-
Recent Posts
-
Selling all in Canadian Dollars, prices have been confirmed to be cheaper than brand new on Amazon.ca No, I did not use all of them, selling some for friends, bought second hand Want to buy all of them? Actual total price $353 Discount total package will be $300 + shipping (~$50, books are heavy :/) . No shipping fee if address is in Edmonton. Free delivery to your door in Edmonton. - Please PM! Cash or Canadian e-transfer only. Here’s a pic 😊 https://imgur.com/a/1pyIMQI Pick and choose The Loophole in LSAT Logical Reasoning by Ellen Cassidy - Price: $40 - Condition: 90/100, no writing, or markings at all The PowerScore LSAT Reading Comprehension Bible, 2020 edition - Price: $45 - Condition: 95/100, no writing or markings at all The PowerScore LSAT Logic Games Bible, 2015 edition - Price: $28 - Condition: 80/100, wear and tear, no writing Manhattan Prep: 5 lb. Book of LSAT Practice Drills: Over 5,000 questions across 180 drills - Price: $55 - Condition: 90/100, some pencil markings on 50 pages The LSAT Trainer by Mike Kim (1st Version) - Price: $40 - Condition: 70/100, wear and tear, some markings by pencils LSAT Unlocked 2018-2019: Proven Strategies For Every Question Type + Online - Price: $60 - Condition: 90/100, some pencil markings LSAT (Barron's Test Prep) - Price: $25 - Condition: 85/100, some pencil markings LSAT Decoded (PrepTests 52-61): Step-by-Step Solutions for 10 Actual, Official LSAT Exams - Price: $30 - Condition: 90/100, no pencil markings 10 New Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests: (PrepTests 52–61) - Price: $10 - Condition: 20/100, pencil markings, tape, funky stuff, wornout. Message me for a surprise deal with this purchase 😉. I assure you it’s worth your time. Serious inquiries only. Individual: The Official LSAT PrepTests from 72 to 80 - Price: $15 - Condition: 20/100, pencil markings, tape, funky stuff, worn out. Message me for a surprise deal with this purchase 😊. I assure you it’s worth your time. Serious inquiries only.
-
Just to support this point, UofT Law explicitly says this in their admission policies. “Moreover, we take into account the nature of the program and the undergraduate institution (or institutions) at which an applicant has studied. Specifically, programs and institutions have varying grading practices, which we take into account in our assessment. In general, the Admissions Committee examines each applicant's academic record with a view to meaningful and fair comparisons of undergraduate performance.” https://www.law.utoronto.ca/jd-admissions-policies
-
watch any account of adcomms members speaking of their experiences, they are building a class which involves a lot of micro and macro decisions when it comes to its composition, especially true for a school that could be considered top tier you just got shown that 21% (the largest of the chunks) of UofT admits are from deathly majors, what do you want law schools to do? dedicate half their fucking class to stem majors just to appease you and your friend's insecurities?
-
And which adcom did you serve on again? Your experience as *checks notes* never been to law school doesn’t seem to add much value. in any event, as an example, U of A admitted 5 students with a 3.5 GPA and a 161-162 lsat. It’s not a fool’s errand to apply and a 3.5 isn’t that difficult to overcome.
-
By humbledman · Posted
Firstly, I would say that there is a big difference between liberal and left. Universities tend to be liberal places, however, in certain parts of the arts it is very much on the left. I even said in my post that “it is not likely to eliminate you from consideration but that it is possible.” My understanding of the left is relatively representative, I know that people in other sociology courses have had experiences along these lines in other universities beside u of t in Canada and America. You appear to view liberals as being a part of the left, while I say there are liberals and there are leftists, I separate them and I realize my post didn’t make that clear and I shouldn’t of expected a reader to have known that I do that because, well no one knows me on here. I’ve read foucalt, Derrida etc. I know the jargon, it’s easy to manipulate as you can see with Sokol. I never insinuated that the entire left was like this as you seem to falsely assume. I was speaking to the idea that now a days it is more likely to have people dislike you, or people’s opinion be biased against if they associate you with conservative ideas, or principles. Mine was a risk-averse perspective, adding party may hurt and probably won’t help so I wouldn’t put it. This is probably coloured by my experiences, like people insinuating I was racist because I was white and asked a person of colour about their background. I may very well overestimate the probability of similar phenomenon occur in different circumstances, but like I said when it comes to such matters I take a very risk averse perspective.
-