Jump to content
harveyspecter993

How much weight is placed on extracurriculars in the 2L recruit?

Recommended Posts

I'm looking for a rough weighting, if possible. (Eg. 30% extracurriculars, 70% grades) Moreover, I've been looking at this year's incoming  summer students and almost all of them seem to have worked in clinics or been on mooting teams. Due to the very high proportion of students with these activities, is it fair to say that at least one of the two is expected/'required' on a resume? If not, what are other respectable activities to have on a resume? Thank you.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I assume you are asking about the Toronto recruit.

With respect to weighting, it depends on the firm, but as a general rule I would say that more emphasis is placed on grades than on extracurriculars. A number of firms have a GPA cut-off.

I think it would be fair to say that some involvement in law school-related extracurriculars is expected. But beyond that, in terms of what activities to have on your resume, it depends on (1) what practice area(s) you think you might be interested in at this point, and (2) what firm(s) you intend on applying to. For example, if in your cover letter to Lenczner you say that all you've ever wanted to do is litigate, but you haven't participated in any advocacy competitions/moots, well, that's probably not going to work out well for you. Similarly, if you say you're primarily interested in business/corporate law, but all of your extra-curricular activities are related to criminal law, that might raise a red flag.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Rearden said:

I assume you are asking about the Toronto recruit.

With respect to weighting, it depends on the firm, but as a general rule I would say that more emphasis is placed on grades than on extracurriculars. A number of firms have a GPA cut-off.

I think it would be fair to say that some involvement in law school-related extracurriculars is expected. But beyond that, in terms of what activities to have on your resume, it depends on (1) what practice area(s) you think you might be interested in at this point, and (2) what firm(s) you intend on applying to. For example, if in your cover letter to Lenczner you say that all you've ever wanted to do is litigate, but you haven't participated in any advocacy competitions/moots, well, that's probably not going to work out well for you. Similarly, if you say you're primarily interested in business/corporate law, but all of your extra-curricular activities are related to criminal law, that might raise a red flag.

Yes the Toronto recruit. What's the highest GPA cutoff you've heard of?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, harveyspecter993 said:

Yes the Toronto recruit. What's the highest GPA cutoff you've heard of?

I don't think these information are posted any where. I think the cut off (if there is one) may not be the same for every school.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, extracurriculars are important in the 2L recruit, but there aren't specific things that are effectively required in order for someone to be viewed as competitive.

Think about why extracurriculars would be important at that stage. The Toronto 2L recruit takes place at the beginning of 2L. By that time, the only courses you've completed are your 1L courses, which are entirely (or nearly entirely? I can't speak for every school) standardized across 1L students. So, beyond your performance in one class over another, there isn't much to tell employers what you're interested in doing.

Extracurriculars do that. Interested in criminal, corporate, IP law? Join the criminal, corporate, IP law club and actually participate. Interested in advocacy? Do a moot or clinic. Extracurriculars can show employers what your interests are, and also show that you're capable of balancing commitments beyond your coursework (so when you say in a cover letter that you're good at time management and balancing priorities, you can actually point to something that demonstrates it).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Something else to consider is that those kinds of extracurriculars often require above-average grades. That is not to say that every student with good grades works at a clinic or is on a moot team, but the profile of a student selected to those activities and one hired in the recruit is similar.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you referring strictly to law-school extracurriculars? I think having a Moot / Clinic / Journal experience can be useful, particularly as talking points in an interview. However grades will almost always be your point of entry to securing that interview - I don't know about cutoffs but most recruiters I know will emphasize grades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Extracurriculars generally will not make up for otherwise mediocre/average marks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/13/2019 at 10:29 AM, harveyspecter993 said:

Yes the Toronto recruit. What's the highest GPA cutoff you've heard of?

I haven't heard of any specific cutoffs and I wouldn't want to speculate beyond saying that the conventional wisdom is that a B+ average is competitive for most Bay St positions, so I would imagine that cutoffs would be lower -- perhaps somewhere in the B to B- range.

That said, I don't think anyone should make decisions about which firm(s) to apply to based on speculation about GPA cutoffs.

On 1/14/2019 at 1:45 PM, easttowest said:

Something else to consider is that those kinds of extracurriculars often require above-average grades. That is not to say that every student with good grades works at a clinic or is on a moot team, but the profile of a student selected to those activities and one hired in the recruit is similar.  

I'm not so sure that there is a correlation. Whether or not grades matter for involvement in extracurriculars depends on the school. At Western, for example, with the possible exception of the Jessup Moot, I don't think grades mattered much, if at all, in terms of getting involved in moots and clinics. Sure, there are some extracurriculars -- e.g. TA/research assistant positions -- for which good 1L grades appear to be a requirement. However, most (perhaps all) of the 1L moots are open to whoever wants to participate, and Western holds an internal advocacy competition -- a tryout of sorts -- to determine who gets to participate in the upper-year external moots. And hiring for clinics (a) typically happens at the beginning of 1L and (b) is usually handled by upper-year students involved in the those clinics, meaning that your 1L grades wouldn't be a factor.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @easttowest Do you know if there is any advantage (scrutiny-wise) between the two categories? I've applied access and am one year out from being able to apply mature as well (as I was enrolled "full-time" in grad studies while working my first few years full-time, so it delayed that 5 year out of school period). I'm not asking to try and cheat the system in any way--just trying to assess whether I have a better shot this year or next with the mature box checked off. 
    • I'm fairly certain that nothing but press statements have come out. Nothing substantive for colleges and universities to work with.  
    • They're still processing since it seems the bulk of the people Doug Ford consulted with on this are racists and alt-right members.
    • I was accepted around Jan 9/10 and neglected to post until now! cGPA: 3.85 according to OLSAS L2: 3.89 LSAT: 162 ECs: so weak someone told me not to apply to law school 🤷‍♀️ Entirely undecided about what to do about accepting offers as of right now
    • Accepted Dec 19, couldn't believe how early I heard back since I wrote November LSAT! I've no idea what this queue is. cGPA: 3.85 according to OLSAS L2: 3.89 LSAT: 162 LORs: 1 likely very good, 1.. not so great ECs: honestly so bad that someone told me to not even apply to law school, but they include: working part time during school, coaching, an international summer course, and 1 year of school cheerleading .. yikes.    High odds I'm not accepting because of how expensive this will be, but I'm pretty proud of myself anyways, and proud of all the people who worked hard to get in so far!!!      
×