Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just got the email!

cGPA: 3.52

LSAT: 156

Not surprised, but damn, that email oddly made me feel good inside? It was a nice way to be rejected

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the email

3.71 CGPA 162 LSAT K-JD

Anyone else get a really long email saying they should apply as a transfer student or again next year if they don't go anywhere else? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Got the email today. 

cGPA: 3.65

LSAT: 162

Last name starting with H. 

Edited by bebe97

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rejected today 

gpa 2.8 lsat 157 l2 somewhere above 3.3 

strong ECs, certificate from Duke in the US, internship with the UN, 1 and a half years work experience in a law firm and a masters degree from university of Toronto

still waiting to hear from Ottawa Osgoode and queens but not very hopeful at third point

last name starts with m

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Lawstudent97 said:

Just got the email

3.71 CGPA 162 LSAT K-JD

Anyone else get a really long email saying they should apply as a transfer student or again next year if they don't go anywhere else? 

 

I got the long written email! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the email! Had very low expectations with this one so I'm cool with it. (Also already got into Oz so that helps)

GPA - 3.72

LSAT - 164

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got the email just now.

cGPA: 3.5

LSAT: 155

As a current fourth year at UofT, I'm honestly very ecstatic to be approaching my final days in this extremely unpleasant, money-hungry, apathetic institution. Good luck to everyone else and see ya never UofT. 😎

  • Like 5
  • Haha 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TrevorPhilips said:

Got the email just now.

cGPA: 3.5

LSAT: 155

As a current fourth year at UofT, I'm honestly very ecstatic to be approaching my final days in this extremely unpleasant, money-hungry, apathetic institution. Good luck to everyone else and see ya never UofT. 😎

never heard truer words

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the email as well

cGPA: 3.5

LSAT: 162

Last name starts with Q

Not really expecting this one, but disheartening nonetheless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also got my rejection. Also not surprised, teensy bit bummed though as I will be moving to Ontario (Windsor) from Vancouver and know people in Toronto. 

cGPA 3.05, L2: 3.81, B3: 3.81, LSAT 162

Best of luck to everyone for the rest of the admissions cycle!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the email, not surprised just applied for the shts and gigs. My lsat aint the best

L2: 3.8/ B3: 3.73 Cgpa: 3.5

LSAT: 153

Strong EC's, outstanding reference letters and strong personal statement. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Just got the email. 

cGPA: 3.67 B3: 3.77

LSAT: 163

 

Edited by jjbb2020

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got the email 

cgpa 3.57 l2 3.79 

lsat 162 

Nice of them to let us know before April 1 so we can accept other offers I think! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rejected.

160 LSAT

CGPA 3.56

L2. 3.74

Work history as first responder and in law enforcement and good recommendations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hi,   I was just wondering if my reference would need to write one general reference letter that is applicable to every school or a targeted reference letter to each school. On the OUAC website it says that only one version is allowed so I am pretty confused.    Thanks in advance for the help!  
    • Going to help Ryn out when I can. I have the same experiences as them.  The review teams do not have the previous files, but we can request the information from admin if we needed it.  Practically speaking though, the scenario you're worrying about will not happen. It's quite rare for us to look at your previous application.  That being said I've always been of the opinion that you should tell the committee about your experiences. No reason to remove them IMHO 
    • There are a lot of recent topics on this website that you can review that discuss ways a new call can obtain employment. I was called in June 2019 and got my current job off of contacting a partner from a firm that was hiring in one practice area and providing him with an application package. I then did two interview with them, as per normal. Other people I know tended to do the same thing, rather than relying on Indeed, etc., just because it is so competitive and unless you are a superstar, it can be hard to distinguish yourself. 
    • If OP went to TRU in 1L then UBC in 2L, I'd assume they just didn't have strong cover letters/resumes. I'm in 3L at TRU and received 9 Vancouver OCIs with the following grades: A-, B+, B+, B, B, B, B. I had heard rumours that transferring to UBC from TRU/UVic looks bad to employers unless you had a compelling reason to transfer (family issues, you got married, etc.). I have no idea how true that is, so yeah.
    • Its mostly hyperbole for the pace of it part, I don't really see myself holding a tin can and a sign that reads "Will review contracts for Food".  There is nothing wrong of course with teaching fundamental skills. Just borrowing a page from say, physics. They teach fundamental theories and its very important to. But its laterally supplanted with learning how to use sophisticated machinery, and now supplanted with learning how to design and program simulation models. We spend like, an hour a week learning to use Westlaw and Quicklaw which are the tools of yesterday. We learn nothing about how these tools are going to operate. But yes, case summaries have not changed. It literally went unchanged for over a decade. Not for criminal law obviously, but the summaries I looked at were virtually identical to mine in teaching ratios and so-on with the same cases used. My point wasn't that it isn't useful; but the way of teaching it has not adapted yet and this is IMO problematic.  Sorry I seem very bitter and so-on, but I am just kind of frustrated with how archaic some of the curriculum for law schools generally seems to be entering my second year. 
×
×
  • Create New...