Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
flawyer

Letter of Reference Question

Recommended Posts

3. Letters of Reference

At least two letters of reference are required and we strongly recommend that at least one be an academic reference.  Letters of reference are confidential and must be submitted by the referee directly to OLSAS. You should select referees who have extensive personal knowledge of you and can make statements concerning your:

  • Character
  • Personal qualities
  • Academic capabilities
  • Performance in an employment and/or volunteer capacity
  • Special circumstances, if applicable

    MY QUESTION:

Osgoode asks for a minimum of two letters of reference, with the STRONG recommendation that one be an academic reference. I have been out of undergrad for several years, and while I can probably get a few professors to write something, its been long enough that they won't be glowing or very detailed. I can get very strong recommendations from my supervisor, manager and the the owner of the company I work for also (Not directly related to law, more skills based). However, I am wondering if I could use a 3rd cousin, who is a very prominent lawyer in Ontario, and former professor (at osgoode) for an additional recommendation, are family/relative references not allowed? Will it look bad? Does it matter either way? And yes we have the same last name.

Edited by flawyer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it would seem odd to use a cousin as a reference, as it doesn’t appear you worked under them or took classes with them, so I think it might come off weird. 

Also, one of my friends (who applied last year to Osgoode) did not give any academic references initially, and was contacted by Osgoode later in the cycle and requested to add an academic reference. Just an idea that it may actually be necessary, even if it just says ‘recommended’. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see your cousin adding anything if you didn't take their class. If you had it would probably be okay (admissions committee probably wouldn't jump to "family member" if you were one of their students) but what are they going to provide other than a character reference? I have a feeling the admissions committee would see right through that.

Just find the one professor who you think remembers you the most and ask them. Remind them of what you did in their course - I even attached a paper that I had received a high mark on. Once you say you're applying to law school they'll understand. Profs write reference letters all the time, they know the drill and how hard it is to find suitable references. If you don't feel it'll be a strong reference list it as your third reference on OLSAS and use your employers for the other two. That way the admissions committee will definitely read the two letters you're confident about and will check the third one just to see if you have an academic reference, which is apparently a requirement.

 

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • It's funny how the courses that don't seem like there will be much too them can turn out to be the tricky ones, isn't it? "Legal Research and Writing" and "Law, Legislation, and Policy" are the two courses I'm struggling with right now. They just sounded like fluff at first, but the problem is that they're skills--based, and it's harder to develop skills quickly than it is to just learn a bunch of facts or even abstract concepts. I thought contracts would be hardest, because I had no interest in it and absolutely zero commercial/business sense, but it is turning out to be the easiest because the concepts are fairly discrete, easy to define, and seem to be building on each other logically. Sorry I don't have an actual answer, @capitalttruth; just commiserating! Only thing I can think of, if your course is like our LRW (and it sounds like it), is that WestLaw and QuickLaw seem to have some tutorial material built right into them. Perhaps if you find the right self-guided material, you can learn the material in your own way. -GM
    • Contracts and property is fundamental to almost everything from family to construction to commercial law to employment. 
    • Are you able to continue with the courses at York, perhaps working toward a second degree? If you can assemble two good years in a row, there are schools in Canada that would only look at those 2 years - although you would have to double-check that those schools will accept marks from a second degree. Unfortunately, I think adding some more time to your academic record is likely to be your only shot. I don't think any Canadian schools are likely to accept a C+ average, and you will need to add to show that your straight-A semester was not a fluke. Best of luck in figuring out your journey, -GM
    • Contracts was my favourite class too, so I switched my focus from Crim to corporate. I always wanted to do lit, and commercial litigation is a lot of arguing about contracts. 

×
×
  • Create New...