Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
notcowgirl

Current Canadian Law School Rankings??

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, theycancallyouhoju said:

Harvard.

Yeah 2017 really confirmed that it’s an age thing. 

 

I was gonna say Harvard. 

I was once briefly head over heels for a guy at Harvard med school before I realized he was a jerk. I still have my Harvard med hoodie though...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, providence said:

You tried to impress women with your law school so you could have casual sex but ended up with a serious relationship? Or you tried to impress women with your law school to get a serious relationship and didn’t end up with one?:)

The ladyfriend and I were already in deep before law school. But I can assure you she was not impressed before or after and remains resolute in her conviction that law school and firms must simply be silly. Which, to be fair...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, theycancallyouhoju said:

The ladyfriend and I were already in deep before law school. But I can assure you she was not impressed before or after and remains resolute in her conviction that law school and firms must simply be silly. Which, to be fair...

So you did it right then :)

I’m also guessing you didn’t meet her on Tinder or the equivalent.

Edited by providence
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, providence said:

So you did it right then 

I’m also guessing you didn’t meet her on Tinder or the equivalent.

Of the many blessings, having gotten locked down before my desperation exceeded my shame by enough to install Tinder has to be near the top. I literally cannot imagine how I wold have spoken to a woman on an app. “Hi. I only have your appearances to go on, but let me know if you’d like us to pretend I think it’s really cool you like hiking and tapas bars for the first few messages.” 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to hijack the thread, or something, but it’s very strange being right smack in the middle of Generation Tinder without knowing which swipe means what. The whole thing makes no sense to me. Guys who I watched, like me, never be approached by a woman ever tell me of 2-3 dates a week. As someone whose entire theory of interesting a woman was discussion- and food-based, I don’t think Tinder would have gone well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, theycancallyouhoju said:

Of the many blessings, having gotten locked down before my desperation exceeded my shame by enough to install Tinder has to be near the top. I literally cannot imagine how I wold have spoken to a woman on an app. “Hi. I only have your appearances to go on, but let me know if you’d like us to pretend I think it’s really cool you like hiking and tapas bars for the first few messages.” 

I tried internet dating for a while but met my fiancé the traditional way - at a social event where he asked my friend to introduce us.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Other opening line theories:

- “I see you too fear facing the void alone.”

- “Would you prefer we continue my objectifying you over dinner or drinks?”

- “Wait, so you like movies too??”

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked her if she was impressed I went to UT and work as a shmancy NY corporate attorney. "Sure. In the sense that I used to think only smart people can do those things and now my impression has changed."

I have a strong support network. 

Edited by theycancallyouhoju
  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, theycancallyouhoju said:

Other opening line theories:

- “I see you too fear facing the void alone.”

- “Would you prefer we continue my objectifying you over dinner or drinks?”

- “Wait, so you like movies too??”

I think "I'm in law school! I go to U of T!" is supposed to replace all of those. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, providence said:

I think "I'm in law school! I go to U of T!" is supposed to replace all of those. 

If only I'd known women were so intrigued by significant debt, high stress levels and stories beginning "oh this is interesting" that are in no way interesting. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, providence said:

It’s not expensive? :huh: Then how come I can’t afford it?

I suppose the professional LLMs can still be expensive, but even UofT (for the regular LLM), last I saw, was just over $10,000 and other schools are much, much cheaper.  You can also whittle that down.  When I did my LLM (not necessarily at UofT), I taught an undergrad class, which paid about $7,000.  I also did probably $8,000 worth of research work with my thesis supervisor and another prof and did a $5000 contract for government that my thesis supervisor helped me get.  That didn't seem to be out of line with what my colleagues were doing financially, although maybe a little bit on the high side.  I had a generous scholarship specific to my subject area, but I would say that a good proportion of my fellow LLM students had scholarships that were around 1/3 of tuition.  But I was straight out of articling.  From what I gather, you have more mouths to feed than I did :).  

Edited by ProfReader
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, harveyspecter993 said:

Even the banks rank schools. There was a thread last year about RBC having an A and B list of law schools.

Last I heard this impacts the credit the banks will provide.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Diplock said:

There is no definitive ranking of Canadian law schools, from "best" to "worst" and such rankings that do exist are created only because people demand them out of ignorance, and then they are based on criteria that almost no one in real legal practice could ever endorse. The "best" law school for you will be highly dependent on your circumstances. And if you want to start a discussion about that decision-making process, here, people will generally be quite helpful. But if you're looking for an American-style list, it isn't going to happen.

A rare miss for Diplock.   In fact, this site has previously been host to the definitive, and methodologically rigorous, ranking of Ontario law schools:  

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The most prestigious law school is wherever I attended. I can't actually read my degree because it is in latin but that means it is extra prestigious. The worst school is wherever I was either not accepted or some poster that I dislike attends.

Given that I was accepted everywhere I applied (aka, that 1 school), there are no bad schools.

I would much rather rank gluten-free bread. Or eclectic folktronica albums. Or best weed store names. or legal puns.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, harveyspecter993 said:

Even the banks rank schools. There was a thread last year about RBC having an A and B list of law schools.

All the sarcasm in this thread aside, I don’t believe anyone here thinks that all law schools are in all ways equal. The push back is because it wouldn’t be clear how to make a generally useful ranking, in most respects the schools are close enough to not make the differences obvious, and unlike in the U.S., factors other than ranking will play a more significant role in determining where a prospective student should go.

The last one is the clearest. If you want to be a criminal lawyer in Dallas or a biglaw lawyer in NY, going to Harvard is a pretty good choice. If you want to be a criminal lawyer in Vancouver, it’s not really all that clear that UT - even assuming it is the most prestige-y of the prestigious - is a smart choice. Location plays a bigger role in deterring where the consensus would say you ought to go.

It makes much better sense in Canada to ask ‘given that I’d like to/am open to working in x[, and y], in practice area z, where should I go?’ The second piece will help inform pricing risk - e.g. if you only want to be a corporate lawyer, then the UT/Osgoode debate takes a very different tone than if you want to be a family lawyer. 

Finally, board members have very different opinions on what the value of a law school is. I’m a big believer that every law student is 24+ years old, can learn law school topics on their own/Canadian law profs are all certainly good enough, and therefore applicants shouldn’t think too much about ‘quality of instruction’. On top of that, you’re going to do 98% of your learning on the job, so who cares. To my mind, the point of a law school is to be yet one more entry on your job applicant profile. In other words, start figuring out what jobs you might want before you agree to pay tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars for the product that is a law degree, and pick the law school that gives you the best product for buying the job you want. But - maybe I only think that becaus I’m a solicitor admitted in NY, a body of law for which I had exactly zero law school prep and yet seem to do just as fine as my colleagues from the States. Other people think the best thing you can get out of law school is practical experience and knowledge and thus someone with a crim law interest should seek out the best crim law clinic work, for example.

Tl;dr Go to Harvard. 

Edited by theycancallyouhoju
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, theycancallyouhoju said:

All the sarcasm in this thread aside, I don’t believe anyone here thinks that all law schools are in all ways equal. The push back is because it wouldn’t be clear how to make a generally useful ranking

I figured it was just Canadian politeness.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, harveyspecter993 said:

I figured it was just Canadian politeness.

Using comparatively few criteria it would be possible to create a useful ranking system. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, harveyspecter993 said:

I figured it was just Canadian politeness.

Quite the opposite, at least in my case. I wouldn't say Canadian law schools are similarly prestigious or elite; I would say they all lack prestige and eliteness in roughly equal measure. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • Hi GM! Get back to that Contracts outline! I'm pretty solidly centre-left/left leaning (even had a friend in Osgoode jokingly say that I might be "too left" for law), but still had some reservations that I wouldn't be "left enough" for UVic. Yes, I agree it is pretty overtly left-wing/social-justice oriented. It can be a bit overwhelming. I think it's worth bearing in mind that UVic is, in general, known for being a very left-leaning school as a whole. I personally really like the fact that the school makes clear, genuine efforts to make space for traditionally marginalized voices. At the same time, I completely understand why one would feel like the progressiveness is "intense and impenetrable." Zoom school sucks for getting to know people. In an online class setting, we only get a small glimpse of peoples' thoughts. I certainly think there's something lost with the limited interaction online, because there's just less of a chance to have the informal interactions where you get to know people and what they're thinking. When I've chatted with other 1Ls more informally, I find that people have pretty nuanced opinions that vary by topic. Some have views that are different from what I would have thought, had I only ever heard them speak in a more formal setting where we are often discussing complicated and controversial topics. But I also had the opportunity to meet with others in person during the summer/start of the semester, back when we could actually meet up and distance outside. Like a good chunk of the class, I'm not in Victoria though, so I don't really know what it's like there right now. I would take the graffiti in the city with a grain of salt, given what's transpired over the summer and the strong response to it. FWIW, I've only ever heard you say very smart things, and I like what you have to say. I think a fair amount of (most?) people would be more receptive to your views than you think... but I agree it's hard to get that given the overall 'class vibe', especially over Zoom. I think it's a BC thing in general, albeit the GVRD has quite a variety of views and rural BC is also different from the GVRD/Victoria. When I was at UBC, the "social justice and diversity" felt a lot more performative than anything (especially from the administration). It might have changed since I was there during my undergrad, but UBC certainly does have a more 'corporate' vibe. 1. GM is a great person, and I would be beyond shocked if anyone thought of GM as the next Donaldino Pumperino. 🤣 2. There is a co-op program, which is certainly helpful for work experience. As I've heard from upper-years and practicing lawyers, UVic has more or less the same opportunities as UBC so it really depends what you make of your time + grades. Things might be a bit different with COVID this year, though. 3. Every exam class is open book. I would be surprised if anyone even had the TIME to cheat, because the midterms were such a time crunch. Also, would anyone really want to put the fate of their grades in someone else's hands or jeopardize their future career? I doubt it. Second GM: Contracts is great! 10/10 profs. Only downside is having to read older UK decisions written by judges who don't know what paragraphs are. BUT, they've made it a semester-long course instead of a year long. We don't have Torts or Crim till next term. I personally would prefer reading 120 pages of 3 different courses, rather than 100 of 1 course, plus we just don't have that experience with issue identification that comes with time... so I think that's suffered from an online format. But it really depends on you as a person.
    • Thanks for the feedback I appreciate it!  If anyone else is wondering I heard back from admissions and they assess applications first round with the highest score on record, if they can give you an offer they do so, if not they reassess when Jan LSAT scores are released and readjust your index score for the second round of offers if your write in Jan and score higher. 
    • 3.54 and 3.75 per OLSAS conversion?

×
×
  • Create New...