Jump to content
NFLDFree

Political View Biases at Universities

Recommended Posts

On 3/11/2019 at 11:02 PM, darklightness said:

Isn't it general consensus that most higher education institutions are left-leaning?

We will find out tomorrow. If they defend Trudeau enough said. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Constant said:

We will find out tomorrow. If they defend Trudeau enough said. 

And if they don't, you'll shut the fuck up about their supposed bias?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Rashabon said:

And if they don't, you'll shut the fuck up about their supposed bias?

Sure... if when they do you’ll apologize for defending their bias.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, theycancallyouhoju said:

Why would a university issue a statement on this? 

They won’t. It will be more subtle. Individual professors. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that what the argument is about? Whether humanities profs are generally more left-leaning than the broader population?

They are. I thought that was widely acknowledged. I also thought seizing the academy was an explicit goal, much like conservative law students in the US explicitly set themselves the task of seizing the judiciary. I remember being an undergrad and participating in lots of conversations about how the academy needed to be made more politically correct. I remember law school where students actively campaigned against convocation speakers that didn’t represent their values. They wrote articles about what type of faculty should be hired and what should not. None of that is nefarious - that’s the stuff of politics.

The ‘law schools are biased’ claim I always hear is that conservatives are outnumbered and therefore these great defenders of freedom and inheritors of Enlightenment ideals feel gun-shy about sharing their opinions. I just can’t imagine how I could plausibly care any less about that than I already do. But I’m willing to try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Constant said:

Sure... if when they do you’ll apologize for defending their bias.  

No, I think the bias is good because it makes whiny conservatives like you fill your diaper.

Your first thought on hearing the Prime Minister did something racist was run to bump an old thread to try and score points for your “team”, because to you the racism isn’t really the issue, it’s just an opportunity to poke a lib in the eye.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Rashabon said:

No, I think the bias is good because it makes whiny conservatives like you fill your diaper.

The only thing predictable is your immediate recourse to personal attacks. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bringing back a six month old thread to clearly start an argument really isn't helpful, even to the topic of the six month old thread. And look, exactly what could have been predicted would be the result, has happened!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know people who've lateralled into mid-sized/large firms after articling in smaller commercial real estate practices. Litigation is fairly abroad. What kind of litigation are we talking about here? Civil? Because it is far too early to give up on a field like commercial real estate that a) has tons of work/business and b) not everyone can go into because not every firm practices in the area. You've got your foot in the door. Just keep at it and you'll land something. 
    • I'm currently taking my gap year working in a field related to my degree in business. If I had the necessary LSAT mark to get in this year, I likely would've just gone straight into law to be honest. But, as I sit here now, I think it may actually be more beneficial to me in the end to take this gap year for 3 main reasons: 1) Gain valuable experience working in a professional field. I also think working in a professional field will strengthen my application, as I currently do not have a lot of EC's. 2) $$$ - making money over this gap year will certainly be a big help when it comes time to pay for law school 3) Allows me to explore a job related to my degree to see whether it is something that I would be interested in pursuing further in the future. I don't know exactly what your degree is in, but who knows, maybe you'll get a job related to your degree and find that you enjoy it so much that you'd rather put off law school entirely or at least for another few years I definitely don't think taking a year off lowers your chances of getting in. If anything it strengthens your chances (obviously being dependent on what you're doing with your year off). For example: I imagine volunteering, working in a professional field, and taking part in other positive EC's would all be looked upon favourably by the admissions committee. I think it all just depends on what you do during your gap year. In the end, would I likely have gone straight into law if I had the LSAT mark? Yes. However, looking at it now, I think taking this gap year will certainly be more beneficial to me in the long-run.
    • I articled in a boutique commercial real estate law firm, but received more experience in litigation vs. solicitor work. I’m interested in solicitor work, but the particular firm I articled at didn’t have much work to give me except in litigation. I have some experience in drafting commercial leases, a residential agreement of purchase and sale, and other commercial agreements (e.g licenses and telecommunication access agreements) and I assisted in title review of a large commercial deal - but that’s about it. I’ve been applying for associate positions for awhile, but they all want 2-3 years of transactional experience. Should I give up and focus on applying for litigation jobs (where I have more experience)? Does anyone have experience being hired in commercial real estate with minimum experience? I’d really appreciate some insight into this from anyone with experience in commercial real estate. I’ve been networking, and the firm I articled at gave me good reference letters, but they’re not really willing to go the extra mile and refer me to contacts they know of (and I’ve asked / hinted). So now I’m wondering if I should give up the search and apply for litigation positions, even though practicing in commercial real estate is my dream. Any advice?
    • If your stats are accurate, you're safe applying to your top 3 and saving money by not applying to the rest.
×
×
  • Create New...