Jump to content
tonyk8260411

Housing for family of 3

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi all 

 I am a mature student with a wife and a primary school child altogether moving to Edmonton from BC. 

My first and foremost concern, I need to rent a half decent place. I’ve been researching online and it’s very very hard  for me to kind of envision what those areas are like, having never been to Edmonton myself.

1. Sunset valley 

2. Ellerslie 

3. Oliver (cost is high though for a decent condo) but I am concerned of safety issues since downtown/Uni area I heard is quite old ? 

4. Uni residence at Michener park 

5. Strathcona 

It would be great if anyone could offer any insights as to whether these places are livable in terms of the town itself and travel distance to the university. 

Thanks !!!

 

 

 

Edited by tonyk8260411

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Hey Tony,

The answer will depend on how much driving you are prepared to do, and what your parking situation will be. If you've got a family and are comfortable commuting 30+ mins each way to campus, Ellerslie is probably the best choice (nice suburban area). If you want to be close (or transit accessible) then McKernan, Belgravia are great choices. Probably Oliver is the next best choice, as it's got easy access to the university while still having some good schools within walking distance. Strathcona is probably a poor choice for a child - it's right around the big party area of Edmonton (Whyte Ave) and I'm not sure if they have a good elementary school around there. 

 

Some other choices with easy transit would be: Westmount, Inglewood, Woodcroft, Bonnie Doon, even Sherbrooke. 

 

Probably the best choice in my opinion would be Malmo or Lendrum. They are family oriented neighbourhoods, but close enough to the uni, and the LRT stop at Southgate mall is easily accessible. Plus, you could get a house in these areas rather than a condo. 

 

Check out the LRT routes and driving times to make your choice a bit clearer. I'm big on transit because driving around the university area is a nightmare and parking is EXPENSIVE and not always guaranteed. I know some people manage it though. 

Edited by BigScienceCertificate
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

.

Edited by DJ89

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

To give you some perspective, I have lived in the Ellerslie area for a few years now, and I'll give a bit of an idea what I've found it's like to live there. Hope this helps!

Transit

It is 45 minutes transit to the UofA if you do not have to wait at all at the bus or train. An hour is usually safe to budget for transit time. After 9pm-ish and before 6am, the busses are less frequent; they can be 30 minutes to an hour apart. As for driving, it is exactly 30 minutes to the UofA if traffic is good.

Safety

I have never felt unsafe in the Ellerslie area. I once had to take a longer walk home (~10 minutes) from a night class, but I felt very safe since most of the paths are lit, and there are not a lot of partiers.

For Kids

There are a lot of walking paths and most of them are lit. There are also a lot of playgrounds. In my area, there is one 5-minutes walking away and two more 15-20-minutes walking away. There are also a decent amount of local schools that are easily-accessible by transit. Also, the area seems to be primarily young families.

I grew up in the countryside, so the biggest plus of this area is how quiet it is. At night, it is practically silent, and it is still relatively quiet during the day. A lot of people seem to trust the area enough to let their kids walk themselves to and from school, let their kids leave bikes in the yard, leave their garage doors open for a while, and leave the keys in their vehicles.

Edit: If you're also looking to buy a place, it might be helpful to look into the planned LRT expansions since that can affect property values.

Edited by Elise
Edit: adding more info about future LRT expansions

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Salut! J'ai oeuvré en droit des technologies ces dernières années au sein d'un grand cabinet et je n'ai pas de maîtrise liée au sujet. Tu n'as pas besoin de maîtrise pour pratiquer dans le domaine, toutefois, il est certain que ça ne te fera pas de tort si c'est vraiment un sujet qui t'intéresse. Ceci dit, une maîtrise est loin de te garantir un emploi dans le domaine, et même comme avocat dans un moyen a grand cabinet en général. Mon expérience est malheureusement limitée aux grands cabinets pour ce qui est de la question des technologies de l'information, mais je suis certain que des petits à moyens cabinets doivent y toucher. C'est peut-être des recherches à effectuées de ton côté. Mon seul autre commentaire est de faire attention de ne pas trop te restreindre dans ta recherche d'emploi aussi. Les cabinets qui oeuvrent dans ce domaine peuvent desfois avoir qu'un ou deux avocats qui touchent au sujet, et donc si tu exprimes trop fortement ton intérêt de ne travailler que dans ce domaine, il est possible qu'il n'y ait pas assez de volume pour justifier la décision d'embauche d'un(e) avocat(e) à temps plein qui ne toucheras qu'aux technologies de l'information. Il est aussi d'habitude prudent/recommandé d'essayer plusieurs pratiques avant de ne trop s'avancer sur le sujet qui peut t'intéresser. Les études et la pratique sont deux mondes assez différents. Ce qui nous intéresse en théorie, n'est pas toujours le cas en pratique, quand on commence à vivre le "day to day" de l'affaire. J'espère que ça l'a pu aider! N'hésites pas si tu as d'autres questions ou commentaires.
    • Your reasons for going to law?  
    • So it will be infinitely more difficult for you, but its possible especially given your circumstances. It'll depend on your L2 and your LSAT. If you have a redeemable L2 and a great LSAT score you'll have a standing chance at Western, Queens, and potentially Osgoode. Western and Queens have "access" categories that you can apply under but you'll have to look into them and whether or not you can still apply under that category or under the mature category. Osgoode has a Part B section as part of their personal statement where you can explain the extenuating factors that impacted your academic performance. Osgoode, in particular, can be very holistic in their evaluation of candidates. For reference, I had a CGPA of 3.0/4.0, L2 3.6/4.0 and an LSAT of 165 and got accepted to my top choice. I also had deaths in my immediate family and some other additional well-documented personal circumstances that affected my academic performance, so I get where you're coming from.  
    • Yeah, you have to keep Browne and Dunn in mind. That's another reason why you need your checklist about what every fact you need to prove your case is. If anyone says something that contradicts one of those, you need to challenge them, and have the documents ready if they're lying/shading...
    • Hi, I am wondering if I am eligible for ANY law school admission.  K, my GPA is super law. It is only 2.86. My mom passed away when I was in the 2nd year of the school and I couldn't really focus on anything for years. However, I recently obtained my CPA designation in 2017 and have 5-year working experience as a business consultant and an auditor. NO LSAT yet. My question is: Is it possible for a low GPA student to qualify for law school admission? Thanks in advance.
×