Jump to content
redlead

Tips for prospective law students from a former admissions committee member

Recommended Posts

I've already finished the application process but this post is great. A lot of information I had to bring together from different places brought into one post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm reading this and praying that I avoided all the pitfalls mentioned in my applications this year.

 

Very informative post.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

D) I would encourage students not to spend as much space on #3 as they currently do. Compliments about the law school don't usually get you very far, unless they are very specific to your interests, e.g., "As you can see from my degree in biochemistry, I am very interested in the natural sciences, so I am especially interested in X law school because it is the only school with a natural sciences law clinic." Complimenting the law school in general doesn't help the committee - they already think their school is great, and they want to know about you. Compliments that are overblown can actually hurt your application. If you say something about the school being "world-renowned for their legal clinics" when they are not that well-recognized, the committee will think you're blowing smoke, and it won't help your chances.

 

 

 

 

Question on this specifically. I used space on every law school personal statement saying something along the lines of "I wish to go to UBC, because I one day intend on practicing in Vancouver, because I like the Ocean (or whatever)". 

 

Was this a complete waste of time in your opinion? I thought that Law Schools in wouldn't want to spend their limited resources training a guy who would immediately move out of province or country. Could have been a waste of space though.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I accidentally sent a rough draft instead of my main draft of a personal statement (forgot to hit save when I made my last edits, really dumb mistake), for my first choice in school. There is an omitted word and I also used the plural version of one word when it should be singular. How much will this damage my application? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I accidentally sent a rough draft instead of my main draft of a personal statement (forgot to hit save when I made my last edits, really dumb mistake), for my first choice in school. There is an omitted word and I also used the plural version of one word when it should be singular. How much will this damage my application? 

 

I can imagine you are feeling incredibly anxious right now, but there is nothing you can do about it at this point. I imagine it would be frowned upon if the errors were particularly glaring, but depending on which school you are applied to the ad com may be willing to overlook it in lieu of your stats (assuming they are good)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My stats are right around the average of getting in for the school, however I have noticed many people with lower stats have been admitted while I have not. Not sure if I should be worried.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question on this specifically. I used space on every law school personal statement saying something along the lines of "I wish to go to UBC, because I one day intend on practicing in Vancouver, because I like the Ocean (or whatever)". 

Was this a complete waste of time in your opinion? I thought that Law Schools in wouldn't want to spend their limited resources training a guy who would immediately move out of province or country. Could have been a waste of space though.

It might depend on the law school, but at our school, the committee didn't seem to care whether someone was a "flight risk". The school cares about keeping you for all three years, but after that, they're happy to see you tromping all over the world wherever your career may take you. It probably won't hurt your application, but it's not likely to be a significant helper. Indicating your interest and attachment to a particular city will help you when you're applying for articles, though, because law firms do care about flight risks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Question on this specifically. I used space on every law school personal statement saying something along the lines of "I wish to go to UBC, because I one day intend on practicing in Vancouver, because I like the Ocean (or whatever)". 

 

Was this a complete waste of time in your opinion? I thought that Law Schools in wouldn't want to spend their limited resources training a guy who would immediately move out of province or country. Could have been a waste of space though.

 

UBC is straight up index score, the admissions guy there (think his name was gareth) told me to my face they don't  care about the personal statement at all. they don't even take reference letters.

Edited by JohnsonWest
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My stats are right around the average of getting in for the school, however I have noticed many people with lower stats have been admitted while I have not. Not sure if I should be worried.

I wouldn't stress about it (although that's easier said than done). The admissions committee really only can go through so many files at once, so very often there's just a bit of lag before your application gets read. The "holistic" schools will have the committee read every application in full, so those schools can take a while to hear from. More numbers-based schools will often give offers to people with really strong numbers without showing the file to the committee (it is still read in full by an admissions officer, who refers it to the committee if there are any red flags). Those with numbers in the middle will have their files go to the committee. It sounds like you're right at the average (stats-wise) so your file may not have been read yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

UBC is straight up index score, the admissions guy there (think his name was gareth) told me to my face they don't  care about the personal statement at all. they don't even take reference letters.

Actually I just made that one up because I was in Vancouver the afternoon I posted about that. I never actually applied to UBC. 

U of A told me the exact same thing BTW.

Edited by AntelopeofZeus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I just made that one up because I was in Vancouver the afternoon I posted about that. I never actually applied to UBC. 

U of A told me the exact same thing BTW.

 

yup, UofA is also index score

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't stress about it (although that's easier said than done). The admissions committee really only can go through so many files at once, so very often there's just a bit of lag before your application gets read. The "holistic" schools will have the committee read every application in full, so those schools can take a while to hear from. More numbers-based schools will often give offers to people with really strong numbers without showing the file to the committee (it is still read in full by an admissions officer, who refers it to the committee if there are any red flags). Those with numbers in the middle will have their files go to the committee. It sounds like you're right at the average (stats-wise) so your file may not have been read yet.

 

If you don't mind me asking, what is considered a "red flag" by an admission officer at a number-based school when looking over a strong application?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you don't mind me asking, what is considered a "red flag" by an admission officer at a number-based school when looking over a strong application?

Some examples that I came across in my year were: very poorly written personal statements (where it's obvious that either no effort was put in or the applicant has really weak writing skills); bizarre comments in the personal statement; notations relating to academic dishonesty on the transcript; and "drops" that are wildly out of sync with the rest of the applicant's grades. These issues are rare, but my understanding from the faculty members on the committee was that a handful or so are found each year. If one of these issues comes up, you may still get an offer from the school, but the admissions officer will want the committee to read the file and the committee may do some follow-up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you be able to comment on course loads? Specifically a lower amount of classes and justifying it. Due to financial circumstances I will only be able to take 2 classes a semester till the end of my degree, delaying it further, however I don't want the adcoms to believe that I am taking two classes just to boost my gpa. 

Thanks 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Some examples that I came across in my year were: very poorly written personal statements (where it's obvious that either no effort was put in or the applicant has really weak writing skills); bizarre comments in the personal statement; notations relating to academic dishonesty on the transcript; and "drops" that are wildly out of sync with the rest of the applicant's grades. These issues are rare, but my understanding from the faculty members on the committee was that a handful or so are found each year. If one of these issues comes up, you may still get an offer from the school, but the admissions officer will want the committee to read the file and the committee may do some follow-up.

 

could you expand on that part please 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you be able to comment on course loads? Specifically a lower amount of classes and justifying it. Due to financial circumstances I will only be able to take 2 classes a semester till the end of my degree, delaying it further, however I don't want the adcoms to believe that I am taking two classes just to boost my gpa. 

Thanks 

You may want to check with the schools you are interested in, if you haven't already. Some schools won't consider part-time students.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you be able to comment on course loads? Specifically a lower amount of classes and justifying it. Due to financial circumstances I will only be able to take 2 classes a semester till the end of my degree, delaying it further, however I don't want the adcoms to believe that I am taking two classes just to boost my gpa. 

Thanks 

 

When I was on the admissions committee, I don't think we ever assumed that someone was taking a reduced course load strictly as a GPA-boosting plan. However, there were times when we questioned whether someone would be able to handle a full time course load at law school because they had only ever attended undergraduate classes on a part time basis. It's a good thing to briefly address in your personal statement if you have no full time experience, or if your grades were quite a bit lower when you were taking courses full time.

Edited by redlead
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

could you expand on that part please 

 

Some law schools have an index system where they drop your lowest two or three grades from the calculation of your GPA. Usually the number of courses you can drop is dependent on how much of your undergraduate degree is complete. The dropped courses won't count against your GPA; however, an admissions committee look more closely at a candidate if they have an A average after dropped courses but they got Ds in both of the courses that were dropped. On the other hand, a candidate with an A average after dropped courses who got B-s in both dropped courses might not be so closely scrutinized.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I am more of an ambivert - I can be either introverted or extroverted, depending on the situation. For job interviews, I would generally be on the extroverted side of the spectrum. I also had the maximum number of interviews, and I was cautioned against it by people who thought it would be too much. This was some years ago, but from what I remember, it was unnecessary to do that many. It wasn't very exhausting for me, but I realize that the law school view of what is "hard" or "too much" or "tiring" is completely different from my experience. I had been through things in life much more intense and difficult than making small talk at a bunch of interviews and dinners, so it was fine. Some people found it hard to be "on" for so long, but that's where the extroverted tendencies help - that part was kind of fun when it wasn't terrifying or alienating. It does get complicated when you start getting into second and third interviews and dinners and so on because you can't do all of those and have to pick and choose.  So my issue wasn't so much the pace of the interviews, but just that it became apparent that there were only a few firms I had an interest in and a bunch of them where I really could not see myself working at all, but then I felt committed to keep selling myself to them having gone that far in the process. And of course you get caught up in everyone else's anxiety, so while it wasn't too demanding physically, it was emotionally - the extroverted side of you likely has lots of friends from law school going through the process and lots of 3L friends rooting for you and so my phone was constantly going off with people wanting to know how it was going, offering advice, complaining about their situation, etc.  As it turned out, I was able to predict which offers I would and wouldn't get and they lined up more or less with the firms where I had more of an interest, so there were a bunch of useless interviews where it was obvious I wasn't interested in them or them in me.  I would think 10 or 12 interviews are plenty and you should be able to narrow them down, but 20 will not be impossible, it's just silly.  I assume if you got 20, you have very good grades and an interesting resume, and if you're saying you're more of an extrovert, you're likely decent in interviews. I wouldn't think you have to worry about 20 interviews to maximize your chances of getting hired - that seems overly cautious to me. 
    • Just an FYI for whomever may be reading this, more than one account isn't allowed. If you have a reason for setting up a throwaway, it should be cleared with the mod team first. We can't be having every student who goes through the OCI process having duplicate accounts.  To the OP: you can continue this thread with the new account but for this thread only.  Once you receive answers to your questions, the second account will be suspended.
    • 1. I was referring to the difficulty of going from, say, Osgoode to a job in New York. Every year some students are hired by firms down south. (At U of T it can be as much as 10% of the class.) But these positions are highly competitive and firms are very grade selective. With respect to American law schools, conventional wisdom is that NY Big Law is the easiest market to get to. No one cares about ‘local ties’ in NY—and, more importantly, there are a ton of jobs. (The most competitive market is probably Washington, DC.) However! It’s still hard in the sense that you can quite easily go to a T14 law school and fail to secure a position.  2. It doesn’t really matter. You will have one year of work experience baked in to your student visa. Then, once you have a job, you apply for an H1-B through your prospective employer. If that doesn’t work out, you can fall back on NAFTAs TN status (knock on wood). You may be at a disadvantage with smaller firms, but the big shops hire foreign nationals all the time.
    • Thanks for the reply. 

      The two main issues you identify are cost and not being able to work in the public sector. I'm 99% sure that I want to work in the private sector, so the unavailability of public sector work isn't a problem for me. However, the cost is definitely something I'll have to consider; 300 grand (or more) is a hell of a thing to go through life with. I'd like to clarify a couple things:

      When you say "You can go to the NY from U of T, Osgoode, or McGill—but, that said, if your overriding concern is working in the US, you should know that it’s hard to pull off" are you saying that it would be difficult to pull off if I went to a Canadian law school, or difficult to pull off even if I went to school in the US?

      Would not being a permanent resident, as opposed to just not being a citizen, significantly impact my ability to find work in the private sector?

       
×