Jump to content

Discussions on Reddit?

Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, ghoulzrulez said:

I think individuals in the legal profession like to imagine that they embody the qualities of civility and dignity … not to say that some lawyers aren't a bunch of [insert choice synonym for "terrible people"], but rather, that they might be more likely to present their offensive or rude positions in a more agreeable way. Maybe that's why I see less derogatory slurs on LS.ca than Reddit? Or perhaps individuals on LS.ca are just worried that one day the Law Society will uncover their identity? 

I think most people on this site tend to express ideas, even on difficult topics, fairly reasonably at least the first time. Reddit, not so much (at least in discussions about things like games, maybe political discussions are hotbeds of reasoned discourse by comparison...:twisted:). Understandably, as discussions proceed, some people get angrier. Unfortunately, some posters - left-wing and right-wing both - have a tendency to start at outrage and ridicule, immediately accusing others and escalating things so that, even if they're not the direct cause, they indirectly cause threads to be locked. And we all probably have hot-button issues or bad days - I tend to react poorly to people asking questions before Googling, perhaps more harshly than deserved... :rolleyes:

I try (emphasis try, not always!) to take the view, even if someone has mala fides, they may nonetheless be correct on a point or have useful or interesting information or be open to persuasion. Contrariwise, someone with bona fides may just be wrong or express things one agrees with in an offensive way. And as others have said, one often learns more by paying attention to arguments one disagrees with than with ones one is predisposed to agree with.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, LosingMoses said:

Personally I find Reddit a lot more convenient to use, particularly because of the upvote/downvote system (allows one to easily identify the best answer to a question and ignore misleading answers - very important for contentious topics such as law school admissions). 


But I'm not sure an answer with a lot of down votes would necessarily be misleading. Just as a view with a lot of up votes wouldn't necessarily be correct. Crowdsourcing what you will pay attention to in this manner runs the risk of seriously skewing your perspective.

  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've seen, this site is more useful, for the reasons others have mentioned. Most of the content on Reddit is US-centric, although there is LawCanada.

In case anyone's interested, I've come across three opinion pieces on the value of Reddit for lawyers: positive, positive, and negative. One positive attribute is a subreddit exclusively for lawyers, which requires proof of licensure to join. It's US-centric but it's open to Canadian lawyers.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

www.autoadmit.com is an uncensored, unmoderated law school discussion forum.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Recent Posts

    • If you work full time every summer of undergrad, even at minimum wage you're at $8,960 before taxes. Sprinkle in some part time at minimum wage during studies and an entrance bursary or two and you can make out ok for yourself.  Now consider I did labor (construction) with nearly unlimited overtime and there you are with no student loans and a car. I don't think its that bold to assume that, a minority of students graduate without debt, but are not quite vocal about it.  I appreciate this point, I think I took the work ideal a little too literally.  In the context of this thread that would be ideal you are correct. 
    • No ideal situation? Getting an acceptance anytime before May seems pretty damn ideal. You seem to be making some pretty bold assumptions, especially from a place where not many students are (or maybe I'm truly blind to the type of kids that end up at law school). Being able to move back to your parents place (maybe not so bold an assumption, but definitely not a reality for everyone), a car and no student loans... Cmon dude.
    • @Another Hutzmade solid points in another post that has relevance here. It's best to go to law school in the same province where you want to work.  This is because laws do differ between provinces, so you generally want to learn the law you'll practice, and it's far easier to obtain articles when living in the city you want to work in.  It's easier to attend events, make connections, etc. I'm no employer but seeing UVic undergrad + UVic law school is not unusual.  There's a bunch of UBC undergrad + UBC law school resumes out there.  Having a unique educational history may be an interesting topic of conversation or possibly relevant to the work it self, but it's not necessary.  People choose schools for many different reasons, e.g. family, friends, opportunities, having roots, specialization, etc.   "Mixing it up a bit and trying something new" is all well and good as long as it doesn't make it significantly harder to get to where you want to go. .
    • You both were insulting and rude from the beginning. Implying that us wanting to make an informed decision and not rush into anything means we would not succeed in law or law school is an insult.  This thread is going so off topic. It was about trying to see who hadn't had their file evaluated at Western. Lets stick to that. If you want to have your debate on whether you can move cities to attend law school in a week, make your own thread. 
    • Biglaw's problem (well, not exclusively big law), especially as a more junior associate, is always a general lack of predictability. Client decides late Thursday they want random request by Monday. Guess who has to rearrange weekend plans to get it done? (Hint, usually not the higher ups on the file). I think Ottawa has a good number of gov't and tribunal options. Obviously depends on your area of interest. Not too sure on in house, may be somewhat more limited with lots of larger companies being based out of the GTA. 
  • Create New...