Jump to content
akratic

Clerkships 2019

Recommended Posts

I thought a thread was in order. Also, for those applying to clerk at BCCA, does it seem odd that the "detailed questionnaire" on which they apparently decide their short-list doesn't allow you to include much info and doesn't match up with the sample questionnaire in the job posting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely agree. My resume looked awful when transferred to plain text. No concerns about the questionnaire though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BlockedQuebecois said:

It should be illegal to make people submit plain text resumes and cover letters now a days 

Ha. 

Was this just at the BCCA? I looked for formatting requirements in the FC system guidelines and thought I didn't see any...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/17/2019 at 5:55 PM, akratic said:

I thought a thread was in order. Also, for those applying to clerk at BCCA, does it seem odd that the "detailed questionnaire" on which they apparently decide their short-list doesn't allow you to include much info and doesn't match up with the sample questionnaire in the job posting?

I noticed this too. Not quite sure what happened there. Maybe they decided to trim down the questionnaire, but the "sample" reflected an older version? I know there have been changes to the application process this year (such as extending the deadline). 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was the same issue last year. It was really confusing because I prepped all my material ahead of time. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found last year's clerkship thread useful for keeping track of when people had heard back from various courts (and not stressing too much until that happened). It doesn't look like one exists yet for this year, so to that end: please post when you get called for an interview!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know how ONCA interviews get scheduled? My family wants to go away for one of the two weeks they do interviews and I’m not sure if I should join them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, LawGuy1995 said:

Does anyone know how ONCA interviews get scheduled? My family wants to go away for one of the two weeks they do interviews and I’m not sure if I should join them.

From what I hear, they just give you a time and date and you have no input at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does ONCA or BCCA send out a confirmation notice that they received your materials?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, akratic said:

Does ONCA or BCCA send out a confirmation notice that they received your materials?

BCCA does not, as far as I can recall.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anybody heard about BC clerkship interviews yet? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SeniorLopez247 said:

Got a call from the FC yesterday.

Any tips for the interview?

Depends on your judge. Also depends on why you think you may be a good candidate for that particular judge. You may be interviewed because you attend a law school that the judge interviewing you has a strong connection with. You may be hired on grades or references. You may be hired on expertise. Be prepared to answer questions related to any or all of those.

For example, I was picked for interview (and hired) quite substantially based on my references and expertise. Accordingly, I prepped myself to answer questions related to how I knew and what kind of relationship I had with my references. I also could speak quite extensively on my expertise. Re the latter, I was also provided a choice of 4 or 5 recent decisions of my judge to discuss at the interview. Naturally, I read them all, and prepped a few of those.

Even if you do not get a decision to prep, it is probably a great idea to review a few recent decisions of theirs anyway--especially any with discussion online, either positive or negative (I would avoid focusing on anything that has been extensively criticized; but depending on the interviewing judge, it may reflect positively on you to show honesty and a willingness to disagree. WARNING: TREAD CAUTIOUSLY).

Get familiar with the FC's jurisdiction and some of its basic procedure. Be familiar with the types of law that the FC has jurisdiction over. You don't need to go down a rabbit-hole of learning all of Maritime law, but if you read a few Admin, IP, Privacy, First Nations etc. Law decisions, you'll get the picture.

Seems trivial, but if you've never done it before, practice saying "Your Honour" until it flows naturally. 

Finally, as with all interviews, the most important thing is to develop phenomenal answers to these two questions: 1. Why do you want to work at the FC (and even better, why for this particular judge); 2. Why should the FC (and this particular judge) hire you.

Good luck!

Edited by FineCanadianFXs
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, FineCanadianFXs said:

Depends on your judge. Also depends on why you think you may be a good candidate for that particular judge. You may be interviewed because you attend a law school that the judge interviewing you has a strong connection with. You may be hired on grades or references. You may be hired on expertise. Be prepared to answer questions related to any or all of those.

For example, I was picked for interview (and hired) quite substantially based on my references and expertise. Accordingly, I prepped myself to answer questions related to how I knew and what kind of relationship I had with my references. I also could speak quite extensively on my expertise. Re the latter, I was also provided a choice of 4 or 5 recent decisions of my judge to discuss at the interview. Naturally, I read them all, and prepped a few of those.

Even if you do not get a decision to prep, it is probably a great idea to review a few recent decisions of theirs anyway--especially any with discussion online, either positive or negative (I would avoid focusing on anything that has been extensively criticized; but depending on the interviewing judge, it may reflect positively on you to show honesty and a willingness to disagree. WARNING: TREAD CAUTIOUSLY).

Get familiar with the FC's jurisdiction and some of its basic procedure. Be familiar with the types of law that the FC has jurisdiction over. You don't need to go down a rabbit-hole of learning all of Maritime law, but if you read a few Admin, IP, Privacy, First Nations etc. Law decisions, you'll get the picture.

Seems trivial, but if you've never done it before, practice saying "Your Honour" until it flows naturally. 

Finally, as with all interviews, the most important thing is to develop phenomenal answers to these two questions: 1. Why do you want to work at the FC (and even better, why for this particular judge); 2. Why should the FC (and this particular judge) hire you.

Good luck!

Thanks! I didn’t expect such a detailed answer.

I didn’t get any materials to read for the interview, but I did read up on cases the judge has decided and further into their area of speciality. That’s on top of research on the court and jurisdiction, etc. 

Fingers crossed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's always a good idea to be in touch with the current clerks, especially if they are grads of your law school. Clerks are often very involved in the interview/hiring process. You'd be surprised how many applicants never do this.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a call from Justice Woods from FCA! Anyone have any tips for interviewing with her, especially for someone with 0 tax knowledge?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody heard from the BC Courts yet? Apparently their interviews start on February 4 (ie. this coming Monday) but I haven't heard of anybody being contacted, which seems odd.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "similar wealth to my own what they were getting" Do they also have similar available resources, expenses, accumulated educational debts and personal reasons....... "The primary criterion for receipt of a bursary is financial need. Decisions are made based on a variety of considerations, including available resources, expenses, accumulated educational debt and personal factors, including medical and familial circumstances.  
    • Academic:  Going to echo The Scientist because he usually always explains UOttawa's depth quite well. Our faculty size for the English Section is the largest with 50+ fulltimes, 30 part time (technically, in reality they have job functions non-purely academic but teach courses, since we have non-JD stuff like the National Program for training QC lawyers in commonlaw, a bunch of faculty-run legal clinics/public interest groups intervening in the SCC, etc. ). Research at the faculty is also pretty strong but the university isn't that good at branding itself; e.g. our environmental law faculty has the most depth including the very best career lawyers in Canada and our tech law faculty has the most influential people in Canada for tech-related areas of law. We have people from the foremost torts scholar in Canada (former dean too) and a former Attorney General teaching 1Ls.  Other positive notes: Significant amount of panels, talks, issues and engaging topics. This ranges from the obvious SCC lawyers/Federal Courts cases where a bunch of lawyers go from the court house to panels at UOttawa, many corporate lawyers from Ottawa/Toronto, many specific interest groups (Aboriginal law, feminist law, technology law, federal law, public international law etc)  and many visiting lawyers and academics in Ottawa. The thing about Ottawa is that it functions as a sort of "gathering place" for people from all across Canada/the world so there's lots of big events in town where some people also do things at UO.  We also have a strong "revolving door" of sessional instructors, you will very likely get one per semester. They are usually hits but they are also working people with full jobs and a law graduate degree (e.g. the guy who teaches my course is an awesome first-timer and went to HYS school for an LLM). They are also fantastic people to talk to for career advice.  Downsides: We do not have nearly the depth as Queens or a few schools in advanced corporate law courses; classes can be very full sometimes (50-60 per class is typical).  Community:  Upsides: More mature community than other law schools, like 30% of the class has had career experience or a graduate degree and the average age is like 25-26. While the majority just got out of undergrad, the two groups mix quite well. I've known many people who worked for the Feds or Prov government, worked in Bay Street, did advanced research MSc's, etc. I have honestly learned alot from my classmates and each bring great life experience.  We have lots of student groups; arguably many of the X Field of Law Students Association do not do regular events except panels and bake sales but you will find lots of proactive interest-specific groups/clubs/event organizations. Getting engaged in student life can be very tricky but it requires looking in the right place.  We also got to meet the SCC at an event hosted on their lawn; it was fantastic. The Faculty seems to be the most well-connected in Canada.  Downsides: Overcrowded building; they shuffle a lot of undergrads into a few rooms and they are often in our libraries. Alot of law students were pushing for a ban of undergrads. Civ Law also uses our space and we operate like two parallel worlds. The community is less tied together; there is definitely a weaker sense of community outside of your large group (70-80) or small section  (15-20). Part of this is due to the inept law student society imo and the lack of community-building events of the orientation which did not have any social events. They virtually guarantee that cliques will (and has always) formed just by the nature of how they structured the first week. English Common Law have far few events that bring people together and French Common Law (1/5th the class) are pretty much in their own bubble. Civil Law tends to dominate the libraries though; hard-working but we have basically parallel worlds.  I honestly think this can be fixed by just giving us our own student spaces and lounge areas; offices and rooms for student groups and making it appear more community-friendly. They were supposed to give us a new building a while back but UOttawa instead spent it elsewhere. Taking proactive effort in the first 3 weeks with community-making social events and breaking the barriers that develop is also something the admin can do.   Other Notes: It can feel like "Going to Work" in some sense; our school is probably less student-focused given the school plays a significant functional role for the legal profession, Canada, and specific interests/issues. For example there was an event honoring a great Ontario judge attended by many lawyers and well-to-do judiciary members including the SCC right beside my evening class; it was definitely open to all students though.
    • Generally speaking, of a 4-year degree, U of C considers only the last 2 years-worth of courses (last 60 of a total of 120 credits). Regardless of whether they transfer or not.  If you went to a university outside of Canada, then you will want to contact admissions with your specifics.
    • Can anyone help? I understand that your last 60 credits are considered for your gpa calculation but what If you go to a different university than UofA? do all the degree level classes count towards gpa? Even if they don't transfer to the Uofa? 
    • Can anyone help? I understand that your last 60 credits are considered for your gpa calculation but what If you go to a different university than Calgary? do all the degree level classes count towards gpa? Even if they don't transfer to the UofC? 
×