Jump to content
Euroguy18

The most lucrative legal practices outside of BigLaw?

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, artsydork said:

Family clients tend to not want to pay unless they're getting exactly what they want. It gets difficult to have someone top up a retainer when they're suddenly paying $900 a month in child support or are forced to allow the other parent access when they "feel" that the child is not ready. 

Lawyers are business people. You're not getting rich as an associate. After that, it's all numbers. Whether you run a high volume legal aid practice, high volume real estate transactions, or focus on pure cash clients, you need to establish yourself and get clients. Thats true for any area.

 

Thanks for this :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/3/2019 at 1:50 PM, Diplock said:

 If, however, you are basically asking "assume I simply practice law, and I'm not especially good at it or accomplished at what I do - what area of law will I make the most money?"

That's easy, run a personal injury settlement mill. You can make millions/annum as long as you can sign up massive amounts of clients.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure I agree with picking OP apart for asking this question - why isn't it fair?

I think it's relatively common knowledge that finance jobs in business make more than HR or marketing jobs on aggregate. That's just one example, and I can foresee someone jumping in saying something along the lines of "that's not necessarily true!!!!" The same can be said for @Diplock's analogy of baseball positions. In hockey, for example, centermen get paid a premium for their services, and players who score goals (as opposed to offering other positives for the team such as assists) are also paid a premium. In baseball I'm sure the same question could be answered based on which position is most valuable or sought after defensively (for example, I think 2nd base and left field tend to be positions that are easier to fill). 

Your average run of the mill management consultant will also likely make more than your average accountant as well. I think this is a question that has so many variables attached, which have been pointed out, but it's also a question that can be answered at a high-level. Happy some were able to provide insights rather than criticize. 

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, IrishStew said:

I'm not sure I agree with picking OP apart for asking this question - why isn't it fair?

I think it's relatively common knowledge that finance jobs in business make more than HR or marketing jobs on aggregate. That's just one example, and I can foresee someone jumping in saying something along the lines of "that's not necessarily true!!!!" The same can be said for @Diplock's analogy of baseball positions. In hockey, for example, centermen get paid a premium for their services, and players who score goals (as opposed to offering other positives for the team such as assists) are also paid a premium. In baseball I'm sure the same question could be answered based on which position is most valuable or sought after defensively (for example, I think 2nd base and left field tend to be positions that are easier to fill). 

Your average run of the mill management consultant will also likely make more than your average accountant as well. I think this is a question that has so many variables attached, which have been pointed out, but it's also a question that can be answered at a high-level. Happy some were able to provide insights rather than criticize. 

My thoughts exactly. Thank you! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, thegiggler said:

That's easy, run a personal injury settlement mill. You can make millions/annum as long as you can sign up massive amounts of clients.

The issue for new(ish) lawyers is that because personal injury lawyers work on contingency, there is almost no incentive for a person to not go the most established firms/lawyers in the town. Top personal injury firms also tend to have crazy advertising budgets which means when a person needs a personal injury lawyer they'll probably instantly think of the personal injury firm that has been running ads on the radio every 10 minutes for their entire lives rather than some random nobody

But yes, I imagine after a person is able to establish themselves in that area of law that they can go into auto pilot rather than necessarily having to be a great lawyer 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Euroguy18 said:

My thoughts exactly. Thank you! 

I love it when the students who haven't even started law school yet manage to agree with one another that everyone else on this site doesn't know what we're talking about.

  • Like 8
  • Haha 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its almost as endearing as the lawyers who think that being an asshole on a internet forum is an interesting personality trait

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Euroguy18 said:

Perhaps this is a silly question, but what exactly do you mean by ‘cash clients’? I’ve never heard of that term before. 

Could a transactional real estate practice fit the bill for an area that attracts such clients? What practice areas tend to attract cash clients more than others? 

Cash clients are those that provide payment for their lawyer's services. Conversely, legal aid clients are those that qualify for legal aid certificates, in which case legal aid pays the lawyer directly, rather than the clients. 

In Ontario, LAO certificates cover some criminal cases and family files. Up until very recently, LAO also issued certificates for certain immigration and refugee cases, but has now limited that to a very small number of refugee matters (the preparation of the basis of claim form).

Other than pro bono work, I would consider everything that's not legal aid to be a cash client (I suppose you could distinguish contingency fee agreements, proceeds from the sale of the matrimonial home, etc., but I still think of them as a private or cash client). 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BabyRhinoRainbow said:

Its almost as endearing as the lawyers who think that being an asshole on a internet forum is an interesting personality trait

If it makes you feel better, I think many of us are assholes in person too :)

  • Like 4
  • Haha 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Euroguy18 said:

Perhaps this is a silly question, but what exactly do you mean by ‘cash clients’? I’ve never heard of that term before. 

Could a transactional real estate practice fit the bill for an area that attracts such clients? What practice areas tend to attract cash clients more than others? 

Thanks for the feedback btw. It’s greatly appreciated. 

Cash clients = clients who pay cash to their lawyers as opposed to getting legal aid.

You don’t get legal aid for real estate. It’s all cash. Family, some immigration, criminal, some administrative/civil can be cash or legal aid. Some cash clients can pay more cash than others. 

Real estate tends to be more about the volume than getting lots of cash. My understanding, not actually working in the field, is that there’s usually a flat rate for a house sale which doesn’t take a ton of hours and it is relatively rare that things blow up into more complex matters. You’ll make more money when your client can pay a high hourly rate for unlimited hours for a matter that takes a lot of hours.Some cash clients of limited means can’t do this, but can pay a flat rate. 

Edited by providence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, IrishStew said:

I'm not sure I agree with picking OP apart for asking this question - why isn't it fair?

I think it's relatively common knowledge that finance jobs in business make more than HR or marketing jobs on aggregate. That's just one example, and I can foresee someone jumping in saying something along the lines of "that's not necessarily true!!!!" The same can be said for @Diplock's analogy of baseball positions. In hockey, for example, centermen get paid a premium for their services, and players who score goals (as opposed to offering other positives for the team such as assists) are also paid a premium. In baseball I'm sure the same question could be answered based on which position is most valuable or sought after defensively (for example, I think 2nd base and left field tend to be positions that are easier to fill). 

Your average run of the mill management consultant will also likely make more than your average accountant as well. I think this is a question that has so many variables attached, which have been pointed out, but it's also a question that can be answered at a high-level. Happy some were able to provide insights rather than criticize. 

I think what the lawyers are saying is that it’s an impossible question to answer and therefore pointless to ask, but you can if you want. I don’t know enough about finance, hockey or baseball to comment on what their circumstances are, but in law, there is no one guaranteed area where people make more money than others. Making one of the very highest incomes is more based on talent and work ethic, and various other circumstances like location, and maybe a little luck, than it is on the type of law you practice. I can say that you are going to need to be a business owner/partner. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
55 minutes ago, providence said:

I think what the lawyers are saying is that it’s an impossible question to answer and therefore pointless to ask

What I'm trying to get at is there are more helpful answers than just critiquing the question that was asked. OP has recognized that it's a hard question to answer, and that not every case is the same. They're not looking for a hard and fast rule or get rich quick scheme.

As in my other example- finance jobs pay more than human resources jobs, but at the same time, a talented HR person who has a tremendous work ethic (and maybe a little luck) can make more than someone in finance.

And, to put the cherry on top, having people work for you rather than working for them is bound to make you more money in any industry if you're running a profitable business and scaling accordingly. 

A medical school student asking "which professions make the most money", is almost just as subjective, and I'm sure some doctors would have cookie-cutter answers such as "well that depends on how hard you work and how talented you are", but the principles can be applied to give helpful advice at least. I can tell you, and I'm not a doctor, that a plastic surgeon who owns their own clinic makes more money per year than a general family doctor. Surgeons make more as well, and among surgeons I'd wager that heart and neuro-surgeons make more money on aggregate than ortho. With that said I'll acknowledge your argument that a talented and hardworking ortho surgeon can make more than a heart surgeon (perhaps they're business-oriented and partner with professional sports teams on the side, who knows). 

This conversation gets cyclical real quick. Point is that there's no need to be rude and condescending to someone who is asking a genuine question with less experience than you. Sometimes it feels like a select few lawyers on this site just like to argue and flex their muscles over small details. 

Edited by IrishStew
  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, IrishStew said:

What I'm trying to get at is there are more helpful answers than just critiquing the question that was asked. OP has recognized that it's a hard question to answer, and that not every case is the same. They're not looking for a hard and fast rule or get rich quick scheme.

As in my other example- finance jobs pay more than human resources jobs, but at the same time, a talented HR person who has a tremendous work ethic (and maybe a little luck) can make more than someone in finance.

And, to put the cherry on top, having people work for you rather than working for them is bound to make you more money in any industry is you're running a profitable business and scaling accordingly. 

A medical school student asking "which professions make the most money", is almost just as subjective, and I'm sure some doctors would have cookie-cutter answers such as "well that depends on how hard you work and how talented you are", but the principles can be applied to give helpful advice at least. I can tell you, and I'm not a doctor, that a plastic surgeon who owns their own clinic makes more money per year than a general family doctor. Surgeons make more as well, and among surgeons I'd wager that heart and neuro-surgeons make more money on aggregate than ortho. With that said I'll acknowledge your argument that a talented and hardworking ortho surgeon can make more than a heart surgeon (perhaps they're business-oriented and partner with professional sports teams on the side, who knows). 

This conversation gets cyclical real quick. Point is that there's no need to be rude and condescending to someone who is asking a genuine question with less experience than you. Sometimes it feels like a select few lawyers on this site just like to argue and flex their muscles over small details. 

Couldn’t agree more with your last statement. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, IrishStew said:

What I'm trying to get at is there are more helpful answers than just critiquing the question that was asked. OP has recognized that it's a hard question to answer, and that not every case is the same. They're not looking for a hard and fast rule or get rich quick scheme.

As in my other example- finance jobs pay more than human resources jobs, but at the same time, a talented HR person who has a tremendous work ethic (and maybe a little luck) can make more than someone in finance.

And, to put the cherry on top, having people work for you rather than working for them is bound to make you more money in any industry is you're running a profitable business and scaling accordingly. 

A medical school student asking "which professions make the most money", is almost just as subjective, and I'm sure some doctors would have cookie-cutter answers such as "well that depends on how hard you work and how talented you are", but the principles can be applied to give helpful advice at least. I can tell you, and I'm not a doctor, that a plastic surgeon who owns their own clinic makes more money per year than a general family doctor. Surgeons make more as well, and among surgeons I'd wager that heart and neuro-surgeons make more money on aggregate than ortho. With that said I'll acknowledge your argument that a talented and hardworking ortho surgeon can make more than a heart surgeon (perhaps they're business-oriented and partner with professional sports teams on the side, who knows). 

This conversation gets cyclical real quick. Point is that there's no need to be rude and condescending to someone who is asking a genuine question with less experience than you. Sometimes it feels like a select few lawyers on this site just like to argue and flex their muscles over small details. 

My genuine, not intentionally rude, condescending or argumentative question, is: why does anyone need to know what is the most lucrative area of law, other than trying to figure out how rich they can get? What is the purpose of the question?

If we know what you’re really trying to ask, we can give you better answers. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of critiquing the answers and other members,  let's get the discussion back on track. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, erinl2 said:

Instead of critiquing the answers and other members,  let's get the discussion back on track. 

I concur. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is really strange to exclude "big law" practices since big firms practice areas are incredibly broad. Take tax for example, it is pretty classicly one area that all large firms have, and yet the issues that large firms face are often the same as small firms. The only difference tends to be dollar amounts mean that you can actually dispute things. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, providence said:

My genuine, not intentionally rude, condescending or argumentative question, is: why does anyone need to know what is the most lucrative area of law, other than trying to figure out how rich they can get? What is the purpose of the question?

If we know what you’re really trying to ask, we can give you better answers. 

Presumably so they can target that area of law for a career? That seems pretty straightforward to me from the question.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, providence said:

My genuine, not intentionally rude, condescending or argumentative question, is: why does anyone need to know what is the most lucrative area of law, other than trying to figure out how rich they can get? What is the purpose of the question?

If we know what you’re really trying to ask, we can give you better answers. 

What other purpose could there really be, I wonder.. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • So you’re saying you didn’t work your ass off to get into university, maintain a high GPA, pass the LSAT, get into law school, maintain good grades in law school, kill articling interviews, work yourself to the grindstone during articling, pass the bar, and now you’re where you are? this whole “white privilege” discussion is total bullshit and nonsense. I don’t understand the guilt people have for being successful. And you shouldn’t be guilty for your parents having worked that hard to provide a good life for you as I’m sure you will for your kids. 
    • Maybe in some positions, but definitely not in others, including mine.  Unless I have court, I schedule whatever I want and do whatever I please. As long as the hours are there, no one cares. 
    • Work. I love having a schedule that I cannot miss for any reason and getting paid to adhere to it and work on practical, real-life matters. I love having that sense of direction too, as well as just knowing that no matter how small the task I'm working on is, it is still meaningful. I learn a lot more too and retain it far better. I want to wake up in the morning and get started on my day, whereas when I'm in school I constantly yearn for the weekend. I feel a lot more anxiety in school... I get a bit of anxiety at work too, but I think the stability and meaningfulness make it a lot easier to deal with. Getting paid and not having to worry about how I am going to pay the bills is also an added bonus, but I would probably prefer school if it was structurally more similar to a work environment and things were taught in a more hands-on, practical matter.
    • We did actually get an email from the Parkdale intensive back in March, i.e. after the clinic recruit, informing students that they still had unfilled spots so I actually got the sense that it wasn't a very popular clinic, for whatever reason. 
    • It's a realistic statement. It may seem harsh to those waiting but it would be disingenuous, and dishonest, to instead tell someone the opposite. Most people who are waitlisted, at any school, do not end up receiving an acceptance. It's also a statement that was likely referencing those who have made provisional acceptances at another school and who shouldn't dismiss those in hopes of getting in off a waitlist. 
×
×
  • Create New...