Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
canadian5623

Is it bad to only have 3 classes for one semester?

Recommended Posts

I want to drop one of my classes I am doing badly in, but then I'll only have 3 classes this semester which makes me a part time student. I plan on taking summer school so make up for the credits. Is this frowned upon? How will this affect my chances? thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had one semester of 3 classes - but I also had a number of years with full course loads, AP credit, and summer classes. In my case, my 3 class/PT semester was my very last semester. 

 

I don't think anyone can say exactly how it will affect your chances - it depends. But it didn't seem to be an obstacle for me. 

 

ETA: At this point in the year, would dropping the class mean it would still show up on your transcript? That might be another factor to consider.

Edited by Cabaret

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i took 3 courses a semester and 2 in the summer for 3 years straight and got a few acceptances, don't worry too much about it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It may vary from school to school, but I also had some semesters of 3-4 courses due to work commitments and it didn't seem to have a negative impact for me. You could always contact the school(s) you're most interested in to confirm.

 

And as Carbaret mentioned, if withdrawing shows on your transcript it may have more of an impact than simply the number of courses you were enrolled in might -- I have no idea. You should definitely look into that before you drop. I can't recall now how late in the semester you could drop a course without consequences, but I know that at some point you would receive an F in the course if you dropped and I believe it was around the beginning of March at my school -- not sure if that would be the case for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had one semester with 3 courses (though this still classified me as a full time student), one with 2 courses and a semester with one course. I also had multiple semesters of 4 courses instead of 5. I have had multiple acceptances this cycle. I would not worry too much about dropping your course. I wouldn't make it a habit of taking a reduced course load (as many admission website say they do take course load into consideration), but then again if one took a glance at my transcripts you would see I often was not taking a full 5 course semester.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't seem to matter. My last three semesters (including two semesters of grad school) were 3,3, and 2 courses taken per term. I also had a three-course semester in my third year somewhere.

I got into everywhere I applied. If the school doesn't stipulate that you need a full semester for your GPA to count (U Sask has a requirement like this) then you need not worry about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also took 3 courses and contacted all the schools I applied for (Osgoode, Western, Queen's, and U of T) and the only school that said they preferred candidates who take a full courseload was Western. All the other schools asked for an explanation in my essay or just a quick note to let them know why I was taking a lighter courseload. 

Edited by corruptfate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also took 3 courses and contacted all the schools I applied for (Osgoode, Western, Queen's, and U of T) and the only school that said they preferred candidates who take a full courseload was Western. All the other schools asked for an explanation in my essay or just a quick note to let them know why I was taking a lighter courseload. 

 

However, I was still admitted to Western with semesters with reduced course loads. I do think I remember mentioning the reason briefly for me taking a semester with three courses and why I did a year of part time school in my PS. So it just shows that while they may take it into consideration, taking three courses in a semester will not necessarily preclude you from receiving acceptances.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for taking the time to answer my previous question. I may be applying this cycle and have a question with regards to the Sketch part of the application. When I previously applied to Law School I added every little volunteer/extracurricular from the time I entered University. For simplicity purposes, I wanted to retain only the last 3-4 years of relevant experience. Would this be a problem for an individual that had more sketch items in a previous application 1-2 years ago? For example some activities are not included at all whereas they were on a previous application?  And just for the sake of knowing I guess, would you have access to and look back at a previous application if you were assessing a candidate?  
    • No, I think the bias is good because it makes whiny conservatives like you fill your diaper. Your first thought on hearing the Prime Minister did something racist was run to bump an old thread to try and score points for your “team”, because to you the racism isn’t really the issue, it’s just an opportunity to poke a lib in the eye.
    • I don't think that people are necessarily laughing at the essence of what you are saying.  What you are saying isn't completely crazy.  The pace at which you are suggesting this will all happen is likely, in part, what they are doubting.  The reactions may also be partly attributed to the fact that you haven't (I don't think?) actually practiced law at this point. I just don't think the legal profession will be completely revolutionized as imminently as your comments suggest.  While I (and probably others) can appreciate arguments that computers will replace certain functions currently done by humans and that some of Ryerson's tech-forward training could be helpful (if well executed), I think it will take time to get there.  While I do appreciate the need for lawyers to have more technical skills and to better integrate technology into law schools (whatever that means...I'm old), I don't understand how this translates to what seems to be your critique of the substance of law school (i.e. what is taught not the way it is taught).  I do think that law school, especially 1L, should continue to include the case reading, making legal arguments, etc. that you seem to criticize, both because I can't imagine a scenario where humans interacting with AI technology don't need a baseline level of knowledge of the law and because I don't think these changes are going to come all that quickly.  It is also pretty absurd to claim that summaries from 2003 are "the same".  75% the same?  Sure.  But actually the same?  Doubtful.  Even if they were "the same", that doesn't demonstrate that law school curricula are dated or make them irrelevant.  If that is the current state of the law, then that is the current state of the law.
    • Agreed. Also I’m at UBC (where OP also seems to attend) and I’ve had several recruiters at big firms tell me, unprompted, that we have a great CSO that understands exactly what the firms want. Probably since our CSO people have worked at large firms.  Just wanted to add that since I don’t think it’s helpful for OP to go down the path of thinking an incompetent CSO was his or her issue. 
    • Okay since I am getting laughs here. Fine, here's a fairly "primitive" model of how natural language processing algorithm can be used. Read this, its an open-source Python library designed for building legal tech software: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3192101 This is an easier to digest thing describing how AI is reshaping law.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3381798
×
×
  • Create New...