Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
utor21

Accepted to U of T 2018

Recommended Posts

got the call an hour ago!! 

cGPA: 3.7 (but lower 1st year so L2 is 3.9) 
LSAT: 165
strong personal statement and lots of ECs 
last name in middle of alphabet 

Congrats to everyone!! 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, melm8 said:

got the call an hour ago!! 

cGPA: 3.7 (but lower 1st year so L2 is 3.9) 
LSAT: 165
strong personal statement and lots of ECs 
last name in middle of alphabet 

Congrats to everyone!! 

Congratulations! Would you mind sharing your B3?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got my voicemail this evening! 167 LSAT and 84% average. Also a varsity athlete if that matters. So thrilled, I cried !

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In! Got the call this evening. I almost burst into tears on the phone haha. 

GPA 3.96/4.00

LSAT 163 

Extensive ECs 

Best of luck to everyone! 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, wildcat23 said:

still waiting on mine :( is anyone else still 

Edited by OldOne
Incorrect info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Accepted! Because of the time difference they called while I was asleep, but I just got up and saw the email. 

LSAT: 168

CGPA: 3.9 

U of T is my second choice so I'm very happy :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IN!!!

cGPA: 3.65

B3: 3.82

LSAT:164

Great EC's (or so I would like to think: research in STEM in Canada and abroad). 

Just got the email right now. I didn't receive a call but my voicemail isn't properly set up so perhaps they called while I was in the subway today???

In shock. 

Edited by piglet2017
I was paranoid about the email being real lol very unnecessary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got my admission voicemail. I was at a company Christmas party so I must have missed it while dancing (according to the time, to Toto's Africa of all things, bless the rains) but when I heard my voicemail at Union Station I screamed so loud someone might have called TTC security on me.

 

Oh my god I waited the past five years of my life for this. 

CGPA: 3.7 (or 3.72 depending on how OLSAS calculates study abroad credits)

B3: 3.81 (or 3.82)

LSAT: Cancelled, 162, 165

Got the voicemail at 8:30 pm (a lot later than I ever expected.) 

 

I wish the best of luck to everyone waiting and congratulations to everyone admitted. Whether you'll be attending U of T or not, I hope to someday meet you in the legal field where your forum name becomes a face to recognize and a great person to remember. Cheers. 

Edited by xdarkwhite
  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in - guess it's about time I stopped lurking and made an account here, so hi everyone! :) 

LSAT: 179

cGPA: 3.95

Probably below average ECs, but a strong PS and optional essay.

Edited by AlaricTaves
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, AlaricTaves said:

I'm in - guess it's about time I stopped lurking and made an account here, so hi everyone! :) 

LSAT: 179

cGPA: 3.95

Probably below average ECs, but a strong PS and optional essay.

Unreal stats, congrats!!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m in complete shock and only wanted to post to give some hope to the lower LSAT scorers like me.

Got in with a:

cGPA: 3.81 / B3: 3.93 / L2: 3.94

LSAT: 148, 158, (waiting on December)

Last name: close to the top of the alphabet.

I would say my PS and application as a whole were mediocre at best. 

It’s so hard to believe I got in, but I guess the LSAT isn’t everything, goodluck everyone!

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, EscobarJr said:

I’m in complete shock and only wanted to post to give some hope to the lower LSAT scorers like me.

Got in with a:

cGPA: 3.81 / B3: 3.93 / L2: 3.94

LSAT: 148, 158, (waiting on December)

Last name: close to the top of the alphabet.

I would say my PS and application as a whole were mediocre at best. 

It’s so hard to believe I got in, but I guess the LSAT isn’t everything, goodluck everyone!

Congratulations, so happy for u!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, EscobarJr said:

I’m in complete shock and only wanted to post to give some hope to the lower LSAT scorers like me.

Got in with a:

cGPA: 3.81 / B3: 3.93 / L2: 3.94

LSAT: 148, 158, (waiting on December)

Last name: close to the top of the alphabet.

I would say my PS and application as a whole were mediocre at best. 

It’s so hard to believe I got in, but I guess the LSAT isn’t everything, goodluck everyone!

Congrats!!!

Was this today or yesterday?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, roadrunner said:

Accepted! Because of the time difference they called while I was asleep, but I just got up and saw the email. 

LSAT: 168

CGPA: 3.9 

U of T is my second choice so I'm very happy :)

What is your first choice, if I may ask?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You just completed your articles in insurance defense and yet claim to have vast knowledge in the field of medical and health law. You've also got an  LLM that focused on 11 different topics unrelated to insurance or civil lit.  But the type of law you are really interested in is IP law.   And you intend to tell employers about your poly marriage?  During interviews I assume?  Only way it could be a red flag is if you told someone unless your last name is Blackmore.  
    • The reason many 1Ls get crushed after grades come out is because they mistakenly carried the "hard work means good grades" mentality into law school. The bolded part of your post is me pointing out that you're making the same mistake. What I think you really need to do is change how you prepare for exams. My advice to you FOLLOW AT YOUR OWN RISK I'm a fellow slow worker. When I prepared for midterms like everyone else, I got the same marks as everyone else. When I prepared for final exams like a slow worker, I beat the curve in 6/7 courses. The only course where I didn't beat the curve was also the only class I made the mistake of not doing the aforementioned. Understand that you can't do all of the assigned work. It may take other people 1 hour to do a 30 page reading while it takes you 4 hours (I personally need to read every word on the page). Doing all of the assigned work is just not feasible for you because its not an efficient use of time. There is absolutely no shame in admitting this or accepting this. Doing all of the assigned work is just one of many different ways to prepare for the exam. You should let my exam grade determine whether your unique method of preparation is right or wrong. Understand that doing all of the assigned work doesn't mean you shouldn't be doing any work or even less work, it just means you should be doing the work that helps you best prepare for the exam. Doing the readings - Your main focus should be to make the most efficient use of your time (i.e. doing the type of work that helps you, as an individual, best prepare for the exam) First, check the syllabus to understand the place of this reading in the class (you'd be surprised how many people overlook the value of the course syllabus). The question here is: what am I reading? What topic is this reading on? How many days will you be dealing with this topic? How many pages is it? Is the topic a standalone topic or one piece of a bigger topic? This will give you a rough idea of how much time and concern you should give to this topic and also generally primes you for the work you need to do. Second, very briefly skim the reading while paying attention to the structure of the reading. Read the headings, intros, conclusions, etc. This will help you understand the skeleton of the reading.  Third, once you understand what you're reading (i.e. after completing the first two steps) your next question is: why am I reading this? Why has the professor assigned this reading? In other words, what does your professor want you, as a student, to get out of this reading for the purposes of their class? To answer these questions, look to course summaries/CANs from upper years who have taken the same course with the same professor.  Fourth, now you know what you're reading and why you're reading it. The question now here is: what does this reading say about that? If you're a person who's comfortable relying on a summary/CAN, then rely on your summaries/CANs to provide answer the answer to this question. If you're a person who's more comfortable doing the reading, then let the summaries/CANs create the signposts of what's important in the reading so you can focus on that and allocate your time effectively.  For example, if you're dealing with the topic of sexual assault in 1L criminal law, then you're probably going to want to read all of Ewanchuk and only focus on the bare essentials in every other case (e.g. R v Chase - only matters because it tells us how to interpret the sexual nature element of the AR; R v Cuerrier - only matters because it tells us when fraud vitiates consent and what L'Heureux Dube and McLachlin say in their respective dissents, respectfully, doesn't matter for the strict purpose of your exam unless your professor cares about policy; R v Mabior - only matters because it tells us when non-disclosure of HIV status vitiates consent/constitutes fraud; R v JA - only matters because it tells us to how interpret consent and, respectfully, Fish's dissent doesn't matter unless your professor cares about policy; etc)  Lectures - The purpose of lectures isn't for the professor to spoon-feed you the material, for you to practice your skills as a typist and copy the lecture verbatim or for you to get your online Christmas shopping done. The purpose of the lecture is for the professor to: Confirm to you that you're on the right track (i.e. you've done the aforementioned Reading stage correctly and understand what the topic is, why you're doing the reading, and that you know what you need to know) Clarify anything in the readings and/or correct any mistakes/things missing from your understanding/notes or the summaries/CANs you've relied on Provide you with their unique perspective/opinion/approach to the topic at hand. You're going to keep this in mind when writing your exam in order to cater to their beliefs, prejudices. For example, if you have a feminist professor, don't argue that sex work should be criminalized on an exam. Present both sides to the argument, and in one sentence say that you support it even if you don't. As a future lawyer, you're going to be arguing a lot of things you don't agree with or believe in for your own personal gain. Might as well start early   Give you any hints about the exam. Professors notice if/when the herd thins out during the school year and some times will be inclined to reward students for attending. There have been multiple times that I've gotten useful hints about exams from a professor simply for being present during a boring lecture in the middle of October Exams - Exam-writing is a skill. Learn it. Read books on how to develop the skill. My recommendation is "Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades" by Alex Schimel. Create your own outline. In your 5 to 15 page outline, you should have every piece of the "what you need to know" part of each of your readings. There should be absolutely no superfluous bullshit, fluff or fat on your outline. You've literally condensed the entire course into those 5 to 15 pages. Your casebook, other peoples outlines/CANs, etc were all just tools for you to arrive at your own outline.  Learn your outline cold. I mean cold. This doesn't only mean just memorizing it. You should be able to open up ExamSoft and type out the blackletter law part of your future exam answer on demand and at near-lightning speed. The only class that I actually did this properly for was the one I finished at the top (and despite missing a major issue on the exam) and the other class that I did this, but sort of half-assed, I got an A- despite writing one paragraph for a question worth 33% question because I blanked out. Once you've learned the outline cold, take a few old exam questions and do timed exams on ExamSoft. Your focus is to type out the blackletter law as you've been doing and then actually apply it to the facts. Review your answer by yourself, then with a professor (if you can reach them/they'll allow this) and finally compare against old exam answers. Many people will disagree with this but once you do a few of these timed exams, you'll start to notice repeating patterns in terms of the issues tested, answer structures, etc (there can only be so many and also many professors are creatures of habit). 
    • Had a similar thing happen: What can you tell me about person X? Should I know person X? They mentioned you in their interview... I have no idea who this person is...
×
×
  • Create New...