Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Luckycharm

Without family money, can you afford to buy a home?

Recommended Posts

On 1/16/2019 at 1:36 PM, TheScientist101 said:

This is not true for almost every 3-6 year call I know in Toronto (and impossible before 3 year call). As mentioned the issue is the down payment. The prices are rising more quickly than we can save. The majority of family-type houses (i.e. not a condo) are going for close to $1M or over $1M. As soon as you cross the $1M threshold, even as a first time home buyer, you enter 20% down territory. Very few lawyers with several years experience have $200K+ to use as a down payment (and you need lawyer fees, real-estate commission, land transfer tax etc. in addition to that). Working on Bay has many advantages - but owning a home isn't one of them. 

 

Not to pry too much, but does your partner have a similar income? I think it's probably impossible to do on your own, but do you think two Bay salaries could do it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, easttowest said:

Not to pry too much, but does your partner have a similar income? I think it's probably impossible to do on your own, but do you think two Bay salaries could do it?

To save a $200K down payment is the tough part. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, lawstudent20202020 said:

Yup, average detached house price in the Okanagan is ~650k right now which is a massive drop from what it was last year at 750k. Townhouses average 500k and condos 350-400k.

It's not as bad as Toronto or Vancouver but compared to average income (in general not just lawyers) it's pretty tough to get into the market right right now.

Amazing that we are discussing investing in an asset that dropped, on average, 100k in value in a year. I'll stick with my index funds, than you very much. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Luckycharm said:

To save a $200K down payment is the tough part. 

Are you just having it sit in a bank or do you have a long term plan / financial horizon with the money? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, setto said:

Amazing that we are discussing investing in an asset that dropped, on average, 100k in value in a year. I'll stick with my index funds, than you very much

It's terrifying how many people assume that real estate is a guaranteed winner for investing. The situation in Toronto and Vancouver is not normal and sooner or later will come to a grinding halt. It's already starting with sales numbers dropping. Real estate also has a stupid transfer cost and holding costs compared to other investments. Real estate purely as an investment is not a great idea.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, BlockedQuebecois said:

Sure, population wise. But what you’re doing is the same thing as looking at Ontario and saying it’s housing prices are unreasonable because the GTA’s housing prices are unreasonable. 

The interior constitutes all of BC that isn’t coastal or the lower mainland. That includes medium sized cities like Prince George and Kamloops, and smaller cities like Quesnel and Revelstoke. To look at just the Okanagan and declare that the entirety of BC is unaffordable is just silly. 

Prince George isnt in the interior, its northern BC. Kamloops isn't too far behind Kelowna for real estate prices. Revelstoke is rapidly approaching unaffordable levels. If you want to look at the small communities in BC, those are not an option for most people. They have a serious lack of job diversity and most familys that move there only one partner can find work in their field. These are towns of less than 10k people and they are hours away from any major urban centers. It's not like you can just commute from these places into a bigger city for work. So while prices may be lower its just not feasible for most people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, lawstudent20202020 said:

It's terrifying how many people assume that real estate is a guaranteed winner for investing. The situation in Toronto and Vancouver is not normal and sooner or later will come to a grinding halt. It's already starting with sales numbers dropping. Real estate also has a stupid transfer cost and holding costs compared to other investments. Real estate purely as an investment is not a great idea.

 

Agreed. I can understand non-investment reasons for investing in RE, like the consumption of housing, and the psychological satisfaction of owning your own home. 

However, people who have owned houses in Metro Vancouver have made out like bandits since the early 2000’s. House prices have gone up about 6-7x on average since then, and once you factor in the use of leverage, many, many multimillionaires have been minted by the Vancouver real estate market. I guess that’s what happens when you’ve become a dumping ground for ill-gotten money. I don’t think we’ll ever see a run-up like this in residential Vancouver real estate again. Although commercial and industrial are booming here as well right now. They’ll probably stay hot until the next recession, which I’m guessing will be in the next two or three years.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, hitman9172 said:

Agreed. I can understand non-investment reasons for investing in RE, like the consumption of housing, and the psychological satisfaction of owning your own home. 

However, people who have owned houses in Metro Vancouver have made out like bandits since the early 2000’s. House prices have gone up about 6-7x on average since then, and once you factor in the use of leverage, many, many multimillionaires have been minted by the Vancouver real estate market. I guess that’s what happens when you’ve become a dumping ground for ill-gotten money. I don’t think we’ll ever see a run-up like this in residential Vancouver real estate again. Although commercial and industrial are booming here as well right now. They’ll probably stay hot until the next recession, which I’m guessing will be in the next two or three years.

It's going to be interesting to see the impacts of the speculation tax and the transparency legislation both coming into effect this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, lawstudent20202020 said:

Prince George isnt in the interior, its northern BC. Kamloops isn't too far behind Kelowna for real estate prices. Revelstoke is rapidly approaching unaffordable levels. If you want to look at the small communities in BC, those are not an option for most people. They have a serious lack of job diversity and most familys that move there only one partner can find work in their field. These are towns of less than 10k people and they are hours away from any major urban centers. It's not like you can just commute from these places into a bigger city for work. So while prices may be lower its just not feasible for most people.

"The British Columbia Interior, BC Interior or Interior of British Columbia, usually referred to only as the Interior, is one of the three main regions of the Canadian province of British Columbia, the other two being the Lower Mainland, which comprises the overlapping areas of Greater Vancouver and the Fraser Valley, and the Coast, which includes Vancouver Island and also including the Lower Mainland (from the perspective of the Interior)."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia_Interior

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, BlockedQuebecois said:

"The British Columbia Interior, BC Interior or Interior of British Columbia, usually referred to only as the Interior, is one of the three main regions of the Canadian province of British Columbia, the other two being the Lower Mainland, which comprises the overlapping areas of Greater Vancouver and the Fraser Valley, and the Coast, which includes Vancouver Island and also including the Lower Mainland (from the perspective of the Interior)."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Columbia_Interior

I've lived in BC my whole life and everyone I know considers Prince George, ft st John and other towns around there to be northern BC, not the interior. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, lawstudent20202020 said:

I've lived in BC my whole life and everyone I know considers Prince George, ft st John and other towns around there to be northern BC, not the interior. 

Me too. It's still the interior of BC. Northern interior, but the interior nonetheless. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, BlockedQuebecois said:

Me too. It's still the interior of BC. Northern interior, but the interior nonetheless. 

Huh, that's new to me. Guess I should have specified southern interior in my response

Edited by lawstudent20202020

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, lawstudent20202020 said:

Huh, that's new to me. Guess I should have specified southern interior in my response

Having lived a long time in BC, I'm with you. PG is up north. Interior is not.

Edited by easttowest
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, lawstudent20202020 said:

cries in BC. There is only one listing in my area in that range that isn't a time share or mobile home, and it's for a 300sqft studio in the first phase of a new development. And Im 5 hours away from Vancouver.

Ya, I've started watching Love it or List it Vancouver while doing Saturday chores and I'm floored by what I see lol. It puts what I was paying in Toronto to shame...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, setto said:

Are you just having it sit in a bank or do you have a long term plan / financial horizon with the money? 

I was talking about young professionals in general but not myself.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, easttowest said:

Not to pry too much, but does your partner have a similar income? I think it's probably impossible to do on your own, but do you think two Bay salaries could do it?

My wife doesn't have a similar income but she also doesn't have similar debt. 

 Remember - if you are a new call (without family help) you are also saddled with a lot of debt during those first few years and it's difficult to justify saving when you're also trying to pay down the debt at a fast pace. If you both come from that situation then yes, your household income has increased but so have your debt payments. 

Also - let's put this into context, I agree that if you are two new calls looking for a 1 bedroom condo downtown that you could probably pull together the down payment and purchase that between year 3-6 of lawyering. Condos are still outrageous right now though (especially when you consider condo fees). However, for myself, I'm not talking about buying a condo and from what I've seen, most lawyers looking to settle down and buy are also not interested in tying themselves to a tiny condo for the 5 year fixed mortgage.

No, I'm talking about buying an actual house in Toronto (townhouse, semi, detached). It is very, very rare to find one even in the surrounding outskirts of the city (Vaughn, Markham, Richmond Hill, Thorn Hill, Mimico) for under $1M. As soon as you cross that $1M threshold the minimum down payment you can put down is 20%. We are now talking at minimum $200K (plus all of the additional fees which will probably come to $35-50K). 

SO - if you're asking me whether i think that two new calls could together save $200K so they can buy a house between 3-6 years out. It could be possible but I think still very, very difficult. 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, it isn't uncommon out west in some markets but I've never heard of it happening with Ontario employers.
    • Hey everyone,  Ever since I finished articling and started practicing, I can't help but think that I wish I had known more about how much and just how difficult line of credits are to pay back once you start working. If someone had sat me down and gave me a sober and honest take on the reality of the interest costs, etc., I'd like to think I would have spent less on my LOC and have been more cognizant of what all this means when it comes to payback time (that time comes a lot sooner than you think).  I came across this great article posted by a friend that was one of the more honest takes on interest costs and timelines for repayment. I found the numbers used in this article to be on the low side ($54,000 spent on a LOC). Personally, and many of my friends who were on their own for law school, are closer to the $100,000 mark. Regardless, I found the article gave me a new perspective (I just wish I had read this 5 years ago).  If you're starting law school, or at some point through it, YOU NEED TO READ THIS AND YOU NEED TO START THINKING WHAT ALL OF THIS FREE MONEY REALLY MEANS!!! I can't stress this enough. The money that you will have available to start paying back debt is much less than you think (taxes, deductions, living costs, etc.).  I started looking at the site and noticed that it was started by two lawyers as well which makes sense given the amount of content on there specifically geared for young people/students/just starting their careers.  If anyone has similar thoughts, please leave them below and let me know about your experiences. AND IF ANYONE IS IN LAW SCHOOL OR JUST STARTING, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO REACH OUT AND I'LL GLADLY CONNECT WITH YOU TO HOPEFULLY ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE. Just trying to help people avoid making the mistakes that I did. Article here: https://modernmoney.ca/personal-finance/professional-insights-what-does-law-school-really-cost/
    • That isn't how it works in reality. It is largely a matter of resources as barelylegal mentions. My (relatively) small firm typically receives 100+ apps during 2L OCIs for 2 positions. It was a similar number when we didn't hire until the articling recruit. We usually interview ~10 applicants for each position. 
    • I suggest you contact Ottawa Law school directly to find out how they view your application. 168 LSAT is a very impressive score... Your academic performance may be over   Mature Applicants In order to qualify as a mature student, at the time of application: the applicant must have five or more years of work or other non-academic experience since completing secondary school studies; and the period of non-academic experience may include part-time, but not full time, post-secondary studies. In this category, additional consideration will be given to relevant outstanding qualities, as evidenced by previous career and/or life experiences. The academic program in law school is very demanding, so we are looking for a demonstration of capacity for academic success. This usually includes satisfactory completion of at least some courses at the university level. In addition to all the documents listed on our How to Apply page, Mature applicants must also submit to OLSAS an up-to-date résumé or curriculum vitae. Applicants must submit their curriculum vitae or resume via the SAM page in their OLSAS application. If you are unable to obtain a letter of reference from an academic source, please choose referees who are able to speak to your abilities as they relate to law school, namely your ability to analyse, write, conduct research, work in groups, and organize your time. Applicants in this category must be Canadian citizens or permanent residents.
    • Went back to school to improve my GPA and got a 161 lsat on my third attempt. I've also worked in Parliament for an MP for 5 years as well. 

×
×
  • Create New...