Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm sure you will get a lot of Apple iFanboys telling you how great their Mac is, but for what you use strictly for law school there is no need to spend the extra money. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This doesn't relate to law school, but one downside of having a Macbook is that when you get a job at a law firm you wont be able to hook up your macbook to the firms network/computer system (you know what I mean) because those are configured for PC. For example I cannot access the firms servers from anywhere offsite, whereas I could if I had a PC laptop. Although many firms will give you a laptop, some will not. And even if they do, it might be an old laptop that is not very easy to use, as was my case. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should have posted something less controversial like "Israel vs Palestine".

I liked my Mac during lawschool. No particular reason and gave no discernable advantage considering the Exam4 software at U of A worked on both.

When I started articling, I couldn't use my personal computer for security reasons. So maybe consider that if you are going to break the bank on a laptop - some firms will provide you with one and your lawschool setup will turn into a Netflix station for the bathtub.

  • Haha 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I've been considering a move to PC from my 8-year-old MacBook as I figured the Windows platform will be universal in both classroom and professional settings. The last thing I want to deal with during 1L is to accommodate an Apple OS. 

Given not all keyboards are created equal, is it worth (in your opinions) specifically targeting a laptop with a high quality keyboard and typing experience (for exams..)?    

Edited by SufficientCondition

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, shawniebear said:

This doesn't relate to law school, but one downside of having a Macbook is that when you get a job at a law firm you wont be able to hook up your macbook to the firms network/computer system (you know what I mean) because those are configured for PC. For example I cannot access the firms servers from anywhere offsite, whereas I could if I had a PC laptop. Although many firms will give you a laptop, some will not. And even if they do, it might be an old laptop that is not very easy to use, as was my case. 

This is not a global rule and if a law firm can't work with a Macbook they have some shoddy and low rent IT practices. My firm as well as plenty of small firms I am familiar with have easy offsite access for Macbook computers. If your firm can't set up a VPN that connects to a citrix or other software based instance of Windows, they might as well still be working with typewriters. This doesn't apply to tiny firms of a couple to a handful of people because in that case it may not make financial sense to do so.

I've used a Macbook for years, particularly because I got a free, full replacement partway through law school and haven't had to upgrade in a long time. It was fine for law school and has been fine for practice as well.

Edited by Rashabon
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone encounter issues with PCs, especially with exam software? I specifically have a Surface Pro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Aschenbach said:

Anyone encounter issues with PCs, especially with exam software? I specifically have a Surface Pro.

Someone in my year had no issues with a surface pro and the U of A software (which I think is the same for many other schools - Exam4).

You can always call the IT people at the faculty. They are super helpful with questions like this AND don't forget to keep them in mind for repairs.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used an HP during my undergrad, then bought another for law school ($700 gets you about 4 years). I'm more familiar with windows, so it was nicer for me. Had I bought a Macbook, I wouldn't have known how to use it, and wouldn't have wanted to take the time to figure it out with everything else going on.

On that note, if you're more comfortable with a PC, go with that; if you're more comfortable with a Mac, go with that. I saw a healthy mix in class, but I would say there were more Apples than PCs; just an observation. Couldn't tell you why that was.

I think, ultimately, it boils down to just general preferences; I don't think there's any particular considerations for law and law school. My biggest factors were cost and comfort, so I went with the HP laptop with the bigger screen.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a solo practitioner with a full time law clerk and part time assistant, and even I have a set up that can accommodate either PC or Mac logging in through the VPN. Just buy whatever you like. The exam software will work on either, its been like 15 or 20 years since MS Office became available for Mac too, and there is no reason to go with one over the other except for cost IMO. Go to the store, see what you like, make purchase. Done! :)

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, ericontario said:

I'm a solo practitioner with a full time law clerk and part time assistant, and even I have a set up that can accommodate either PC or Mac logging in through the VPN. Just buy whatever you like. The exam software will work on either, its been like 15 or 20 years since MS Office became available for Mac too, and there is no reason to go with one over the other except for cost IMO. Go to the store, see what you like, make purchase. Done! :)

I feel like I should point out that MS Office has been available for Mac from the very beginning.  Microsoft has been a Mac software developer from pretty much day one.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/21/2019 at 10:28 AM, shawniebear said:

This doesn't relate to law school, but one downside of having a Macbook is that when you get a job at a law firm you wont be able to hook up your macbook to the firms network/computer system (you know what I mean) because those are configured for PC. For example I cannot access the firms servers from anywhere offsite, whereas I could if I had a PC laptop. Although many firms will give you a laptop, some will not. And even if they do, it might be an old laptop that is not very easy to use, as was my case. 

I don't think this true for most of the big firms. Just asked a few friends and no one with a mac has any problems logging in remotely. I don't think the choice matters all that much. I love my mac mainly because 1) nothing ever goes wrong and 2) if it ever does, apple makes it incredibly easy to fix and will give you a replacement while its being fixed. I am reckless with downloads and do pretty much everything wrong from a cyber security perspective and I've never encountered a virus since having a mac. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Malicious Prosecutor said:

I feel like I should point out that MS Office has been available for Mac from the very beginning.  Microsoft has been a Mac software developer from pretty much day one.

Alright then, there you go. You could even buy a mac from 1990 for law school if you want. Although I wouldn't join Malicious Prosecutor in recommending that ;) How will you stream Netflix between classes? 

Edited by ericontario

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, CoffeeandLaw said:

I don't think this true for most of the big firms. Just asked a few friends and no one with a mac has any problems logging in remotely. I don't think the choice matters all that much. I love my mac mainly because 1) nothing ever goes wrong and 2) if it ever does, apple makes it incredibly easy to fix and will give you a replacement while its being fixed. I am reckless with downloads and do pretty much everything wrong from a cyber security perspective and I've never encountered a virus since having a mac. 

Ya I probably should have mentioned that the firm I work at is a small firm. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The exam software was slightly better on Macs as of 2013. Mac Microsoft Office still has menus if you're like me and grew up with them. And Macs are less susceptible to malware but definitely not immune.

But Mac computers have a lot of compatibility problems for things like games. Blizzard releases Mac versions but Mac gaming feels like its kind of stalled compared to when they initially went Intel. Also after Steve Jobs died the company hasn't really focused on their computers and it generally feels like they aren't as good as they were before. If you can live without menus then get a windows laptop. Basically if your laptop is going to be your main computer get a windows laptop.

I do not at all agree that macs are easy to repair. Apple doesn't really board-level repairs. They replace any time there is an issue. Apple charges a huge premium on out of warranty replacements and makes it hard for private repairers to fix things even if all it is is a bad capacitor. Applecare is a good extended warranty program but a lot of macbooks have design flaws that tend to crop up eventually, though Macs do often last longer than low-end Windows PCs. A windows PC with the same price point as a macbook is often a better machine.

If you were not on a budget I'd recommend a high end surface instead of a Macbook.

That being said I'm still using the macbook I had in law school having graduated in 2013, but the machine is definitely showing its age and I bought a desktop PC later for gaming.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a thinkpad x1 carbon and love it, but both Mac and PC have their merits. It honestly shouldn’t make a difference and is just a matter of personal preference. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/29/2019 at 3:33 PM, AnonLaw said:

1. The exam software was slightly better on Macs as of 2013.

2. A windows PC with the same price point as a macbook is often a better machine.

3. That being said I'm still using the macbook I had in law school having graduated in 2013, but the machine is definitely showing its age and I bought a desktop PC later for gaming.

1. Yes I think that was true for my classes in 2014 through 2017; it was always the PC students who had to ask for help;

2. I can't even imagine a $1700 windows laptop... that thing I could do some serious gaming on!!

3. My wife was still using a very old handmedown mac long after I blew through a desktop and 2 laptops! But yeah, wouldn't want to have to play EVE on that thing!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/21/2019 at 10:34 AM, SufficientCondition said:

I've been considering a move to PC from my 8-year-old MacBook as I figured the Windows platform will be universal in both classroom and professional settings. The last thing I want to deal with during 1L is to accommodate an Apple OS. 

Given not all keyboards are created equal, is it worth (in your opinions) specifically targeting a laptop with a high quality keyboard and typing experience (for exams..)?    

I just brought a keyboard to exams. I hate all laptop keyboards and only tolerate typing on them for notes because I'm not lugging around a damn keyboard everywhere.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite a few people in my class brought their gaming laptop to class/exams. Those are big chunky machines with flashing lights. Any computer will do as long as it runs window/mac with access to internet and not super uncomfortable to use.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   1 member



  • Recent Posts

    • I am only a 2017 call already have a few classmates from my year of call doing this. They seem to be doing as well, or better, financially than many of us employed as associates at law firms (full service Bay Street firms aside). But they generally seem a lot happier than those of us working as associates. Perhaps it flows from being their own boss. Or maybe it is all smoke and mirrors, and they are actually financially strapped and full of anxiety. I would imagine part of it is self-selection too, in that those who start their own firms early are more likely to be those that would not be able to tolerate working under a more senior lawyer (or lawyers) as an associate. Who knows. Hopefully some recent calls that have taken the plunge chime in and share their experiences. The conventional wisdom is that starting your own firm with only a few years of experience is too risky. But my anecdotal observations seem to betray that line of thinking.
    • Both your examples don’t engage access to justice issues. You’re literally saying that certificate clients have too many competent criminal lawyers to go to and that PI clients are able to get access to justice because of the contingency structure PI lawyers use. 
    • Satisfaction is a temporary state. First we are challenged. Then we rise to that challenge. If we succeed, then we are satisfied. Our new found success eventually becomes our baseline. We then want more, we become unsatisfied, and the cycle repeats. Billionaires are not satisfied. Celebrities destroy their lives with drugs. Many top partners suffer from depression/health complications due to overworking themselves. Imagine if you were, in this moment and for the rest of your life, completely satisfied. Would you ever change, grow, advance? I'd guess this cycle of satisfaction is just human nature, and it keeps us productive and doing things. Buddhism attempts to remove a person from attachments, and presumably enlightenment results in a satisfied state. The things you do don't satisfy you, its the way you think about them. If you really reflected on yourself, most people would realize they probably don't really care about making $300k+, being the best in their field, or having a prestigious job. Most people could probably live a lifestyle they were happy with making $30k if they had all the things they actually want out of life. The other thing about this is that the true answers are scary. What if in your reflections, you learn that law isn't for you, you are wasting your life doing it, and you need to be in a far less lucrative career? Or far more risky career? Would you radically alter your life to be where you think you should be? Probably not. After all, most people don't like their job. On your death bed, will you look back and smile on the year you worked 2,500 hours? Will you be enriched by the vacation your kids are taking to Cabo using your money instead of Cuba? Will you remember how many years it took to pay off that student loan? Will anyone remember your name after the publisher renames your textbook after the new editors? Does your spouse want to hear that one war story from the firm you have told a thousand times that isn't really that interesting to anyone outside your specialty?  It isn't about your career. Its about what your career allows you to do.
    • But what I’m saying is that a many law students (I would argue most law students) are just going to get the same grades regardless of their effort level (within reason). If I was a B student who would get a B while gunning it and would get a B while slacking, I’d slack. 
    • SCC and ONCA are post Christmas (well into January). I think AB was the only court which had applications due before Christmas, and they required applicants to send their fall grades when they became available. 
×
×
  • Create New...