Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Recommended Posts

For those who were just accepted to UBC and had never attended the school before: 

Did any of you receive the SSC password required to register a CWL account? And what kinds of information related to law school admissions (accepting offer, paying deposit) are available on the student portal? 

I only got a student number in my admission letter. 

Edited by FlashHook

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those who have accepted an payed deposit, it says they will contact you once the acceptance is processed. Anyone had their acceptance finalized yet? Do you get an email or what?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Johnappleseed said:

For those who have accepted an payed deposit, it says they will contact you once the acceptance is processed. Anyone had their acceptance finalized yet? Do you get an email or what?

Yeah, I just got the email this morning confirming my acceptance of the offer as well as containing some info about tuition, orientation, etc. For reference, I accepted the offer on Friday Nov 30

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

55 minutes ago, Mav said:

Yeah, I just got the email this morning confirming my acceptance of the offer as well as containing some info about tuition, orientation, etc. For reference, I accepted the offer on Friday Nov 30

 

47 minutes ago, Johnappleseed said:

Just got the email as well. Also accepted on Friday. See you in September :)

Do you guys mind sharing stats?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/4/2018 at 8:45 AM, Johnappleseed said:

For those who have accepted an payed deposit, it says they will contact you once the acceptance is processed. Anyone had their acceptance finalized yet? Do you get an email or what?

Were you able to see your deposit charges on your SSC account? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, FlashHook said:

Were you able to see your deposit charges on your SSC account? 

Yeah it was under the finances section and it said I had $600 due

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Huge difference between demands inherent to the job, demands inherent to realistic but difficult (for many) demands of the firm, and demands inherent to unrealistic demands of the firm. Especially when employer demands worsen the service delivered to the client, either or both in terms of quality or fees charged. Let me ask this: if a client is paying for e.g. litigation counsel for a 2-week trial, should they reasonably expect that the lawyer is dealing with that trial solely, getting enough sleep, not distracted by other work matters, for instance, and that the firm should support that? Or should the lawyer be expected to, on evenings and weekends and during lunch, instead of recharging and preparing for the next part of the trial, be working on other matters? A Toronto boutique example albeit from years ago, a senior lawyer at my firm had a weeklong trial adjourned at the last minute (opposing counsel had a sudden health issue or something). He was able to take a sudden weeklong vacation, because the trial had been the sole thing he was preparing for that week. Now, that's litigation, not more solicitor-sided work, and not NYC. But paying large amounts for tired lawyers working more slowly than they would if well-rested may be good for the employer, but it's not good for the lawyers or the client. Everyone has times when they have to work long hours without rest, be it an emergency motion or deal or whatever. But that should be when necessary due to the demands of the situation, not the demands of the employer. Of course, my views on this may relate to why I'm not practising law FT anymore...  EDIT: and to try to relate to the topic of this thread, let's say a woman lawyer is being very ethical and is saying, hey, I have a trial going on now, I need to focus on this. Will she be more likely to be considered a less-hard-working prima donna, as compared to a man, who's going to be seen as focusing on the job? Or will they both be seen as slackers?
    • in Queens and Western most likely OZ too
    • It is my understanding that they do consider MA grades. Good luck!
×