Jump to content

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, SpaceLawyer said:

No I haven't, this has to be the shittiest experience I have ever had and I really don't mean to bitch but I literally had both my parents die in my undergrad and I kept a 3.7 CGPA, I did all the extracurricular, got academically recognized, completed a masters and have a 155 LSAT. I frankly don't know what the hell else I can do. 

If that had happened in my life, I have no idea where I’d be, but I can tell you I’d have nowhere near a 3.7 and close to a law school acceptance like you are. This feels like crap and I can empathize to an extent (I have gone through my own share of rough). But be proud of yourself for coming out of it on the other side the way you have.

If you *want* to and have the ability, apply again because I think you will get in. If not, remember that a JD isn’t everything; you know that better than anyone, having faced the adversity you’ve overcome. Best of luck with whatever choice you make. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, MB350 said:

If that had happened in my life, I have no idea where I’d be, but I can tell you I’d have nowhere near a 3.7 and close to a law school acceptance like you are. This feels like crap and I can empathize to an extent (I have gone through my own share of rough). But be proud of yourself for coming out of it on the other side the way you have.

If you *want* to and have the ability, apply again because I think you will get in. If not, remember that a JD isn’t everything; you know that better than anyone, having faced the adversity you’ve overcome. Best of luck with whatever choice you make. 

Honestly, not to be rude but it doesn't matter, a JD isn't everything to a lot of people but it is to me, I didn't care where I got in, I just wanted to practice law.

Be proud of what? I didn't let their deaths define me, it didn't mean anything, I overcame it all and what did it do for me? nothing, I just had the stats that would be necessary for getting into law school and evidently that has done dick all for me. It's been such a slap in the face, I got waitlisted at Ottawa U last year with a lower LSAT and no MA to only be rejected this year with a better one and a masters degree. 

I will be applying again, because frankly, what other choice do I have? it just royally screws everything up because of how old i'll be, the thousand dollars i'll have to respend on applications and the LSAT because evidently 155 wasn't high enough and by the time I start actually practicing I will have absolutely zero time before I have to start making the huge life decisions about families with absolutely zero financing to back it up. 

There's a few U.S law schools still accepting applications and I may try for the UK even though those deadlines passed. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, MB350 said:

If that had happened in my life, I have no idea where I’d be, but I can tell you I’d have nowhere near a 3.7 and close to a law school acceptance like you are. This feels like crap and I can empathize to an extent (I have gone through my own share of rough). But be proud of yourself for coming out of it on the other side the way you have.

If you *want* to and have the ability, apply again because I think you will get in. If not, remember that a JD isn’t everything; you know that better than anyone, having faced the adversity you’ve overcome. Best of luck with whatever choice you make. 

And trust me, I don't say that lightly, I turned down a double digit PhD scholarship because I believed I was getting in, and I just love law way more. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rejected via email earlier today. Was on the waitlist and applied under special circumstances,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, marsplastic said:

Rejected via email earlier today. Was on the waitlist and applied under special circumstances,

If you don't mind sharing, what are your stats? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, SpaceLawyer said:

Honestly, not to be rude but it doesn't matter, a JD isn't everything to a lot of people but it is to me, I didn't care where I got in, I just wanted to practice law.

Be proud of what? I didn't let their deaths define me, it didn't mean anything, I overcame it all and what did it do for me? nothing, I just had the stats that would be necessary for getting into law school and evidently that has done dick all for me. It's been such a slap in the face, I got waitlisted at Ottawa U last year with a lower LSAT and no MA to only be rejected this year with a better one and a masters degree. 

I will be applying again, because frankly, what other choice do I have? it just royally screws everything up because of how old i'll be, the thousand dollars i'll have to respend on applications and the LSAT because evidently 155 wasn't high enough and by the time I start actually practicing I will have absolutely zero time before I have to start making the huge life decisions about families with absolutely zero financing to back it up. 

There's a few U.S law schools still accepting applications and I may try for the UK even though those deadlines passed. 

I think right now hearing don't worry, or its going to be okay isn't helpful to you. take a night off blow off some steam and then figure out what comes next. I'm sorry this happened to you. chin up because you literally have no other choice it's either pick up the pieces or be miserable. Honestly it seems like you've worked to damn hard for it to be the latter. good luck i'm sending out positive vibes into the universe for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, SpaceLawyer said:

Honestly, not to be rude but it doesn't matter, a JD isn't everything to a lot of people but it is to me, I didn't care where I got in, I just wanted to practice law.

Be proud of what? I didn't let their deaths define me, it didn't mean anything, I overcame it all and what did it do for me? nothing, I just had the stats that would be necessary for getting into law school and evidently that has done dick all for me. It's been such a slap in the face, I got waitlisted at Ottawa U last year with a lower LSAT and no MA to only be rejected this year with a better one and a masters degree. 

I will be applying again, because frankly, what other choice do I have? it just royally screws everything up because of how old i'll be, the thousand dollars i'll have to respend on applications and the LSAT because evidently 155 wasn't high enough and by the time I start actually practicing I will have absolutely zero time before I have to start making the huge life decisions about families with absolutely zero financing to back it up. 

There's a few U.S law schools still accepting applications and I may try for the UK even though those deadlines passed. 

Hey, I just wanted to reach out and mention I've been through similar things as you and I feel just the same, extremely disappointed and exhausted. Although I didn't lose two parents, I lost my father in my third year of undergrad finals. Wrote a lot about what events (relevant to this and other) I overcame in my personal statement for TRU and clearly that wasn't enough. I don't even know how holistic TRU really is anymore. Your GPA and LSAT are both higher than mine so I commend you there and you should have definitely been accepted. I've been active on these forums for a long time and I have noted many applicants who have received offers with lower stats than yours. I'm also looking into any other options available as I only see law as my goal as well. I've found a few US and UK options still open this late into the cycle, personal message me if you want to discuss them as I am still deciding as well. With your stats however, applying to Canadian schools would be a better option. 

For everyone else, I too have received an email today letting me know my name has been taken off wait list. This was my second time applying to TRU so I doubt I will apply again to this school. Good luck to everyone who remains on the list! Still waiting on one more Canadian school to get back to me otherwise i'll either be re-writing the LSAT and waiting another year or going abroad. If anyone has any advice on what to do from here please feel free to message me.

152 LSAT, 3.4 cgpa, around 3.7/3.8 L2 

Lots of work and volunteer experience in 3 different law firms. 

References from a professor I had during undergrad and a lawyer that's known me for over 6 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got rejected today and knocked off the waitlist. I can definitely relate to the frustration and anxiety I see on this waitlist. I’ve been rejected two cycles so it’s disheartening. But some of the best and greatest people are made by going through the worst of struggles. So I hope that we don’t lose that light and know that you are extremely talented (my stats weren’t even as comparable) and that it’ll work out when it’s meant to 😊

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so sorry about all of this guys. I have been rejected as well (was expecting it) but Leanne said this year it was extremely competitive - the most it has ever been! She told me with my stats, I would surprisingly would have got in last year. 

This year over 3200 people applied - so people feel great that you were on a waitlist. I have a great L2 but my LSAT's were horrible and she said in order to be considered I need a 155+. It is starting to get more competitive so just put in the work for the LSAT. 

For someone who has had better experiences with the LSAT - I am not giving up, if you trouble with anxiety - apply for accommodations which I what I have done. 

They are changing the policy for rewrites - so take advantage of that and rewrite before it is restricted. WORK HARD TO INCREASE YOUR LSAT!!!

21 minutes ago, 604wannabelawyer said:

Got rejected today and knocked off the waitlist. I can definitely relate to the frustration and anxiety I see on this waitlist. I’ve been rejected two cycles so it’s disheartening. But some of the best and greatest people are made by going through the worst of struggles. So I hope that we don’t lose that light and know that you are extremely talented (my stats weren’t even as comparable) and that it’ll work out when it’s meant to 😊

 

1 hour ago, AKJ said:

Hey, I just wanted to reach out and mention I've been through similar things as you and I feel just the same, extremely disappointed and exhausted. Although I didn't lose two parents, I lost my father in my third year of undergrad finals. Wrote a lot about what events (relevant to this and other) I overcame in my personal statement for TRU and clearly that wasn't enough. I don't even know how holistic TRU really is anymore. Your GPA and LSAT are both higher than mine so I commend you there and you should have definitely been accepted. I've been active on these forums for a long time and I have noted many applicants who have received offers with lower stats than yours. I'm also looking into any other options available as I only see law as my goal as well. I've found a few US and UK options still open this late into the cycle, personal message me if you want to discuss them as I am still deciding as well. With your stats however, applying to Canadian schools would be a better option. 

For everyone else, I too have received an email today letting me know my name has been taken off wait list. This was my second time applying to TRU so I doubt I will apply again to this school. Good luck to everyone who remains on the list! Still waiting on one more Canadian school to get back to me otherwise i'll either be re-writing the LSAT and waiting another year or going abroad. If anyone has any advice on what to do from here please feel free to message me.

152 LSAT, 3.4 cgpa, around 3.7/3.8 L2 

Lots of work and volunteer experience in 3 different law firms. 

References from a professor I had during undergrad and a lawyer that's known me for over 6 years.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SpaceLawyer said:

I didn't apply anywhere in the prairies because my academic interests were at other schools

Get your LSAT to 160 you will get into UVic next cycle.

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, AKJ said:

Hey, I just wanted to reach out and mention I've been through similar things as you and I feel just the same, extremely disappointed and exhausted. Although I didn't lose two parents, I lost my father in my third year of undergrad finals. Wrote a lot about what events (relevant to this and other) I overcame in my personal statement for TRU and clearly that wasn't enough. I don't even know how holistic TRU really is anymore. Your GPA and LSAT are both higher than mine so I commend you there and you should have definitely been accepted. I've been active on these forums for a long time and I have noted many applicants who have received offers with lower stats than yours. I'm also looking into any other options available as I only see law as my goal as well. I've found a few US and UK options still open this late into the cycle, personal message me if you want to discuss them as I am still deciding as well. With your stats however, applying to Canadian schools would be a better option. 

For everyone else, I too have received an email today letting me know my name has been taken off wait list. This was my second time applying to TRU so I doubt I will apply again to this school. Good luck to everyone who remains on the list! Still waiting on one more Canadian school to get back to me otherwise i'll either be re-writing the LSAT and waiting another year or going abroad. If anyone has any advice on what to do from here please feel free to message me.

152 LSAT, 3.4 cgpa, around 3.7/3.8 L2 

Lots of work and volunteer experience in 3 different law firms. 

References from a professor I had during undergrad and a lawyer that's known me for over 6 years.

Msg sent! Thank you for this, I was extremely frustrated yesterday and just took the time to be away from all the law school stuff. I'm sorry to hear about your father, i know what it's like to have to overcome something like that and it isn't easy. It's the age for me right now, their deaths put me way behind and every year i'm out is another year off my career and the time i have to advance it before I have to think about having a family. I'm not someone who particularly wants to have kids at 40. I'm definitely going abroad at this point, after being waitlisted at Ottawa U last year with worse stats to being rejected this year with better ones, it's starting to feel like a crap shoot and I really don't have the time for that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, NeverGiveUp said:

Get your LSAT to 160 you will get into UVic next cycle.

Good luck!

Not to be that guy, but unless you're part of the adcom, please stop saying you'll get into this school or that school, you really don't know and while I appreciate you're trying to be supportive, it doesn't do anything for me. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, IWantJD said:

I think right now hearing don't worry, or its going to be okay isn't helpful to you. take a night off blow off some steam and then figure out what comes next. I'm sorry this happened to you. chin up because you literally have no other choice it's either pick up the pieces or be miserable. Honestly it seems like you've worked to damn hard for it to be the latter. good luck i'm sending out positive vibes into the universe for you.

Cheers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SpaceLawyer said:

Not to be that guy, but unless you're part of the adcom, please stop saying you'll get into this school or that school, you really don't know and while I appreciate you're trying to be supportive, it doesn't do anything for me. 

UofA and UVic's admissions are index based - it is easy to calculate their indexes.

Anyway got you.

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NeverGiveUp said:

UofA and UVic's admissions are index based - it is easy to calculate their indexes.

Anyway got you.

Good luck!

I apologize for sounding snappy. I'm just extremely frustrated. I appreciate you providing the info.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, SpaceLawyer said:

I apologize for sounding snappy. I'm just extremely frustrated. I appreciate you providing the info.

No worries - I feel your pain.

UofA index:

L2 GPA out of 4.0 * 22.5 + LSAT (Average) >= 242 -- auto admit (most likely)

UVic index:

CGPA with drops (in 4.33 scale) * 125 +  highest LSAT percentile * 5 >= 905 -- auto admit (most likely).

If your index is above 880 you will have a chance to get in through the wait-list.

https://www.uvic.ca/law/assets/docs/admissfinaid/LSAT-GPA Demographic Chart.pdf

Here is the info regarding the drops:

https://lawstudents.ca/forums/topic/52391-drops-with-more-than-120-credits/

One thing I don't understand:

You are going to a foreign law school but don't want to go to UofA?

 

Edited by NeverGiveUp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, NeverGiveUp said:

No worries - I feel your pain.

UofA index:

L2 GPA out of 4.0 * 22.5 + LSAT (Average) >= 242 -- auto admit (most likely)

UVic index:

CGPA with drops (in 4.33 scale) * 125 +  highest LSAT percentile * 5 >= 905 -- auto admit (most likely).

If your index is above 880 you will have a chance to get in through the wait-list.

https://www.uvic.ca/law/assets/docs/admissfinaid/LSAT-GPA Demographic Chart.pdf

Here is the info regarding the drops:

https://lawstudents.ca/forums/topic/52391-drops-with-more-than-120-credits/

One thing I don't understand:

You are going to a foreign law school but don't want to go to UofA?

 

Because U of A doesn't really offer any room for independent academic study, all the law schools I applied to in Canada either had a self research option or the specialization I wanted.  

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You just completed your articles in insurance defense and yet claim to have vast knowledge in the field of medical and health law. You've also got an  LLM that focused on 11 different topics unrelated to insurance or civil lit.  But the type of law you are really interested in is IP law.   And you intend to tell employers about your poly marriage?  During interviews I assume?  Only way it could be a red flag is if you told someone unless your last name is Blackmore.  
    • The reason many 1Ls get crushed after grades come out is because they mistakenly carried the "hard work means good grades" mentality into law school. The bolded part of your post is me pointing out that you're making the same mistake. What I think you really need to do is change how you prepare for exams. My advice to you FOLLOW AT YOUR OWN RISK I'm a fellow slow worker. When I prepared for midterms like everyone else, I got the same marks as everyone else. When I prepared for final exams like a slow worker, I beat the curve in 6/7 courses. The only course where I didn't beat the curve was also the only class I made the mistake of not doing the aforementioned. Understand that you can't do all of the assigned work. It may take other people 1 hour to do a 30 page reading while it takes you 4 hours (I personally need to read every word on the page). Doing all of the assigned work is just not feasible for you because its not an efficient use of time. There is absolutely no shame in admitting this or accepting this. Doing all of the assigned work is just one of many different ways to prepare for the exam. You should let my exam grade determine whether your unique method of preparation is right or wrong. Understand that doing all of the assigned work doesn't mean you shouldn't be doing any work or even less work, it just means you should be doing the work that helps you best prepare for the exam. Doing the readings - Your main focus should be to make the most efficient use of your time (i.e. doing the type of work that helps you, as an individual, best prepare for the exam) First, check the syllabus to understand the place of this reading in the class (you'd be surprised how many people overlook the value of the course syllabus). The question here is: what am I reading? What topic is this reading on? How many days will you be dealing with this topic? How many pages is it? Is the topic a standalone topic or one piece of a bigger topic? This will give you a rough idea of how much time and concern you should give to this topic and also generally primes you for the work you need to do. Second, very briefly skim the reading while paying attention to the structure of the reading. Read the headings, intros, conclusions, etc. This will help you understand the skeleton of the reading.  Third, once you understand what you're reading (i.e. after completing the first two steps) your next question is: why am I reading this? Why has the professor assigned this reading? In other words, what does your professor want you, as a student, to get out of this reading for the purposes of their class? To answer these questions, look to course summaries/CANs from upper years who have taken the same course with the same professor.  Fourth, now you know what you're reading and why you're reading it. The question now here is: what does this reading say about that? If you're a person who's comfortable relying on a summary/CAN, then rely on your summaries/CANs to provide answer the answer to this question. If you're a person who's more comfortable doing the reading, then let the summaries/CANs create the signposts of what's important in the reading so you can focus on that and allocate your time effectively.  For example, if you're dealing with the topic of sexual assault in 1L criminal law, then you're probably going to want to read all of Ewanchuk and only focus on the bare essentials in every other case (e.g. R v Chase - only matters because it tells us how to interpret the sexual nature element of the AR; R v Cuerrier - only matters because it tells us when fraud vitiates consent and what L'Heureux Dube and McLachlin say in their respective dissents, respectfully, doesn't matter for the strict purpose of your exam unless your professor cares about policy; R v Mabior - only matters because it tells us when non-disclosure of HIV status vitiates consent/constitutes fraud; R v JA - only matters because it tells us to how interpret consent and, respectfully, Fish's dissent doesn't matter unless your professor cares about policy; etc)  Lectures - The purpose of lectures isn't for the professor to spoon-feed you the material, for you to practice your skills as a typist and copy the lecture verbatim or for you to get your online Christmas shopping done. The purpose of the lecture is for the professor to: Confirm to you that you're on the right track (i.e. you've done the aforementioned Reading stage correctly and understand what the topic is, why you're doing the reading, and that you know what you need to know) Clarify anything in the readings and/or correct any mistakes/things missing from your understanding/notes or the summaries/CANs you've relied on Provide you with their unique perspective/opinion/approach to the topic at hand. You're going to keep this in mind when writing your exam in order to cater to their beliefs, prejudices. For example, if you have a feminist professor, don't argue that sex work should be criminalized on an exam. Present both sides to the argument, and in one sentence say that you support it even if you don't. As a future lawyer, you're going to be arguing a lot of things you don't agree with or believe in for your own personal gain. Might as well start early   Give you any hints about the exam. Professors notice if/when the herd thins out during the school year and some times will be inclined to reward students for attending. There have been multiple times that I've gotten useful hints about exams from a professor simply for being present during a boring lecture in the middle of October Exams - Exam-writing is a skill. Learn it. Read books on how to develop the skill. My recommendation is "Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades" by Alex Schimel. Create your own outline. In your 5 to 15 page outline, you should have every piece of the "what you need to know" part of each of your readings. There should be absolutely no superfluous bullshit, fluff or fat on your outline. You've literally condensed the entire course into those 5 to 15 pages. Your casebook, other peoples outlines/CANs, etc were all just tools for you to arrive at your own outline.  Learn your outline cold. I mean cold. This doesn't only mean just memorizing it. You should be able to open up ExamSoft and type out the blackletter law part of your future exam answer on demand and at near-lightning speed. The only class that I actually did this properly for was the one I finished at the top (and despite missing a major issue on the exam) and the other class that I did this, but sort of half-assed, I got an A- despite writing one paragraph for a question worth 33% question because I blanked out. Once you've learned the outline cold, take a few old exam questions and do timed exams on ExamSoft. Your focus is to type out the blackletter law as you've been doing and then actually apply it to the facts. Review your answer by yourself, then with a professor (if you can reach them/they'll allow this) and finally compare against old exam answers. Many people will disagree with this but once you do a few of these timed exams, you'll start to notice repeating patterns in terms of the issues tested, answer structures, etc (there can only be so many and also many professors are creatures of habit). 
    • Had a similar thing happen: What can you tell me about person X? Should I know person X? They mentioned you in their interview... I have no idea who this person is...
×
×
  • Create New...