Jump to content
Thatguy

Ask a current student...

Recommended Posts

@Jethro - not every student is interested in visiting a country that oppresses the very people the Israelis stole the land from. Long live Palestine!

 

Not every student is interested in taking Wills, Law and Resistance, or any of the other elective courses offered. Doesn't change the fact that it is a viable option for some.

 

@that guy. This is on topic as Jethro recommended the trip. Presume you & Jethro "bonded" on this 1L trip :mad2:

 

You presume incorrectly. Not only do I not know Thatguy, I didn't participate in the Israel program. Also, the existence of the trip as a travel opportunity is on-topic. Your political opinions, on the other hand, are entirely irrelevant to this discussion. Let's focus on being useful for the incoming students without digressing into an age-old shouting match about the relative merits of Israel/Palestine, shall we?

 

Edit to add: I should say that I don't know that I know Thatguy; for all we know we've taken classes together. But I haven't made an IRL connection to anyone on this board.

Edited by Jethro
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

2L and 3L students..are you interested in selling your books?  the following is my first year schedule.  Please message me if so.

 

Course Code: LAW 1540

Course Name:

  • PROFESSOR: LUGTIG, SARAH SECTION: A01

    TITLE: COMP GUIDE TO LEGAL RESEARCH AUTHOR: MCCARNEY

    EDITION: 2013 ISBN: 9781552396520 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

  • PROFESSOR: LUGTIG, SARAH SECTION: A01

    TITLE: CDN GUIDE TO UNIFORM LEGAL CITATION AUTHOR: MCGILL LAW JOUR

    EDITION: 8TH ISBN: 9780779860753 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

Course Code: LAW 1500

Course Name:

  • PROFESSOR: SHORT, DONN SECTION: A03

    TITLE: PRINCIPLES OF PROPERTY LAW AUTHOR: ZIFF

    EDITION: 6TH ISBN: 9780779863471 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

Course Code: LAW 1460

Course Name:

  • PROFESSOR: GUNN, BRENDA SECTION: A03

    TITLE: CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW W/CODE AUTHOR: BAKAN

    EDITION: 4TH ISBN: 9781552393321 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

Course Code: LAW 1140

Course Name:

  • PROFESSOR: DEUTSCHER, DAVID SECTION: A03

    TITLE: 2016 MARTIN'S POCKET CRIMINAL CODE AUTHOR: GREENSPAN

    EDITION: 2016 ISBN: 9780888047403 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

  • PROFESSOR: DEUTSCHER, DAVID SECTION: A03

    TITLE: LEARNING CANADIAN CRIMINAL LAW AUTHOR: STUART

    EDITION: 13TH 15 ISBN: 9780779864430 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

Course Code: LAW 1480

Course Name:

  • PROFESSOR: IRVINE, JOHN SECTION: A03

    TITLE: LAW OF TORTS AUTHOR: OSBORNE

    EDITION: 5TH 15 ISBN: 9781552214008 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

Course Code: LAW 1100

Course Name:

  • PROFESSOR: MACPHERSON, DARCY SECTION: A03

    TITLE: CONTRACTS VOLUME 1 AUTHOR: LAW 1100

    EDITION: F16 ISBN: 9780100018716 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

  • PROFESSOR: MACPHERSON, DARCY SECTION: A03

    TITLE: CONTRACTS VOLUME 2 AUTHOR: LAW 1100

    EDITION: F16 ISBN: 9780100018730 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

     

Course Code: LAW 1530

Course Name:

  • PROFESSOR: TURNBULL, LORNA SECTION: A02

    TITLE: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF LAW AUTHOR: WADDAMS

    EDITION: 7TH 10 ISBN: 9780779829064 REQUIRED/OPTIONAL: RQ

 

 

I'm not sure if you've purchased books or not, but just in case I thought I'd chip in bit. Re: criminal law, your listed prof, Professor Deutscher, will not be teaching this year. Not sure who will be taking his place, but he is the only person I've ever heard of who requires students to buy an annotated Criminal Code. I strongly suggest anyone in this section wait until class starts to see what books will actually be required.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if you've purchased books or not, but just in case I thought I'd chip in bit. Re: criminal law, your listed prof, Professor Deutscher, will not be teaching this year. Not sure who will be taking his place, but he is the only person I've ever heard of who requires students to buy an annotated Criminal Code. I strongly suggest anyone in this section wait until class starts to see what books will actually be required.

 

thanks for the update!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also going into 3L. Also happy to answer questions.

 

Also did the Israel trip. It's a great experience. I spent time after the trip travelling in the West Bank (East Jerusalem, Bethlehem, Hebron). If you intend to understand the region, a full boycott will make it pretty hard to understand the complete situation. The educational content you get at HUJI is also quite good because it's mostly academics and government types that are faithfully seeking solutions. I was ready for propaganda but it was thankfully quite balanced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested in Manitoba as I have family there but I'm from Toronto. Does anyone know the difficulty in returning to Toronto to work after attending Manitoba for law? Is it safe to assume that almost all of the class is from either Manitoba or Western Canada?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested in Manitoba as I have family there but I'm from Toronto. Does anyone know the difficulty in returning to Toronto to work after attending Manitoba for law? Is it safe to assume that almost all of the class is from either Manitoba or Western Canada?

 

There are people in my year who've been hired at firms in Ontario, both on and off Bay Street. If you want to go back, it can be done, but you will have to put in some effort sourcing jobs and networking out of province, which is not to be viewed lightly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm interested in Manitoba as I have family there but I'm from Toronto. Does anyone know the difficulty in returning to Toronto to work after attending Manitoba for law? Is it safe to assume that almost all of the class is from either Manitoba or Western Canada?

 

I think it varies from year to year. I've heard that it's been as high as 50/50 in the past, but according to the dean this year's incoming class was 80% Manitoban. I have, however, met a couple people from Vancouver and one from Brampton. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been told by a few friends of mine who are recent U of M law grads that the Socratic method is no longer frequently employed, even in first year, and that classes consist mostly of lectures. To what extent is that actually the case?

There are sill some that use the Socratic method. Some will just ask questions to the class generally and anyone can anwsers. Some profs will lecture the whole time. It really depends on the profs. I have a mix of all the styles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure this is somewhere in the threads but I've yet to find it with the search engine. Is working at all during 1L advised? I have a good job that is part time but I know the 1L marks are of utmost importance. Does anyone have any advice on this? I have been thinking of quiting because it is retail and would require weekend or evening work (both key study times).

Probably looks like i've already made my decision but i'm interested in a few opinions and experiences!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure this is somewhere in the threads but I've yet to find it with the search engine. Is working at all during 1L advised? I have a good job that is part time but I know the 1L marks are of utmost importance. Does anyone have any advice on this? I have been thinking of quiting because it is retail and would require weekend or evening work (both key study times).

 

Probably looks like i've already made my decision but i'm interested in a few opinions and experiences!

 

Depends on how much time you need to devote to studying. I worked through school, but limited it to once per week. I also didn't have much of a social life, but it comes down to prioritizing and sticking to your plan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure this is somewhere in the threads but I've yet to find it with the search engine. Is working at all during 1L advised? I have a good job that is part time but I know the 1L marks are of utmost importance. Does anyone have any advice on this? I have been thinking of quiting because it is retail and would require weekend or evening work (both key study times).

 

Probably looks like i've already made my decision but i'm interested in a few opinions and experiences!

 

I worked in first year, not a ton but 5-10 hours a week. There are going to be times when working won't be feasible, but at the same time your life will not, and cannot be law school 24/7. You need a break, and that break can be working retail while earning a little bit of cash. Sometimes the mindlessness of a part-time job is a welcome reprieve.

 

As for your statement that 1L marks are of utmost importance, I would push back a little bit on that. All law school grades are important, but I think 2L grades have a greater impact on your articling prospects. Thats not to say 1L grades don't matter, but working is far more difficult in second year so earning a little in first year can be quite helpful.

 

My advice would be to keep the job and see if you can handle both workloads. If not, you explain to your boss your situation and leave your job. If you can do both, great.

I just wouldn't leave a part-time job without knowing whether you can or cannot handle it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I really want to start reading before school starts but realize there is no booklist available until we get our sections in August. Is there ANYTHING or any single textbook even that's used for every prof for a specific class?!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I really want to start reading before school starts but realize there is no booklist available until we get our sections in August. Is there ANYTHING or any single textbook even that's used for every prof for a specific class?!

 

For the love of god don't.

 

Read for pleasure. Do not start reading for school.

 

Generally speaking reading at law school consists of reading cases, not textbooks. At this point reading cases will offer little benefit, and could actually make the fall tougher.

 

Go enjoy your summer. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been told that for those who INSIST on something, Getting to Maybe is okay filler before school starts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I really want to start reading before school starts but realize there is no booklist available until we get our sections in August. Is there ANYTHING or any single textbook even that's used for every prof for a specific class?!

This year all three sections of Property are using Principles of Property of Law, 6th ed by Ziff, and all Constitutional Law sections are using Canadian Constitutional Law, 4th ed by Bakan. (And not to be that guy, but I am selling both.)

 

I would really recommend not reading anything law related before class starts. Don't burn yourself out on reading until at least December. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This year all three sections of Property are using Principles of Property of Law, 6th ed by Ziff, and all Constitutional Law sections are using Canadian Constitutional Law, 4th ed by Bakan. (And not to be that guy, but I am selling both.)

 

I would really recommend not reading anything law related before class starts. Don't burn yourself out on reading until at least December. 

Someone say my name?

Edited by Thatguy
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking to purchase some first year textbooks. Looking for:

 

- Law of Contracts (Mccamus 2nd ed)

- Law of Contracts (waddams 6th Ed)

-Criminal Law and Procedure (Roach 11th Ed)

-Law of Torts (Osborne 5th Ed)

-Introduction to the Study of Law (Waddams 8th Ed)

-Canadian guide to uniform legal citation (McGill 8th ed)

-comp guide to legal research (McCarney 2nd Ed)

 

If you are looking to sell any of these textbooks please message me. Will come to you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does Manitoba Law take entire CGPA? How does this work? And what does everyone in the accepted threads mean by "Drops"?

 

Thank you for clarifying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You just completed your articles in insurance defense and yet claim to have vast knowledge in the field of medical and health law. You've also got an  LLM that focused on 11 different topics unrelated to insurance or civil lit.  But the type of law you are really interested in is IP law.   And you intend to tell employers about your poly marriage?  During interviews I assume?  Only way it could be a red flag is if you told someone unless your last name is Blackmore.  
    • The reason many 1Ls get crushed after grades come out is because they mistakenly carried the "hard work means good grades" mentality into law school. The bolded part of your post is me pointing out that you're making the same mistake. What I think you really need to do is change how you prepare for exams. My advice to you FOLLOW AT YOUR OWN RISK I'm a fellow slow worker. When I prepared for midterms like everyone else, I got the same marks as everyone else. When I prepared for final exams like a slow worker, I beat the curve in 6/7 courses. The only course where I didn't beat the curve was also the only class I made the mistake of not doing the aforementioned. Understand that you can't do all of the assigned work. It may take other people 1 hour to do a 30 page reading while it takes you 4 hours (I personally need to read every word on the page). Doing all of the assigned work is just not feasible for you because its not an efficient use of time. There is absolutely no shame in admitting this or accepting this. Doing all of the assigned work is just one of many different ways to prepare for the exam. You should let my exam grade determine whether your unique method of preparation is right or wrong. Understand that doing all of the assigned work doesn't mean you shouldn't be doing any work or even less work, it just means you should be doing the work that helps you best prepare for the exam. Doing the readings - Your main focus should be to make the most efficient use of your time (i.e. doing the type of work that helps you, as an individual, best prepare for the exam) First, check the syllabus to understand the place of this reading in the class (you'd be surprised how many people overlook the value of the course syllabus). The question here is: what am I reading? What topic is this reading on? How many days will you be dealing with this topic? How many pages is it? Is the topic a standalone topic or one piece of a bigger topic? This will give you a rough idea of how much time and concern you should give to this topic and also generally primes you for the work you need to do. Second, very briefly skim the reading while paying attention to the structure of the reading. Read the headings, intros, conclusions, etc. This will help you understand the skeleton of the reading.  Third, once you understand what you're reading (i.e. after completing the first two steps) your next question is: why am I reading this? Why has the professor assigned this reading? In other words, what does your professor want you, as a student, to get out of this reading for the purposes of their class? To answer these questions, look to course summaries/CANs from upper years who have taken the same course with the same professor.  Fourth, now you know what you're reading and why you're reading it. The question now here is: what does this reading say about that? If you're a person who's comfortable relying on a summary/CAN, then rely on your summaries/CANs to provide answer the answer to this question. If you're a person who's more comfortable doing the reading, then let the summaries/CANs create the signposts of what's important in the reading so you can focus on that and allocate your time effectively.  For example, if you're dealing with the topic of sexual assault in 1L criminal law, then you're probably going to want to read all of Ewanchuk and only focus on the bare essentials in every other case (e.g. R v Chase - only matters because it tells us how to interpret the sexual nature element of the AR; R v Cuerrier - only matters because it tells us when fraud vitiates consent and what L'Heureux Dube and McLachlin say in their respective dissents, respectfully, doesn't matter for the strict purpose of your exam unless your professor cares about policy; R v Mabior - only matters because it tells us when non-disclosure of HIV status vitiates consent/constitutes fraud; R v JA - only matters because it tells us to how interpret consent and, respectfully, Fish's dissent doesn't matter unless your professor cares about policy; etc)  Lectures - The purpose of lectures isn't for the professor to spoon-feed you the material, for you to practice your skills as a typist and copy the lecture verbatim or for you to get your online Christmas shopping done. The purpose of the lecture is for the professor to: Confirm to you that you're on the right track (i.e. you've done the aforementioned Reading stage correctly and understand what the topic is, why you're doing the reading, and that you know what you need to know) Clarify anything in the readings and/or correct any mistakes/things missing from your understanding/notes or the summaries/CANs you've relied on Provide you with their unique perspective/opinion/approach to the topic at hand. You're going to keep this in mind when writing your exam in order to cater to their beliefs, prejudices. For example, if you have a feminist professor, don't argue that sex work should be criminalized on an exam. Present both sides to the argument, and in one sentence say that you support it even if you don't. As a future lawyer, you're going to be arguing a lot of things you don't agree with or believe in for your own personal gain. Might as well start early   Give you any hints about the exam. Professors notice if/when the herd thins out during the school year and some times will be inclined to reward students for attending. There have been multiple times that I've gotten useful hints about exams from a professor simply for being present during a boring lecture in the middle of October Exams - Exam-writing is a skill. Learn it. Read books on how to develop the skill. My recommendation is "Law School Exams: A Guide to Better Grades" by Alex Schimel. Create your own outline. In your 5 to 15 page outline, you should have every piece of the "what you need to know" part of each of your readings. There should be absolutely no superfluous bullshit, fluff or fat on your outline. You've literally condensed the entire course into those 5 to 15 pages. Your casebook, other peoples outlines/CANs, etc were all just tools for you to arrive at your own outline.  Learn your outline cold. I mean cold. This doesn't only mean just memorizing it. You should be able to open up ExamSoft and type out the blackletter law part of your future exam answer on demand and at near-lightning speed. The only class that I actually did this properly for was the one I finished at the top (and despite missing a major issue on the exam) and the other class that I did this, but sort of half-assed, I got an A- despite writing one paragraph for a question worth 33% question because I blanked out. Once you've learned the outline cold, take a few old exam questions and do timed exams on ExamSoft. Your focus is to type out the blackletter law as you've been doing and then actually apply it to the facts. Review your answer by yourself, then with a professor (if you can reach them/they'll allow this) and finally compare against old exam answers. Many people will disagree with this but once you do a few of these timed exams, you'll start to notice repeating patterns in terms of the issues tested, answer structures, etc (there can only be so many and also many professors are creatures of habit). 
    • Had a similar thing happen: What can you tell me about person X? Should I know person X? They mentioned you in their interview... I have no idea who this person is...
×
×
  • Create New...