Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Yabbie

How does Sask calculate Best 2?

Recommended Posts

My undergraduate record is a bit spotty- I did one semester one and one off. Also I did part time studies- two or three courses here and there, a bunch of spring and summer classes. How would Sask calculate those? Do they just look at the best 20 credits overall? Best full semesters?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Straight off the UofS Law website:

"The Admissions Committee looks at your best two (2) full years undergraduate GPA. The best two years do not have to be consecutive, but you do need at least 24 credits in each of these years during the Fall and Winter sessions. They do not look at Spring or Summer classes in calculating your best two-year GPA. Your best two-year GPA and the LSAT score are considered in assessing your application."

So if you didn't at least take four classes each 'regular' semester for two full years then you may be in a bind, or, and a big or, you may technically be ineligible to apply until you take two full years comprised of at least 24 credits in regular semesters.

So to answer your question directly, absolutely not best 20 credits overall, and not full semesters, but rather you're best two years: be they consecutive years or non-consecutive.

Edited by thesizzlingwok

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/26/2019 at 10:57 AM, thesizzlingwok said:

So if you didn't at least take four classes each 'regular' semester for two full years then you may be in a bind, or, and a big or, you may technically be ineligible to apply until you take two full years comprised of at least 24 credits in regular semesters.

 

To clarify, this is only needed to qualify for the best two-years GPA calculation; it is not a requirement for admission. Also from the Law website:

"We calculate both a best-two full years grade point average and an overall grade point average in undergraduate study. We require a minimum of 24 credit units in the fall and winter terms per year in order to calculate a best-two years grade point average."

So, @Yabbie, if you do not have enough credits for the best two-years calculation then they will simply look at your overall GPA (so long as you have a minimum of 60 credits).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SCC said:

To clarify, this is only needed to qualify for the best two-years GPA calculation; it is not a requirement for admission. Also from the Law website:

"We calculate both a best-two full years grade point average and an overall grade point average in undergraduate study. We require a minimum of 24 credit units in the fall and winter terms per year in order to calculate a best-two years grade point average."

So, @Yabbie, if you do not have enough credits for the best two-years calculation then they will simply look at your overall GPA (so long as you have a minimum of 60 credits).

Ah yes!! Good catch! Sorry for any confusion @Yabbie! Thanks for catching that. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems incredibly biased towards K-JDs- who often have 4 or 5 years of full time courses to pick from. Those of us who couldn't afford to do that have to swallow the cGPA. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Yabbie said:

Seems incredibly biased towards K-JDs- who often have 4 or 5 years of full time courses to pick from. Those of us who couldn't afford to do that have to swallow the cGPA. 

While I understand what you mean, they have to have some way of standardizing it I guess. Part of their thinking, like calculating things like Dean's List awards etc., is how are we going to compare someone taking five classes in fall and spring semesters for a total of ten to someone who took ten over four different semesters. Part of the thinking behind it is if you're taking a partial load in school that it should be much easier to attain higher grades with a lighter load. While we all kinda know that isn't necessarily true - that people have lives outside of schools that are often much busier than school - that's how they see it. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I added up U of T's tuition fees in each year ($38,233.45 for 1L, $38,183.45 for each of 2 and 3L), and then subtracted the sum of UBC's tuition ($12,639.36 for 1L and $11,849.40 for each of 2 and 3L).  In fairness, I did miss UBC's student fees, which are "approximately $1,100 per year for J.D. students", so I guess that drops the price difference to $74,962.19.
    • That is what mine has been for months as well. 
    • Here is some more information that I just learned from calling a few schools, for anyone interested in this topic and reading this thread.  When determining cGPA, all ontario schools go by what OLSAS provides, and OLSAS counts all courses taken at an undergraduate level regardless of whether they are counting towards a degree or not. How schools look at L2 is internal and possibly different for each school.  Schools outside of Ontario because they dont go through OLSAS probably also have their own way of looking at cGPA and L2.
    • How did you get to 78,262? I assumed the UofT tuition to be $33,300 and UBC tuition to be $12000. On-campus UBC residence seems to be slightly more expensive compared to grad house at UofT
    • I read that all Canadian law school provide good legal education. What constitutes a good legal education? Ability to find employment, good professors, better network, good clinical opportunities? What would be considered a 'bad legal education'?
×
×
  • Create New...