Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
jaygee

Clerkship 2018

Recommended Posts

Just thought I'd make this since there is no thread up for this year's cycle.

I'll kick things off: does anyone have any data on movement at the BC courts yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People have started receiving interview offers (BC). If I read the application process document correctly, all applicants should hear back by February 16.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, AuriandFoxen said:

Offers from Edmonton are out. Anyone hear from Calgary?

Are all the Edmonton courts done? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, inespere said:

Are all the Edmonton courts done? 

I believe Edmonton and Calgary are both done.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/31/2018 at 12:11 AM, freshprince04 said:

How about FC and FCA?

Got a call for an interview from the FC today! But was told that's unusually early and bulk of interviews will be done in mid-late february. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hello hello dears.

Anyone got a call from the SCC? Please let people know when the calls start :) (and I will do the same, if I get one!)

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, legalqueen said:

hello hello dears.

Anyone got a call from the SCC? Please let people know when the calls start  (and I will do the same, if I get one!)

Thanks

In the past, for applicants who are granted SCC interviews, the Court has sent emails with a chart that sets out your interview schedule. I would expect emails to go out late this week, or early next week. But that is a guesstimation based on past years. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2018-02-05 at 3:15 PM, StandardOfReview said:

In the past, for applicants who are granted SCC interviews, the Court has sent emails with a chart that sets out your interview schedule. I would expect emails to go out late this week, or early next week. But that is a guesstimation based on past years. 

I think last year the first mention of interview offers was closer to family day - like feb 15-17 onwards. 

but i second legalqueen - please post if/when you get one! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Notorious said:

Yes, but SCC interviews last year were the week of March 6.

shoot, yes you're right. I missed interviews are a week earlier this year!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On February 5, 2018 at 12:00 PM, Rose123 said:

Any update on FC and FCA?

I know interviews are being conducted at the FC and that calls are going out for FCA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for taking the time to answer my previous question. I may be applying this cycle and have a question with regards to the Sketch part of the application. When I previously applied to Law School I added every little volunteer/extracurricular from the time I entered University. For simplicity purposes, I wanted to retain only the last 3-4 years of relevant experience. Would this be a problem for an individual that had more sketch items in a previous application 1-2 years ago? For example some activities are not included at all whereas they were on a previous application?  And just for the sake of knowing I guess, would you have access to and look back at a previous application if you were assessing a candidate?  
    • No, I think the bias is good because it makes whiny conservatives like you fill your diaper. Your first thought on hearing the Prime Minister did something racist was run to bump an old thread to try and score points for your “team”, because to you the racism isn’t really the issue, it’s just an opportunity to poke a lib in the eye.
    • I don't think that people are necessarily laughing at the essence of what you are saying.  What you are saying isn't completely crazy.  The pace at which you are suggesting this will all happen is likely, in part, what they are doubting.  The reactions may also be partly attributed to the fact that you haven't (I don't think?) actually practiced law at this point. I just don't think the legal profession will be completely revolutionized as imminently as your comments suggest.  While I (and probably others) can appreciate arguments that computers will replace certain functions currently done by humans and that some of Ryerson's tech-forward training could be helpful (if well executed), I think it will take time to get there.  While I do appreciate the need for lawyers to have more technical skills and to better integrate technology into law schools (whatever that means...I'm old), I don't understand how this translates to what seems to be your critique of the substance of law school (i.e. what is taught not the way it is taught).  I do think that law school, especially 1L, should continue to include the case reading, making legal arguments, etc. that you seem to criticize, both because I can't imagine a scenario where humans interacting with AI technology don't need a baseline level of knowledge of the law and because I don't think these changes are going to come all that quickly.  It is also pretty absurd to claim that summaries from 2003 are "the same".  75% the same?  Sure.  But actually the same?  Doubtful.  Even if they were "the same", that doesn't demonstrate that law school curricula are dated or make them irrelevant.  If that is the current state of the law, then that is the current state of the law.
    • Agreed. Also I’m at UBC (where OP also seems to attend) and I’ve had several recruiters at big firms tell me, unprompted, that we have a great CSO that understands exactly what the firms want. Probably since our CSO people have worked at large firms.  Just wanted to add that since I don’t think it’s helpful for OP to go down the path of thinking an incompetent CSO was his or her issue. 
    • Okay since I am getting laughs here. Fine, here's a fairly "primitive" model of how natural language processing algorithm can be used. Read this, its an open-source Python library designed for building legal tech software: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3192101 This is an easier to digest thing describing how AI is reshaping law.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3381798
×
×
  • Create New...