Jump to content
pzabbythesecond

Ryerson Law open for applications this fall

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Ryerson is accepting applications now?

Edited by Ryn
Edited on request so it works better after having been split off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, pzabbythesecond said:

Ryerson is accepting applications now?

They seem to offer 1Ls only half the amount of constitutional law (class time) provided to osgoode students but fear not their students get the benefit of attending a class called called “Ryerson Law School Bootcamp” instead. 

Oh and “Emotional and Cultural Quotient Bootcamp” is a mandatory class 

https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/law/law-brochure-web.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, healthlaw said:

They seem to offer 1Ls only half the amount of constitutional law (class time) provided to osgoode students but fear not their students get the benefit of attending a class called called “Ryerson Law School Bootcamp” instead. 

Oh and “Emotional and Cultural Quotient Bootcamp” is a mandatory class 

https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/law/law-brochure-web.pdf

 

What an absolute joke...

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, healthlaw said:

They seem to offer 1Ls only half the amount of constitutional law (class time) provided to osgoode students but fear not their students get the benefit of attending a class called called “Ryerson Law School Bootcamp” instead. 

Oh and “Emotional and Cultural Quotient Bootcamp” is a mandatory class 

https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/law/law-brochure-web.pdf

I don't know. Emotional intelligence and mental illness as a required 1L course may not be a bad idea given how it's so prevalent in law school and the legal profession and a neglected topic. 

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Simbaa said:

I don't know. Emotional intelligence and mental illness as a required 1L course may not be a bad idea given how it's so prevalent in law school and the legal profession and a neglected topic. 

It’s a 3L course. And it’s emotional and cultural intelligence which doesn’t sound like it will be focused on mental illness but who knows. 

I agree that mental illness is something we should talk about in our profession but not in a mandatory classes. I don’t think half of Ryerson’s classes should be mandatory but then again I would never go there so I’m not their target audience I guess 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Split from the chances thread. 

As a side note, I think this discussion is worth having but let’s try and not get it locked like last time, mmk

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, healthlaw said:

They seem to offer 1Ls only half the amount of constitutional law (class time) provided to osgoode students but fear not their students get the benefit of attending a class called called “Ryerson Law School Bootcamp” instead. 

Oh and “Emotional and Cultural Quotient Bootcamp” is a mandatory class 

https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/law/law-brochure-web.pdf

As a side note that brochure is terrible. Could they not have come up with a better sales pitch at the end than “our LPP stats are great because it’s designed to place everyone somewhere (just like a car is designed to drive, so here are some stats about how 100% of sold Fords are capable of driving); also a totally unrelated clinic has created a ton of startups. GO RYERSON LAW!”

  • Like 6
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, healthlaw said:

They seem to offer 1Ls only half the amount of constitutional law (class time) provided to osgoode students but fear not their students get the benefit of attending a class called called “Ryerson Law School Bootcamp” instead. 

 Oh and “Emotional and Cultural Quotient Bootcamp” is a mandatory class 

 https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/law/law-brochure-web.pdf

Aren't all the black letter law courses half-year? I don't know if they're doing more classtime per semester, but I'm not sure I would be comfortable learning 50% less contract and criminal law than every other Canadian grad. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, realpseudonym said:

Aren't all the black letter law courses half-year? I don't know if they're doing more classtime per semester, but I'm not sure I would be comfortable learning 50% less contract and criminal law than every other Canadian grad. 

I honestly doubt it's literally half the law. You can double the hours of those classes and cover it in half the time, for example.

I'm pretty sure Osgoode has some classes finish in the first term, for example, and people apply with those final grades to 1L recruitment positions (I think? Someone from Oz can confirm).

My basic point is, until the hourly break down of those classes become apparent, we can't nor should assume they're teaching half the law. They still need to train graduates which the LSO deems competently trained.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, pzabbythesecond said:


My basic point is, until the hourly break down of those classes become apparent, we can't nor should assume they're teaching half the law. They still need to train graduates which the LSO deems competently trained.

Isn't it FLSC who determines this? The same FLSC that sets an unbelievably low bar with the NCA exams? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Eeee said:

Isn't it FLSC who determines this? The same FLSC that sets an unbelievably low bar with the NCA exams? 

I don't actually know. I'm just saying let's go with the safer assumption, until more information comes to light.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think their whole selling point is how they are different from existing law schools, all of these nouveau sounding initiatives are meant to act as justifications for why a Ryerson law school was needed in the first place. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, spicyfoodftw said:

I'm clearly out of the loop, but I thought that the whole Ryerson thing fell of the track?

It is still a go but without any provincial funding or affiliation. By extension of this, prospective law students at Ryerson would not qualify for provincial benefits such as OSAP etc. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

apologies for the triple post, but I for one am interested in seeing how Ryerson competes with the existing Toronto schools. Location wise, I have heard so many people say they would pick Ryerson over Osgoode 😮 😮 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hopefullawapplicant said:

apologies for the triple post, but I for one am interested in seeing how Ryerson competes with the existing Toronto schools. Location wise, I have heard so many people say they would pick Ryerson over Osgoode 😮 😮 

Ryerson is more proximate to favourable areas (Downtown Toronto, annex, financial district, entertainment districts/various bar/pub strips) than Oz.

Ryerson area itself isn't better than Oz. It may even be worse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I could be wrong but is this not the worst possible place right now in the Country to start another law school?
 

Edited by Dreamer89
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, pzabbythesecond said:

Ryerson is more proximate to favourable areas (Downtown Toronto, annex, financial district, entertainment districts/various bar/pub strips) than Oz.

Ryerson area itself isn't better than Oz. It may even be worse. 

Ok, Ryerson location is way better than Oz even if we only take say like 200 meters from each campus. Yes, there’s nothing east of Ryerson, but, Bay/Yonge and Dundas/College/Queen are way better than... welp, I don’t even know what landmarks to mention around York campus... plus ryerson has some cool landmarks by it like YD Square, Nathan Philips/City Hall, Eaton Centre, Court of Appeal, etc.

But yes, also being on downtown subway line and proximity to even cooler neighbourhoods is also key. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That was not at all clear.  When you said "do I have to disclose that?" it seemed that you were asking for an opinion based on your similar situation.  At no point was it clear that you were saying that you got in despite working at a family business.  I think that is maybe what you were saying?  It still isn't clear.     Time for a tangentially related rant (although one of my biggest pet peeves on this site)...Although I agree that it isn't a real issue, I would also caution anyone on this site about relying on that sort of anecdotal advice (i.e. it wasn't a problem for me, so you're fine!).  As I've repeatedly said on this site, comments like "I didn't use two academic reference letters despite the school saying that's what they preferred" or "I used a TA as a reference letter, so you'll be fine doing that" aren't helpful.  Those may have been strikes against a student in the application process that they were admitted in spite of and not advice to follow.  
    • Is that what the argument is about? Whether humanities profs are generally more left-leaning than the broader population? They are. I thought that was widely acknowledged. I also thought seizing the academy was an explicit goal, much like conservative law students in the US explicitly set themselves the task of seizing the judiciary. I remember being an undergrad and participating in lots of conversations about how the academy needed to be made more politically correct. I remember law school where students actively campaigned against convocation speakers that didn’t represent their values. They wrote articles about what type of faculty should be hired and what should not. None of that is nefarious - that’s the stuff of politics. The ‘law schools are biased’ claim I always hear is that conservatives are outnumbered and therefore these great defenders of freedom and inheritors of Enlightenment ideals feel gun-shy about sharing their opinions. I just can’t imagine how I could plausibly care any less about that than I already do. But I’m willing to try.
    • No ways. If you're on the waitlist it means they've already extended the amount of interviews that should everyone accept there's no slot for you. Only if people decline will you move up. Wouldn't make sense otherwise - they can't just revoke someone else's interview offer because they liked your continued interest email.
    • I don't think it really matters.  Just say that you worked at x business doing x in the office.  You still haven't provided enough information about your role for me to assess whether a law school would look upon it favourably (i.e. you had an important role, you were developing some sort of useful skill, etc.).  However, based on your last few comments,  I think that you are more concerned about their unfavourable impressions (due to it being a family business).  I don't think they would care.  But I also don't think that you have to disclose it.  Many of the work experiences of law school applicants are nepotistic (family, family friends, etc.).  It isn't a big deal.
×
×
  • Create New...