Jump to content
minifrenchie

Crazy to give up Osgoode for Queens?

Recommended Posts

On 1/10/2019 at 5:32 PM, minifrenchie said:

I've been lucky enough to have received offers from Osgoode, Queens, Ottawa and Dalhousie, but I am leaning towards Osgoode or Queens.

I was pretty set on Osgoode but since receiving an offer from Queens yesterday, I am having doubts.

The "prestige" factor is definitely drawing me to Osgoode, as well as the huge class selection. What is less appealing to me is North York, and the cost of housing. It may sound trivial to some but having a nice apartment/housing during law school is very important to me (hellooo mental health!). 

What appeals to me about Queen's is the campus itself, the housing prices, and the community. I especially love the idea of the 25-people cohort. I am a social person and I need a good social circle if I am going to make it through law school. 

Am I crazy to be thinking of going to Queens over Osgoode? Should I still be considering Ottawa and Dalhousie? 

A few things about me:

  • I'm from BC and would love to go back to BC at some point in my career
  • I am not necessarily interested in a Bay Street job 
  • I currently work in politics, therefore I'm leaning towards Public Law but I'd like to keep my options open
  • I am fully bilingual 
  • Smaller classes and a tight-knit community are appealing to me

Did you not apply to UBC / UVic?  What about Alberta or Calgary?  All of those schools would make much more sense than going to Ontario for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t apply to any BC schools. I did my undergrad at UVic and Vancouver is completely unaffordable now. 

+ I’m planning to work on the East coast after graduating, but eventually move back to BC. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, minifrenchie said:

I didn’t apply to any BC schools. I did my undergrad at UVic and Vancouver is completely unaffordable now. 

+ I’m planning to work on the East coast after graduating, but eventually move back to BC. 

Your career is not a vacation.

Working on the east coast after graduating... why on earth would any atlantic firm hire you?  It's a smallish bar.  I know way too many atlantic lawyers who came out west because they either couldn't find jobs, or the jobs they wound here were better paying.

I've posted about his numerous times... law school is not some one off experience - it is phase one of a life-time career.  Your classmates will become your life-long colleagues.  Your professors will be your references for your future jobs.  Your clinic work can become your opening to your entire career.

Go to school where you want to practice.  If you want to explore different parts of the country (a sentiment I whole-heartedly endorse)… take a vacation.  If you plan on winding up in BC in your career... start your career off in BC.  Anything else is just being self-defeating.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Malicious Prosecutor said:

Your career is not a vacation.

Working on the east coast after graduating... why on earth would any atlantic firm hire you?  It's a smallish bar.  I know way too many atlantic lawyers who came out west because they either couldn't find jobs, or the jobs they wound here were better paying.

I've posted about his numerous times... law school is not some one off experience - it is phase one of a life-time career.  Your classmates will become your life-long colleagues.  Your professors will be your references for your future jobs.  Your clinic work can become your opening to your entire career.

Go to school where you want to practice.  If you want to explore different parts of the country (a sentiment I whole-heartedly endorse)… take a vacation.  If you plan on winding up in BC in your career... start your career off in BC.  Anything else is just being self-defeating.

Somewhat disagree... I mean, yes, law school can be that experience... but there are plenty of people who move along using their existing and family connections, or professional connections made well after leaving school, and who don't have their 2L intro to XYZ Law prof writing them reference letters ten years later. Let's not panic the youngins who don't have a favourite prof on speed dial or their Christmas card list. Incidentally, I have a friend who also went to Ottawa, articled out west, and ended up working out on the east cost. Not at all usual, but who knows. Maybe this person has family on both sides of the country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ericontario said:

Somewhat disagree... I mean, yes, law school can be that experience... but there are plenty of people who move along using their existing and family connections, or professional connections made well after leaving school, and who don't have their 2L intro to XYZ Law prof writing them reference letters ten years later. Let's not panic the youngins who don't have a favourite prof on speed dial or their Christmas card list. Incidentally, I have a friend who also went to Ottawa, articled out west, and ended up working out on the east cost. Not at all usual, but who knows. Maybe this person has family on both sides of the country.

I deliberately over-react somewhat on Ls.ca because I keep running into this attitude that law school should be some kind of 3 year vacation to explore a different part of the country.  Sure, there are defensible reasons why someone may go to school in a different part of the country than the one they intend on setting up their career in: maybe they have family, or a significant other, or tuition is cheaper, or it's the only school they could get into.  But too often the only reason seems to be "I'd like to see what living in Ontario/BC/east coast/Quebec is like for a little while".  Which is quite frankly a terrible reason to pick a law school.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Malicious Prosecutor said:

I deliberately over-react somewhat on Ls.ca because I keep running into this attitude that law school should be some kind of 3 year vacation to explore a different part of the country.  Sure, there are defensible reasons why someone may go to school in a different part of the country than the one they intend on setting up their career in: maybe they have family, or a significant other, or tuition is cheaper, or it's the only school they could get into.  But too often the only reason seems to be "I'd like to see what living in Ontario/BC/east coast/Quebec is like for a little while".  Which is quite frankly a terrible reason to pick a law school.

Yep, can't disagree with you there.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Malicious Prosecutor said:

But too often the only reason seems to be "I'd like to see what living in Ontario/BC/east coast/Quebec is like for a little while".  Which is quite frankly a terrible reason to pick a law school.

Heh, and I could hardly disagree more. (Especially if you think it's possible that living in the new place could lead you to want to stay in the new place, thus increasing the size of your target job market.)

If I had one regret about going to Osgoode, it's that I lost the opportunity to see and live in a new part of Canada. I don't think that requires one to look at law school as a vacation. But living in a new place is itself a learning experience and one you will take with you for the rest of your life.  (This is particularly valuable if you have always lived in the same place before.) 

Plus, the career cost of getting that (real living) experience after law school is going to be a lot higher than the cost of getting it during law school.

ETA: I do want to note that for this purpose I would consider Kingston and Toronto to be "different parts of Canada", however absurd that may seem looking at a map.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to Queen’s because I wanted to see what living in Ontario would be like. I was 21 and had very few attachments. It was a perfect time to explore. 

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Outside of Canada, Osgoode does have a much stronger reputation.  Or is it more accurate to say ‘name recognition’....

I was having a beer in Singapore with a few guys from a niche American firm a few weeks ago.  Three Americans, one is from NYU, one from Georgetown, one from Cornell; and a French guy from Sorbonne.  When I said I went to Osgoode, they immediately recognized it, and said it is “the best school in Canada”.  Then we talked a little bit more about Canada.  It is quite clear to me that they only know Osgoode, U of T, and McGill.  These are international people who travel and work around the globe.  They are all in their 40s and have been around for a while.  

I am not saying that Osgoode is better than Queens, not at all.  Just want to point out that, for what it’s worth, when it comes to international recognition, Osgoode wins.

Good luck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/14/2019 at 8:51 PM, Malicious Prosecutor said:

Your career is not a vacation.

Working on the east coast after graduating... why on earth would any atlantic firm hire you?  It's a smallish bar.  I know way too many atlantic lawyers who came out west because they either couldn't find jobs, or the jobs they wound here were better paying.

I've posted about his numerous times... law school is not some one off experience - it is phase one of a life-time career.  Your classmates will become your life-long colleagues.  Your professors will be your references for your future jobs.  Your clinic work can become your opening to your entire career.

Go to school where you want to practice.  If you want to explore different parts of the country (a sentiment I whole-heartedly endorse)… take a vacation.  If you plan on winding up in BC in your career... start your career off in BC.  Anything else is just being self-defeating.

Sorry, bad BC habit... I definitely meant Ontario/Eastern Canada when I said East Coast, not Atlantic Canada.

Edited by minifrenchie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For what it's worth, Queen's beat out Osgoode in hiring at some of the Bay Street firms this OCI cycle. I know of at least two people in my class who turned down Osgoode for Queen's.While you have stated you aren't interested in Bay Street, Queen's is a pretty good school. 

Feel free to PM me if you have any questions about Queen's. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/10/2019 at 7:32 PM, minifrenchie said:

I've been lucky enough to have received offers from Osgoode, Queens, Ottawa and Dalhousie, but I am leaning towards Osgoode or Queens.

I was pretty set on Osgoode but since receiving an offer from Queens yesterday, I am having doubts.

The "prestige" factor is definitely drawing me to Osgoode, as well as the huge class selection. What is less appealing to me is North York, and the cost of housing. It may sound trivial to some but having a nice apartment/housing during law school is very important to me (hellooo mental health!). 

What appeals to me about Queen's is the campus itself, the housing prices, and the community. I especially love the idea of the 25-people cohort. I am a social person and I need a good social circle if I am going to make it through law school. 

Am I crazy to be thinking of going to Queens over Osgoode? Should I still be considering Ottawa and Dalhousie? 

A few things about me:

  • I'm from BC and would love to go back to BC at some point in my career
  • I am not necessarily interested in a Bay Street job 
  • I currently work in politics, therefore I'm leaning towards Public Law but I'd like to keep my options open
  • I am fully bilingual 
  • Smaller classes and a tight-knit community are appealing to me

 

 

100% go to Queens. It's more of a university town and it'll be a better overall social and living experience than Keele & Steeles. There's nothing nearby York except plazas and mechanic shops. Sure you can jump on the subway and get downtown but it's not quite the same vibe compared to lets say U of T which is in the heart of downtown. 

In terms of academics, listen there's only so many schools in Canada as is. Don't get caught up in the "hype" that is Oz/U of T. Queens is a very good school and certainly not Timbuktu. 

I'd also add that Kingston is a smaller town so that gives it a very different atmosphere and one in which you're looking for, but Ottawa/Montreal aren't too far away by train/car if you want to do a weekend trip. 

Also considering you want to work in BC, you'll stand out of the crowd somewhat more having gone to a different part of the country, having had to develop a life totally on your own, etc. That gives you a more interesting story to tell come interview/recruit time, which differentiates you from the standard jazz everyone else will be going on about. 

The only downside here though is that it may be more difficult to compete for positions in BC. Even if you don't want to compete for big firm positions, just the logistics of trying to get a hold of firms, that you can't meet in person, and so forth, it may be a stumbling block compared to someone from BC who wants to stay there. But certainly not a deal breaker. Good luck!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

it depends what you want to do after. I know someone who works for Miller Thompson in downtown Toronto and they said that almost everyone who works there (summer students) were from Osgoode or UofT. So stuff like this is also important to consider. 

I'm not saying that people from Queen's don't get jobs, don't get me wrong. Just relaying what iv'e heard. 

Edited by Maradona
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Maradona. Your friend is mistaken. Check the UV numbers. To say that almost everyone who is hired there for 2L summer is from Osgoode or U of T isn't accurate. Plenty of Queen's students get jobs in Toronto. Let's try not to exaggerate here. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, erinl2 said:

@Maradona. Your friend is mistaken. Check the UV numbers. To say that almost everyone who is hired there for 2L summer is from Osgoode or U of T isn't accurate. Plenty of Queen's students get jobs in Toronto. Let's try not to exaggerate here. 

perhaps, or just maybe in their sector. 

Just Ctrl-Ving what I explicitly heard. 

But thanks for the info!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/17/2019 at 11:14 PM, Maradona said:

it depends what you want to do after. I know someone who works for Miller Thompson in downtown Toronto and they said that almost everyone who works there (summer students) were from Osgoode or UofT. So stuff like this is also important to consider. 

I'm not saying that people from Queen's don't get jobs, don't get me wrong. Just relaying what iv'e heard. 

http://ultravires.ca/2018/11/toronto-2l-hiring-numbers/

This year's UV says Miller Thompson hired 13 students, including 1 from UofT, 3 from Osgoode, 2 from Queen's and 4 from Western.

This year's UV also says that both Queen's and Western placed approximately the same percentage of their class on Bay St as Osgoode (32% vs 31% and 30%).

So don't put much weight in these anecdotal accounts.

 

 

 

Edited by joeyman365

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • "similar wealth to my own what they were getting" Do they also have similar available resources, expenses, accumulated educational debts and personal reasons....... "The primary criterion for receipt of a bursary is financial need. Decisions are made based on a variety of considerations, including available resources, expenses, accumulated educational debt and personal factors, including medical and familial circumstances.  
    • Academic:  Going to echo The Scientist because he usually always explains UOttawa's depth quite well. Our faculty size for the English Section is the largest with 50+ fulltimes, 30 part time (technically, in reality they have job functions non-purely academic but teach courses, since we have non-JD stuff like the National Program for training QC lawyers in commonlaw, a bunch of faculty-run legal clinics/public interest groups intervening in the SCC, etc. ). Research at the faculty is also pretty strong but the university isn't that good at branding itself; e.g. our environmental law faculty has the most depth including the very best career lawyers in Canada and our tech law faculty has the most influential people in Canada for tech-related areas of law. We have people from the foremost torts scholar in Canada (former dean too) and a former Attorney General teaching 1Ls.  Other positive notes: Significant amount of panels, talks, issues and engaging topics. This ranges from the obvious SCC lawyers/Federal Courts cases where a bunch of lawyers go from the court house to panels at UOttawa, many corporate lawyers from Ottawa/Toronto, many specific interest groups (Aboriginal law, feminist law, technology law, federal law, public international law etc)  and many visiting lawyers and academics in Ottawa. The thing about Ottawa is that it functions as a sort of "gathering place" for people from all across Canada/the world so there's lots of big events in town where some people also do things at UO.  We also have a strong "revolving door" of sessional instructors, you will very likely get one per semester. They are usually hits but they are also working people with full jobs and a law graduate degree (e.g. the guy who teaches my course is an awesome first-timer and went to HYS school for an LLM). They are also fantastic people to talk to for career advice.  Downsides: We do not have nearly the depth as Queens or a few schools in advanced corporate law courses; classes can be very full sometimes (50-60 per class is typical).  Community:  Upsides: More mature community than other law schools, like 30% of the class has had career experience or a graduate degree and the average age is like 25-26. While the majority just got out of undergrad, the two groups mix quite well. I've known many people who worked for the Feds or Prov government, worked in Bay Street, did advanced research MSc's, etc. I have honestly learned alot from my classmates and each bring great life experience.  We have lots of student groups; arguably many of the X Field of Law Students Association do not do regular events except panels and bake sales but you will find lots of proactive interest-specific groups/clubs/event organizations. Getting engaged in student life can be very tricky but it requires looking in the right place.  We also got to meet the SCC at an event hosted on their lawn; it was fantastic. The Faculty seems to be the most well-connected in Canada.  Downsides: Overcrowded building; they shuffle a lot of undergrads into a few rooms and they are often in our libraries. Alot of law students were pushing for a ban of undergrads. Civ Law also uses our space and we operate like two parallel worlds. The community is less tied together; there is definitely a weaker sense of community outside of your large group (70-80) or small section  (15-20). Part of this is due to the inept law student society imo and the lack of community-building events of the orientation which did not have any social events. They virtually guarantee that cliques will (and has always) formed just by the nature of how they structured the first week. English Common Law have far few events that bring people together and French Common Law (1/5th the class) are pretty much in their own bubble. Civil Law tends to dominate the libraries though; hard-working but we have basically parallel worlds.  I honestly think this can be fixed by just giving us our own student spaces and lounge areas; offices and rooms for student groups and making it appear more community-friendly. They were supposed to give us a new building a while back but UOttawa instead spent it elsewhere. Taking proactive effort in the first 3 weeks with community-making social events and breaking the barriers that develop is also something the admin can do.   Other Notes: It can feel like "Going to Work" in some sense; our school is probably less student-focused given the school plays a significant functional role for the legal profession, Canada, and specific interests/issues. For example there was an event honoring a great Ontario judge attended by many lawyers and well-to-do judiciary members including the SCC right beside my evening class; it was definitely open to all students though.
    • Generally speaking, of a 4-year degree, U of C considers only the last 2 years-worth of courses (last 60 of a total of 120 credits). Regardless of whether they transfer or not.  If you went to a university outside of Canada, then you will want to contact admissions with your specifics.
    • Can anyone help? I understand that your last 60 credits are considered for your gpa calculation but what If you go to a different university than UofA? do all the degree level classes count towards gpa? Even if they don't transfer to the Uofa? 
    • Can anyone help? I understand that your last 60 credits are considered for your gpa calculation but what If you go to a different university than Calgary? do all the degree level classes count towards gpa? Even if they don't transfer to the UofC? 
×