Jump to content
Eeee

The same 5 people talking in threads

Recommended Posts

Is like kudzu. It would be 'useful' if there was like a shadowban where if you reply more than say three times to a thread then your posts can only be seen by people who have also replied >3 times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or this forum just needs a chatroom for people to have their pissing contests.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really see anything wrong with people commenting repeatedly on the same thread... what good would be served by limiting the number of replies?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly, I just see it interfering with people's ability to develop their thoughts through dialogue...

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or add things that they only think of after already posting a few times.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Few negative and arrogant people who post 24*7 making me feel like leaving this forum forever. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's an "ignore user" feature - does that help? I've never used it, because I'm a very fast reader, and even someone I despise may nonetheless say something interesting or useful (just as someone I like may make bad posts...) - I think there's far too much ignoring of those one disagrees with in today's world, making compromise difficult if not impossible (politically or otherwise).

Of course, it's possible that those to whom this advice is directed have already enabled this feature with respect to me or others... :rolleyes:

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, Demander said:

Or add things that they only think of after already posting a few times.

hilarious you posted an additional two times, that had to be on purpose, lol! noice!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, epeeist said:

There's an "ignore user" feature - does that help? I've never used it, because I'm a very fast reader, and even someone I despise may nonetheless say something interesting or useful (just as someone I like may make bad posts...) - I think there's far too much ignoring of those one disagrees with in today's world, making compromise difficult if not impossible (politically or otherwise).

Of course, it's possible that those to whom this advice is directed have already enabled this feature with respect to me or others... :rolleyes:

I use the ignore feature. I use it sparingly, and not just because someone disagrees with me. It's more when someone posts dozens of times over the span of a few days and I'd like to read the site without watching the same dead horse being unceremoniously beaten across the all activity page. I agree that it's better to read dissenting views. But when they've repeatedly made their views known on a topic, it's nice to have a break from those views without leaving the site altogether. Also, you typically see the person's views quoted in other posters' responses. And I usually end up reading their posts anyway. But when someone goes on an opinion rampage, I like having the freedom to read or not.

Edited by realpseudonym
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, epeeist said:

There's an "ignore user" feature - does that help? I've never used it, because I'm a very fast reader, and even someone I despise may nonetheless say something interesting or useful (just as someone I like may make bad posts...) - I think there's far too much ignoring of those one disagrees with in today's world, making compromise difficult if not impossible (politically or otherwise).

Of course, it's possible that those to whom this advice is directed have already enabled this feature with respect to me or others... :rolleyes:

Didn't know this feature exist. I should definitely use it. I am all up for debate if it is productive and constructive, I actually prefer to know other views than my own.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 4/22/2018 at 4:09 PM, epeeist said:

- I think there's far too much ignoring of those one disagrees with in today's world, making compromise difficult if not impossible (politically or otherwise).

 

It's not about disagreement. The current vogue in megaposting appears to be writing tangential, autobiographical screeds that have really nothing to do with providing accurate, helpful advice to the OP and everything to do with self-aggrandizement and tweaking of other megaposters.

Edited by Eeee
  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/22/2018 at 11:42 AM, Jaggers said:

This is why Omph left.

Well, that and the continued sexism, homophobia and various "OMG HOW DARE YOU SUGGEST THAT I AM THAT" responses when she tried to rephrase the topic for the poster to understand why something may not have been too kosher to say.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

It'd be useful if posters in this thread would come out and say specifically who they're talking about.

Edited by chaboywb
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, chaboywb said:

It'd be useful if posters in this thread would come out and say specifically who they're talking about.

Me, prov, MB, etc. It’s interestingly timed, since this may be the point in time where we’ve gone at each other the least since I joined. @providence and I in particular have gotten a lot better at not talking past each other and understanding the others points (my idiocy last night excluded).

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Eeee said:

It's not about disagreement. The current vogue in megaposting appears to be writing tangential, autobiographical screeds that have really nothing to do with providing accurate, helpful advice to the OP and everything to do with self-aggrandizement and tweaking of other megaposters.

Well, my post in this thread was the first one with specific, accurate, helpful advice using already-existing (not suggested) features of the board... :uriel:

Oops, was that self-aggrandizing and tweaking other posters? :twisted:

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, BlockedQuebecois said:

Me, prov, MB, etc. It’s interestingly timed, since this may be the point in time where we’ve gone at each other the least since I joined. @providence and I in particular have gotten a lot better at not talking past each other and understanding the others points (my idiocy last night excluded).

Your multi-post argument over "it's funny" was basically a greatest hits/reunion tour :). But it's good to get the band back together sometimes.

I'm not sure that it's just the same five people. For however long I've been reading the forum (years? I think years. I was a lurker before I started posting), there have been people who have stopped by and argued like their lives depended on it for a few threads. Most recently, it was the guy who thought Osgoode was overrun by SJWs and that the hiring system was fundamentally unfair. But I guess those posters usually flame out and leave, or contribute in a more sustainable way.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'll echo everything that McSweeney says and add that's a pretty rough mobile home park too. I had a friend that lived in the Boardwalk apartments nearby. The cops would show up to the mobile home park regularly and there were definitely a few meth heads living there. You could do a lot better. 
    • B2: 4.24 / 4.3 LSAT: 156 one write this past September. Looking for some feedback on if my chances of receiving an offer are strong or not.  I do not have a strong Saskatchewan connection.  To complicate matters though: I did disclose in the application under post-secondary disciplinary actions that I received one non-academic warning. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.    
    • As long as you pay and submit before the November 1st deadline, you have met the requirement for Ontario schools and will not be considered late. My transcript request took 2 business days after submitting to go through and show up on OLSAS (just for reference), but even if it does show up after the deadline, you have still met the requirements as long as you pay and submit before Nov 1st! So don't worry  Under FAQs on OLSAS it will confirm this!
    • Transcripts from an Ontario University or College Online Transcript Request If you attended or are currently enrolled at an Ontario university or college, you must request your transcript through your online application. By completing the online transcript request and forwarding the appropriate fees, you authorize the OUAC to arrange for your official transcripts to be sent to OLSAS; you do not need to contact the Registrar’s Office directly. You can access this section in your online application by selecting “Transcripts”. OLSAS must receive your online transcript request by the appropriate deadlines to satisfy the transcript deadline requirement. Transcripts requested when you apply online will not include the current year’s results.
    • Ummmmmm, I was under the impression that the Nov 1 deadline for transcripts is only for non-Ontario universities? 
×