Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
hopefulstudent1

Uqam Winter 2018

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I was wondering if anyone was planning on applying and/or has applied for the 2018 winter semester at Uqam?

If so, have you done anything to prepare yourself for the possible interview?

For the people who have previously applied in the winter period : does everyone get an interview? Or might we get rejected right away if our grades are too low?

Also, it seems like the questions are quite similar every year, so should I still prepare for the ones I saw in previous treads?

Thanks for your replies :)

Edited by hopefulstudent1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi! I've applied for winter 2018. I'm going to prepare for the interview (if i get it) by reading as much as I can on political/legal issues and prepare some answers from previous questions asked. 

What are ur stats?

Good luck! :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey! Same situation here. I applied with a 3.38 GPA. Pretty sure I will get refused but still, cost nothing to try.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey yall :)

My GPA is around 3.2-3.3 I believe (not too sure because mine was on 10 at uOttawa, so not sure what it is on 4.0 or 4.3).

I'm also pretty sure I will not get in but like you said JC0001, what do we have to lose lol.

What are your stats Choco23?

Let's keep eachother updated :) hopefully we'll hear about them soon!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Application for UQAM have been decreasing since a couple of years, so if we are lucky the winter GPA minimum will be less than last year (hoping!).

Usually the admission results are send at the end of november! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JC0001 said:

Application for UQAM have been decreasing since a couple of years, so if we are lucky the winter GPA minimum will be less than last year (hoping!).

Usually the admission results are send at the end of november! 

The average GPA of the last person who got an interview for fall 2016 was 3.5, it went up to 3.6 for fall 2017 ( the semester I applied ). Also, it was 3.5 for winter 2016 and went up to 3.55 in winter 2017. Just thought it would be useful information for you guys ! This is what you can find on UQAM's website : 

Automne 2017

Moyenne universitaire du dernier candidat préselectionné (base universitaire) : 3.6 / 4.3

Hiver 2017

Moyenne universitaire du dernier candidat préselectionné (base universitaire) : 3.55 / 4.3

Statistiques en date du 2017-07-17

 

I also did the interview for fall 2017 so don't hesitate if you have any questions ( PM me ) ☺ 

Edited by ishei
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, ishei said:

The average GPA of the last person who got an interview for fall 2016 was 3.5, it went up to 3.6 for fall 2017 ( the semester I applied ). Also, it was 3.5 for winter 2016 and went up to 3.55 in winter 2017. Just thought it would be useful information for you guys ! This is what you can find on UQAM's website : 

Automne 2017

Moyenne universitaire du dernier candidat préselectionné (base universitaire) : 3.6 / 4.3

Hiver 2017

Moyenne universitaire du dernier candidat préselectionné (base universitaire) : 3.55 / 4.3

Statistiques en date du 2017-07-17

 

I also did the interview for fall 2017 so don't hesitate if you have any questions ( PM me ) ☺ 

Thanks for the info =) If by miracle I get called for the interview be sure I will PM you =D Much appreciated!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys!

Best of luck to all ^_^ !!!

For those of you who will get an interview, here are most of the possible questions:

1)      Pourquoi  voulez-vous étudier en droit et pourquoi à l’UQAM?

2)      Parlez de vos implications politiques, sociales ou communautaires.

3)      Parlez-nous de votre parcours-cheminement. Qu'est ce qui vous a mené jusqu'ici?

4)      Que pensez-vous des médias ?

5)      Parlez-nous d’un événement important qui se passe au Québec ou dans le monde. Expliquez-nous pourquoi vous croyez qu’il est important OU Parlez-nous d'un événement marquant dans les nouvelles.

6)      Parlez-nous de quelque chose qui a rapport avec la culture : un livre que vous avez, une pièce que vous avez vu, un concert…

7)      Si vous étiez ministre, couperiez-vous dans l’éducation ou la santé ? Sur quels critères ou principes, baseriez-vous votre décision ?

8)      Parlez-nous d’une personnalité que vous admirez et pourquoi ?

9)      Decrivez votre idole dans le monde juridique?

10)   Il y a une usine qui fait beaucoup e pollution, mais crée beaucoup d’emplois, est-ce que tu décides de fermer l’usine ou de la laisser ouverte ?

11)   Quel événement marquant a eu lieu à l'extérieur de Québec ? Et pourquoi est-il important ?

12)   Définissez démocratie ou totalitarisme. Donnez des examples.

13)   Expliquez la situation des Autochtones.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly I didn't. It was too far from my home (living in St-Jerome). UQAM and UDEM are my only two choices right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Answer should be really soon. The UQAM Winter 2017 thread show people getting answer as soon as 18th of november 2016.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah me too.. still waiting. Ur profil still says "decision en attente" ?  And do you mind sharing ur stats with us? :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it still says decision en attente. My gpa is around 3.3-3.4 . My chances are low but who knows ;)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You just completed your articles in insurance defense and yet claim to have vast knowledge in the field of medical and health law. You've also got an  LLM that focused on 11 different topics unrelated to insurance or civil lit.  But the type of law you are really interested in is IP law.   And you intend to tell employers about your poly marriage?  During interviews I assume?  Only way it could be a red flag is if you told someone unless your last name is Blackmore.  
    • The reason many 1Ls get crushed after grades come out is because they mistakenly carried the "hard work means good grades" mentality into law school. The bolded part of your post is me pointing out that you're making the same mistake. What I think you really need to do is change how you prepare for exams. My advice to you FOLLOW AT YOUR OWN RISK I'm a fellow slow worker. When I prepared for midterms like everyone else, I got the same marks as everyone else. When I prepared for final exams like a slow worker, I beat the curve in 6/7 courses. The only course where I didn't beat the curve was also the only class I made the mistake of not doing the aforementioned. Understand that you can't do all of the assigned work. It may take other people 1 hour to do a 30 page reading while it takes you 4 hours (I personally need to read every word on the page). Doing all of the assigned work is just not feasible for you because its not an efficient use of time. There is absolutely no shame in admitting this or accepting this. Doing all of the assigned work is just one of many different ways to prepare for the exam. You should let my exam grade determine whether your unique method of preparation is right or wrong. Understand that doing all of the assigned work doesn't mean you shouldn't be doing any work or even less work, it just means you should be doing the work that helps you best prepare for the exam. Doing the readings - Your main focus should be to make the most efficient use of your time (i.e. doing the type of work that helps you, as an individual, best prepare for the exam) First, check the syllabus to understand the place of this reading in the class (you'd be surprised how many people overlook the value of the course syllabus). The question here is: what am I reading? What topic is this reading on? How many days will you be dealing with this topic? How many pages is it? Is the topic a standalone topic or one piece of a bigger topic? This will give you a rough idea of how much time and concern you should give to this topic and also generally primes you for the work you need to do. Second, very briefly skim the reading while paying attention to the structure of the reading. Read the headings, intros, conclusions, etc. This will help you understand the skeleton of the reading.  Third, once you understand what you're reading (i.e. after completing the first two steps) your next question is: why am I reading this? Why has the professor assigned this reading? In other words, what does your professor want you, as a student, to get out of this reading for the purposes of their class? To answer these questions, look to course summaries/CANs from upper years who have taken the same course with the same professor.  Fourth, now you know what you're reading and why you're reading it. The question now here is: what does this reading say about that? If you're a person who's comfortable relying on a summary/CAN, then rely on your summaries/CANs to provide answer the answer to this question. If you're a person who's more comfortable doing the reading, then let the summaries/CANs create the signposts of what's important in the reading so you can focus on that and allocate your time effectively.  For example, if you're dealing with the topic of sexual assault in 1L criminal law, then you're probably going to want to read all of Ewanchuk and only focus on the bare essentials in every other case (e.g. R v Chase - only matters because it tells us how to interpret the sexual nature element of the AR; R v Cuerrier - only matters because it tells us when fraud vitiates consent and what L'Heureux Dube and McLachlin say in their respective dissents, respectfully, doesn't matter for the strict purpose of your exam unless your professor cares about policy; R v Mabior - only matters because it tells us when non-disclosure of HIV status vitiates consent/constitutes fraud; R v JA - only matters because it tells us to how interpret consent and, respectfully, Fish's dissent doesn't matter unless your professor cares about policy; etc)  Lectures - The purpose of lectures isn't for the professor to spoon-feed you the material, for you to practice your skills as a typist and copy the lecture verbatim or for you to get your online Christmas shopping done. The purpose of the lecture is for the professor to: Confirm to you that you're on the right track (i.e. you've done the aforementioned Reading stage correctly and understand what the topic is, why you're doing the reading, and that you know what you need to know) Clarify anything in the readings and/or correct any mistakes/things missing from your understanding/notes or the summaries/CANs you've relied on Provide you with their unique perspective/opinion/approach to the topic at hand. You're going to keep this in mind when writing your exam in order to cater to their beliefs, prejudices. For example, if you have a feminist professor, don't argue that sex work should be criminalized on an exam. Present both sides to the argument, and in one sentence say that you support it even if you don't. As a future lawyer, you're going to be arguing a lot of things you don't agree with or believe in for your own personal gain. Might as well start early   Give you any hints about the exam. Professors notice if/when the herd thins out during the school year and some times will be inclined to reward students for attending. There have been multiple times that I've gotten useful hints about exams from a professor simply for being present during a boring lecture in the middle of October Exams - Exam-writing is a skill. Learn it. Read books on how to develop the skill. My recommendation is "Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades" by Alex Schimel. Create your own outline. In your 5 to 15 page outline, you should have every piece of the "what you need to know" part of each of your readings. There should be absolutely no superfluous bullshit, fluff or fat on your outline. You've literally condensed the entire course into those 5 to 15 pages. Your casebook, other peoples outlines/CANs, etc were all just tools for you to arrive at your own outline.  Learn your outline cold. I mean cold. This doesn't only mean just memorizing it. You should be able to open up ExamSoft and type out the blackletter law part of your future exam answer on demand and at near-lightning speed. The only class that I actually did this properly for was the one I finished at the top (and despite missing a major issue on the exam) and the other class that I did this, but sort of half-assed, I got an A- despite writing one paragraph for a question worth 33% question because I blanked out. Once you've learned the outline cold, take a few old exam questions and do timed exams on ExamSoft. Your focus is to type out the blackletter law as you've been doing and then actually apply it to the facts. Review your answer by yourself, then with a professor (if you can reach them/they'll allow this) and finally compare against old exam answers. Many people will disagree with this but once you do a few of these timed exams, you'll start to notice repeating patterns in terms of the issues tested, answer structures, etc (there can only be so many and also many professors are creatures of habit). 
    • Had a similar thing happen: What can you tell me about person X? Should I know person X? They mentioned you in their interview... I have no idea who this person is...
×
×
  • Create New...