Jump to content
TahiaDZ

U Ottawa vs. Windsor Dual JD

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

So, I have already provisionally accepted my offer at U Ottawa for the English JD program, but recently got accepted to the dual JD at Windsor...

I've read a variety of posts stating that most people have the "Dual JD is a last option for those who can't get in elsewhere" mindset, but couldn't find any factual information as to why that is. Is it not nice to have the option to practice in both the US and Canada? Or do the opportunities after graduation for the Dual degree not make up for the cost difference?  

I currently live in Canada, and would most likely practice here after my degree, but in the future wouldn't pass an opportunity to move to the US. Any advice/perspectives are appreciated! :) 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any Canadian common law JD will give you the ability to write the bar in NY and MA. The dual JD at Windsor is extremely expensive and the U.S. part of the dual ranks in the lowest tier.  Ottawa is a better choice.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/18/2019 at 10:06 AM, erinl2 said:

Any Canadian common law JD will give you the ability to write the bar in NY and MA. The dual JD at Windsor is extremely expensive and the U.S. part of the dual ranks in the lowest tier.  Ottawa is a better choice.

How hard is it for a Canadian JD to pass the NY or MA bar?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Iyaiaey said:

How hard is it for a Canadian JD to pass the NY or MA bar?

Your Detroit mercy degree won't help you pass the bar more than a single Canadian JD will. Not significantly anyway. And certainly not enough to make the debt worth it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, pzabbythesecond said:

Your Detroit mercy degree won't help you pass the bar more than a single Canadian JD will. Not significantly anyway. And certainly not enough to make the debt worth it.

I'm not sure why you are mentioning Detroit mercy, I was speaking generally. Is it substantially more difficult for a Canadian JD to pass the bar than an American?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Iyaiaey said:

I'm not sure why you are mentioning Detroit mercy, I was speaking generally. Is it substantially more difficult for a Canadian JD to pass the bar than an American?

This is a thread about the Windsor dual program with Detroit mercy, which is why I said what I said.

Generally, going to a local school to the area you want to practice is best. Finances change that equation such that going through the growing curves of writing a NY bar with a Canadian JD is worth not going into 120k more debt at a not so great American school (even the good ones are often not worth the debt in this scenario).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Recently, Detroit Mercy has done very well, significantly above the average, re: its graduates passing the Michigan bar, because they have thrown significant resources at raising the bar passage rate. The pass rate is still only 67%. You’d have to see how much the NY bar varies from the MI bar to know if Detroit Mercy is likely to help. The overall first-time pass rate for the NY bar is around 60% - it varies a bit from year to year. I can’t see that they track how Canadians do to know if they do significantly better or worse than that. 

A lot of people take bar prep courses for the US bar exam - I am not sure whether a US law degree does much to help or if you could just get a Canadian degree and then take the Barbri course and study on your own. 

Edited by providence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Put it this way (and other more senior members feel free to correct me if I'm wrong):

Law school is mostly agreed to be the place that teaches you how to learn the law. It teaches you a 30 thousand foot view of the law, but in terms of substantively learning the law it doesn't do much. This differs school to school but generally holds true.

The Bar examines you on the law more substantively. That's why you almost certainly have to study for any bar exam- be it Ontario, BC, Quebec, Nova Scotia, NY, MI, or Cali.

Given what schools do, the marginal help you get by going to the school in that region may very well not be worth the significant added debt that an American law school puts you in.

Edited by pzabbythesecond
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/17/2019 at 11:59 PM, TahiaDZ said:

Hey all,

So, I have already provisionally accepted my offer at U Ottawa for the English JD program, but recently got accepted to the dual JD at Windsor...

I've read a variety of posts stating that most people have the "Dual JD is a last option for those who can't get in elsewhere" mindset, but couldn't find any factual information as to why that is. Is it not nice to have the option to practice in both the US and Canada? Or do the opportunities after graduation for the Dual degree not make up for the cost difference?  

I currently live in Canada, and would most likely practice here after my degree, but in the future wouldn't pass an opportunity to move to the US. Any advice/perspectives are appreciated! :) 

The reason why the dual JD is looked down on is that it has very low entrance stats that are uncompetitive at other schools and it is seen as a cash grab by the school for low performing students desperate to go to law school. The US school the program partners with us very poorly ranked. Also the program oversells the benefit of having a US law degree and the career opportunities it supposedly offers. As pointed out, you do not need to take the dual JD to be able to practice in the US, and the cost is not worth any supposed benefits. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, mazzystar said:

Detroit Mercy is ridiculously expensive for such a low-ranked school though. You can apply for a Canadian-US dual degree here after first year and get a dual degree with Washington College of Law in DC/Michigan State which are good T2/3s : https://commonlaw.uottawa.ca/en/students/programs/combined-programs/canadian-american-dual-jd-program

Both of those are pretty poorly ranked as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You just completed your articles in insurance defense and yet claim to have vast knowledge in the field of medical and health law. You've also got an  LLM that focused on 11 different topics unrelated to insurance or civil lit.  But the type of law you are really interested in is IP law.   And you intend to tell employers about your poly marriage?  During interviews I assume?  Only way it could be a red flag is if you told someone unless your last name is Blackmore.  
    • The reason many 1Ls get crushed after grades come out is because they mistakenly carried the "hard work means good grades" mentality into law school. The bolded part of your post is me pointing out that you're making the same mistake. What I think you really need to do is change how you prepare for exams. My advice to you FOLLOW AT YOUR OWN RISK I'm a fellow slow worker. When I prepared for midterms like everyone else, I got the same marks as everyone else. When I prepared for final exams like a slow worker, I beat the curve in 6/7 courses. The only course where I didn't beat the curve was also the only class I made the mistake of not doing the aforementioned. Understand that you can't do all of the assigned work. It may take other people 1 hour to do a 30 page reading while it takes you 4 hours (I personally need to read every word on the page). Doing all of the assigned work is just not feasible for you because its not an efficient use of time. There is absolutely no shame in admitting this or accepting this. Doing all of the assigned work is just one of many different ways to prepare for the exam. You should let my exam grade determine whether your unique method of preparation is right or wrong. Understand that doing all of the assigned work doesn't mean you shouldn't be doing any work or even less work, it just means you should be doing the work that helps you best prepare for the exam. Doing the readings - Your main focus should be to make the most efficient use of your time (i.e. doing the type of work that helps you, as an individual, best prepare for the exam) First, check the syllabus to understand the place of this reading in the class (you'd be surprised how many people overlook the value of the course syllabus). The question here is: what am I reading? What topic is this reading on? How many days will you be dealing with this topic? How many pages is it? Is the topic a standalone topic or one piece of a bigger topic? This will give you a rough idea of how much time and concern you should give to this topic and also generally primes you for the work you need to do. Second, very briefly skim the reading while paying attention to the structure of the reading. Read the headings, intros, conclusions, etc. This will help you understand the skeleton of the reading.  Third, once you understand what you're reading (i.e. after completing the first two steps) your next question is: why am I reading this? Why has the professor assigned this reading? In other words, what does your professor want you, as a student, to get out of this reading for the purposes of their class? To answer these questions, look to course summaries/CANs from upper years who have taken the same course with the same professor.  Fourth, now you know what you're reading and why you're reading it. The question now here is: what does this reading say about that? If you're a person who's comfortable relying on a summary/CAN, then rely on your summaries/CANs to provide answer the answer to this question. If you're a person who's more comfortable doing the reading, then let the summaries/CANs create the signposts of what's important in the reading so you can focus on that and allocate your time effectively.  For example, if you're dealing with the topic of sexual assault in 1L criminal law, then you're probably going to want to read all of Ewanchuk and only focus on the bare essentials in every other case (e.g. R v Chase - only matters because it tells us how to interpret the sexual nature element of the AR; R v Cuerrier - only matters because it tells us when fraud vitiates consent and what L'Heureux Dube and McLachlin say in their respective dissents, respectfully, doesn't matter for the strict purpose of your exam unless your professor cares about policy; R v Mabior - only matters because it tells us when non-disclosure of HIV status vitiates consent/constitutes fraud; R v JA - only matters because it tells us to how interpret consent and, respectfully, Fish's dissent doesn't matter unless your professor cares about policy; etc)  Lectures - The purpose of lectures isn't for the professor to spoon-feed you the material, for you to practice your skills as a typist and copy the lecture verbatim or for you to get your online Christmas shopping done. The purpose of the lecture is for the professor to: Confirm to you that you're on the right track (i.e. you've done the aforementioned Reading stage correctly and understand what the topic is, why you're doing the reading, and that you know what you need to know) Clarify anything in the readings and/or correct any mistakes/things missing from your understanding/notes or the summaries/CANs you've relied on Provide you with their unique perspective/opinion/approach to the topic at hand. You're going to keep this in mind when writing your exam in order to cater to their beliefs, prejudices. For example, if you have a feminist professor, don't argue that sex work should be criminalized on an exam. Present both sides to the argument, and in one sentence say that you support it even if you don't. As a future lawyer, you're going to be arguing a lot of things you don't agree with or believe in for your own personal gain. Might as well start early   Give you any hints about the exam. Professors notice if/when the herd thins out during the school year and some times will be inclined to reward students for attending. There have been multiple times that I've gotten useful hints about exams from a professor simply for being present during a boring lecture in the middle of October Exams - Exam-writing is a skill. Learn it. Read books on how to develop the skill. My recommendation is "Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades" by Alex Schimel. Create your own outline. In your 5 to 15 page outline, you should have every piece of the "what you need to know" part of each of your readings. There should be absolutely no superfluous bullshit, fluff or fat on your outline. You've literally condensed the entire course into those 5 to 15 pages. Your casebook, other peoples outlines/CANs, etc were all just tools for you to arrive at your own outline.  Learn your outline cold. I mean cold. This doesn't only mean just memorizing it. You should be able to open up ExamSoft and type out the blackletter law part of your future exam answer on demand and at near-lightning speed. The only class that I actually did this properly for was the one I finished at the top (and despite missing a major issue on the exam) and the other class that I did this, but sort of half-assed, I got an A- despite writing one paragraph for a question worth 33% question because I blanked out. Once you've learned the outline cold, take a few old exam questions and do timed exams on ExamSoft. Your focus is to type out the blackletter law as you've been doing and then actually apply it to the facts. Review your answer by yourself, then with a professor (if you can reach them/they'll allow this) and finally compare against old exam answers. Many people will disagree with this but once you do a few of these timed exams, you'll start to notice repeating patterns in terms of the issues tested, answer structures, etc (there can only be so many and also many professors are creatures of habit). 
    • Had a similar thing happen: What can you tell me about person X? Should I know person X? They mentioned you in their interview... I have no idea who this person is...
×
×
  • Create New...