves advanced calculus.

 

Advanced calculus on the part of the accountant or the lawyer? 

What would a lawyer practicing tax avoidance for their clients do exactly? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You don't need any accounting or math background to practice tax law. You just need to know about tax law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's pretty basic math for the most part.

Occasionally, I have found you'll run into some pretty advanced tax "minimizing" (read: avoidance) concepts. But you're not doing the math here. Your job is to understand enough of how it works to advise on/litigate the legal issues. But you'll usually have an accountant or someone do the very mathy parts of it. Your job is still first and foremost zi law.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I tell my clients when it comes to the exact numbers, get your accountant to do it, because if you as me, I'm more expensive, and I'll probably get it wrong!

For a tax lawyer, you want to have financial literacy skills. Being able to read financial statements or a balance sheet is much more important than worrying about doing the calculations.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for what tax accountants do vs tax lawyers, the short answer is the same thing, in terms of planning, advising, etc. Accountants are always involved at the beginning, the lawyers sometimes. The main difference is that the accountants will do the number crunching and tax compliance (filing elections, returns, etc.) and the lawyers do the 'execution' (i.e. legal compliance such as resolutions, agreements, etc.)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Chambertin said:

As for what tax accountants do vs tax lawyers, the short answer is the same thing, in terms of planning, advising, etc. Accountants are always involved at the beginning, the lawyers sometimes. The main difference is that the accountants will do the number crunching and tax compliance (filing elections, returns, etc.) and the lawyers do the 'execution' (i.e. legal compliance such as resolutions, agreements, etc.)

 

This reminds me of a similar question I have regarding a tax avoidance/estate planning/asset protection practice. Would such a practice be confined to the major Canadian cities (I.e., Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, Calgary)? Would other fairly large (mid tier) cities like Edmonton, Winnipeg, etc. have a decent market for such services? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I don't think Chelsea Hotel is a usual testing centre, as it wasn't listed in the list of testing centres. This is my 3rd write and it's the first time I'm seeing it offered. 
    • Thank you so much! Ah, I hope my professors don't mind reading all of mine. Good thing they can just submit the same letter!  That's a good point! I will give them a heads up a few weeks in advance then. I hope you ended up at your preferred school :). 
    • Do you want to work in TO for a few years before going back, or do you want to go back ASAP?  
    • Your personal statement is a two-fold test, meant to confirm that you can use the English language in a way that isn't embarrassing, and that you can discuss a relatively straight-forward topic without becoming ridiculous. You don't need to be Oliver Twist, in either style or substance. If you try, you'll almost certainly achieve a negative result. There may be the odd applicant to law school who really did escape war-torn Syria in the trunk of a car, or who has the narrative style to pull off some exceptional piece of writing. Everyone else is just a reasonably accomplished undergrad who wants to study law. And that's all you need to be. Seriously. Stop over-thinking this. Just tell them why you want to go to law school.
    • Exploring your interests In 1L, variety in terms of course offerings doesn't really matter. You'll generally be taking the same foundational course whether you're at Ottawa or Western. However, another thing to maybe consider is that certain schools have better professors in certain areas. In 1L, what would definitely matter in relation to exploring your interests are the extracurriculars being offered (clinics, clubs, etc). Look into what both schools have to offer.  After 1L is when variety in course offerings really matter in terms of exploring your interests. I would say that, on this point, Ottawa is the better choice. Western is a more conservative, pro-business school. There is corporate law and then there is everything else. This isn't just my opinion as Western has made a concerted effort to bill itself as the premier business law school in Canada: Source: https://law.uwo.ca/future_students/business_law/ Social life/environment Western: more tight-knit, conservative, preppy "bro" vibe, less diverse student body (may be conjecture though) Ottawa: less tight-knit, liberal, social justice/progressive vibe, more diverse student body These are just my observations so take it for what you want Employment prospects Broadly speaking, Western will generally be better for job prospects in Toronto, if Toronto means Bay Street. Your grades, resume, personality, connections, etc are ultimately what really matter in terms of your job prospects. However, I would still give Western the edge here. Location Unless you have existing connections to London or like living in a college town, Ottawa is the clear winner here. More things to do, more things going on and, without a doubt, advantages coming from being the seat of the federal government. Ottawa is also close to Montreal so you'll have that avenue open if you want to visit for fun or work. 
×
×
  • Create New...