Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
akratic

Clerkships 2019

Recommended Posts

I thought a thread was in order. Also, for those applying to clerk at BCCA, does it seem odd that the "detailed questionnaire" on which they apparently decide their short-list doesn't allow you to include much info and doesn't match up with the sample questionnaire in the job posting?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I completely agree. My resume looked awful when transferred to plain text. No concerns about the questionnaire though?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, BlockedQuebecois said:

It should be illegal to make people submit plain text resumes and cover letters now a days 

Ha. 

Was this just at the BCCA? I looked for formatting requirements in the FC system guidelines and thought I didn't see any...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/17/2019 at 5:55 PM, akratic said:

I thought a thread was in order. Also, for those applying to clerk at BCCA, does it seem odd that the "detailed questionnaire" on which they apparently decide their short-list doesn't allow you to include much info and doesn't match up with the sample questionnaire in the job posting?

I noticed this too. Not quite sure what happened there. Maybe they decided to trim down the questionnaire, but the "sample" reflected an older version? I know there have been changes to the application process this year (such as extending the deadline). 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was the same issue last year. It was really confusing because I prepped all my material ahead of time. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found last year's clerkship thread useful for keeping track of when people had heard back from various courts (and not stressing too much until that happened). It doesn't look like one exists yet for this year, so to that end: please post when you get called for an interview!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know how ONCA interviews get scheduled? My family wants to go away for one of the two weeks they do interviews and I’m not sure if I should join them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, LawGuy1995 said:

Does anyone know how ONCA interviews get scheduled? My family wants to go away for one of the two weeks they do interviews and I’m not sure if I should join them.

From what I hear, they just give you a time and date and you have no input at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, akratic said:

Does ONCA or BCCA send out a confirmation notice that they received your materials?

BCCA does not, as far as I can recall.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, SeniorLopez247 said:

Got a call from the FC yesterday.

Any tips for the interview?

Depends on your judge. Also depends on why you think you may be a good candidate for that particular judge. You may be interviewed because you attend a law school that the judge interviewing you has a strong connection with. You may be hired on grades or references. You may be hired on expertise. Be prepared to answer questions related to any or all of those.

For example, I was picked for interview (and hired) quite substantially based on my references and expertise. Accordingly, I prepped myself to answer questions related to how I knew and what kind of relationship I had with my references. I also could speak quite extensively on my expertise. Re the latter, I was also provided a choice of 4 or 5 recent decisions of my judge to discuss at the interview. Naturally, I read them all, and prepped a few of those.

Even if you do not get a decision to prep, it is probably a great idea to review a few recent decisions of theirs anyway--especially any with discussion online, either positive or negative (I would avoid focusing on anything that has been extensively criticized; but depending on the interviewing judge, it may reflect positively on you to show honesty and a willingness to disagree. WARNING: TREAD CAUTIOUSLY).

Get familiar with the FC's jurisdiction and some of its basic procedure. Be familiar with the types of law that the FC has jurisdiction over. You don't need to go down a rabbit-hole of learning all of Maritime law, but if you read a few Admin, IP, Privacy, First Nations etc. Law decisions, you'll get the picture.

Seems trivial, but if you've never done it before, practice saying "Your Honour" until it flows naturally. 

Finally, as with all interviews, the most important thing is to develop phenomenal answers to these two questions: 1. Why do you want to work at the FC (and even better, why for this particular judge); 2. Why should the FC (and this particular judge) hire you.

Good luck!

Edited by FineCanadianFXs
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, FineCanadianFXs said:

Depends on your judge. Also depends on why you think you may be a good candidate for that particular judge. You may be interviewed because you attend a law school that the judge interviewing you has a strong connection with. You may be hired on grades or references. You may be hired on expertise. Be prepared to answer questions related to any or all of those.

For example, I was picked for interview (and hired) quite substantially based on my references and expertise. Accordingly, I prepped myself to answer questions related to how I knew and what kind of relationship I had with my references. I also could speak quite extensively on my expertise. Re the latter, I was also provided a choice of 4 or 5 recent decisions of my judge to discuss at the interview. Naturally, I read them all, and prepped a few of those.

Even if you do not get a decision to prep, it is probably a great idea to review a few recent decisions of theirs anyway--especially any with discussion online, either positive or negative (I would avoid focusing on anything that has been extensively criticized; but depending on the interviewing judge, it may reflect positively on you to show honesty and a willingness to disagree. WARNING: TREAD CAUTIOUSLY).

Get familiar with the FC's jurisdiction and some of its basic procedure. Be familiar with the types of law that the FC has jurisdiction over. You don't need to go down a rabbit-hole of learning all of Maritime law, but if you read a few Admin, IP, Privacy, First Nations etc. Law decisions, you'll get the picture.

Seems trivial, but if you've never done it before, practice saying "Your Honour" until it flows naturally. 

Finally, as with all interviews, the most important thing is to develop phenomenal answers to these two questions: 1. Why do you want to work at the FC (and even better, why for this particular judge); 2. Why should the FC (and this particular judge) hire you.

Good luck!

Thanks! I didn’t expect such a detailed answer.

I didn’t get any materials to read for the interview, but I did read up on cases the judge has decided and further into their area of speciality. That’s on top of research on the court and jurisdiction, etc. 

Fingers crossed!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's always a good idea to be in touch with the current clerks, especially if they are grads of your law school. Clerks are often very involved in the interview/hiring process. You'd be surprised how many applicants never do this.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a call from Justice Woods from FCA! Anyone have any tips for interviewing with her, especially for someone with 0 tax knowledge?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody heard from the BC Courts yet? Apparently their interviews start on February 4 (ie. this coming Monday) but I haven't heard of anybody being contacted, which seems odd.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I never said it was, and you know that.  Although, to be honest, there's a good argument to be made that academic freedom actually is carte blanche for homophobia/racism/transphobia in an academic capacity (and OP is very clearly talking about the professor's role in an academic capacity). See, for e.g. Jordan Peterson's continued employment at the University of Toronto, J Michael Bailey's continued employment at Northwestern University, etc. 
    • I've read this subject several times. I keep thinking I should say something but no one here knows what the hell is really going on, or ever will. All I can contribute is that I've finally realized why so many people, myself included, approach this subject with such skepticism. And it's because over-sensitive law students are considerably more common than racist/homophobic/sexist/transphobic professors. We can't actually know which of those two things is happening here. But I know if I were playing the odds which one I would bet on. I can still remember when I was in law school, there were a few students so offended by the law they felt that it was an offense against their sensibilities to be forced to listen to it being explained to them in class. I particularly remember (it will probably be stuck in my mind for life) a discussion about the defence of honest but mistaken belief in consent as it relates to sexual assault. There were students so viscerally committed to the position that "if it feels like sexual assault to her, then it is" they literally just couldn't deal with a class which explained that however it might feel to the complainant there could be instances where belief in consent was honestly and fairly founded, which would mean there is no crime. And there were a few examples I can recall of the same pattern of behavior. Racism, homophobia, transphobia, etc. exist. I would never say that people should avoid ever taking a stand, because if no one ever took a stand then things wouldn't change Just for God's sake, if you're going to take a stand, be sure you're standing on firm ground and not that you are magnifying your own sense of outrage into an issue that doesn't really exist outside of your own reactions. I say that both because falling into that second category of behavior is both professionally unwise (no matter how anonymous the process may be, you'll eventually look ridiculous to someone) and because it detracts from properly correcting real racism, real homophobia, etc. We don't really know what's going on in this case. We can't know. All I know is that both possibilities are real. And if the OP has problems hearing about this fact which I know to be true (which hasn't quite happened yet, but it's close) or has issues with not being automatically believed in the total absence of any evidence one way or another (which any rational person would expect) then I'd be more inclined to believe it's the first, and more common scenario, of an excessively sensitive student. But again, we'll never really know.  
    • Saw a blog post that talks about this (tip #1) - https://ontariobarprep.com/blog/3-myths-and-3-tips-for-the-ontario-bar-exams I also preferred using the detailed table of contents. Indices are just extra paper that you have to deal with on exam day(s). 
    • I did OLE because I wanted practice exams and had a discount code, making it the cheapest option.  I think Emond has a database of past indices on their bar prep website. 
    • Does anyone know when the next deadline to accept or decline an offer is?

×
×
  • Create New...