Jump to content
TheHonestLawyer

How is distinction calculated with the new grading system?

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I recently heard that you could finish each year with distinction if you had certain marks, but I have no clue how this is calculated. Does anyone know how one achieves distinction in a year of study at U of T law with the new grading system?

 

I know how they calculate GPA (HH=5, H=4, P=3, LP=1, F=0). If your GPA was above 4 does this get you distinction or is distinction assigned relative to the rest of the class?

 

Any information would be much appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I recently heard that you could finish each year with distinction if you had certain marks, but I have no clue how this is calculated. Does anyone know how one achieves distinction in a year of study at U of T law with the new grading system?

 

I know how they calculate GPA (HH=5, H=4, P=3, LP=1, F=0). If your GPA was above 4 does this get you distinction or is distinction assigned relative to the rest of the class?

 

Any information would be much appreciated.

 

I had in 1L (and also have now) a GPA slightly above 4 and haven't been told I have "distinction" so I guess I can tell you that it's not that.  Other than that, I have no clue how it's calculated.  I've heard that top 10% are deemed to be in Honours Standing but those are just rumours I've heard.

Edited by italia12

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the top 10% each year, calculated using the 5,4,3,2,1 system and weighted by number of credits. The old "honours" changed to "distinction" when the grades changed to "HH,H,P,LP." Hope that helps!

 

Edit: I'm not sure if you're told. It does show up in a hard to see spot on your official transcript print out.

Edited by sparkshooter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told by the faculty that it is the top 10-15%. I'm not sure how they decide to draw the cut-off line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit: I'm not sure if you're told. It does show up in a hard to see spot on your official transcript print out.

 

Sorry I should have been clearer.  When I said I wasn't "told", I should have added that I don't see it anywhere on my transcript so obviously you probably need more than a GPA of 4.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was told by the faculty that it is the top 10-15%. I'm not sure how they decide to draw the cut-off line.

 

A faculty member told me that the cut-off, as well as the percentage of the class that receives "distinction," fluctuates somewhat from year to year because they look for a place to draw the line that coincides with a natural gap in the GPA distribution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Hello, I'm in my 4th year at UofL in Calgary and currently have the following stats: CGPA: 3.21 L2: 3.53 B3: 3.32 I'm practicing the LSAT test and lowest I've had is 163. Highest I've had is 167. Work Experience: I've been working in Business Development full-time now for about 3+ years. Before that worked at a bank full-time and before that retail jobs. Always worked 30+ hours a week to support family. Reason for low CGPA is one BAD year dealing with a lot of personal problems. I know I won't get into Osgoode and UofT. But my goal is Queens. My list includes Dal, UofC, USask, Western, Ottawa and UBC. What are my chances in these schools? What about the other schools? I'm open to go to any school that takes me but would LOVE to go to Queens. and If not, then one from my list.
    • Definitely hard to say but I think I've done some considerable volunteering and leadership stuff that I really hope helps my case, but again it's really hard to know what other people applying to a holistic school look like.    I did a lil calculation and my CGPA is only like 2.9, I have some serious regrets about how I used my time in my first few years of university but not much can be done now. I am taking 4 more classes currently to bump myself but as I'm sure you know, its insanely hard to see a lot of movement. I took 4 spring/summer classes and got 4 As, it only moved my L2 GPA by 0.015. Sigh. I'm also signed up for 4 more in Winter but those aren't considered. So if all goes as planned i'll be more in the 3.6L2/3.0 CGPA range going into the 2020 cycle but obviously that doesn't help me for 2019. 

      Anyways, just trying to be as strategic as possible. Again, my expectations are not high and I'm not banking on getting in for 2019- obviously it would be a nice surprise though if I managed to claw my way in somewhere 


       
    • Sorry guys, this is probably a really stupid question but I've been working on applications all day and my brain is sufficiently fried. I'm not seeing a supporting documents deadline on the OLSAS website or the Windsor Law site. Does this mean my actual references have to be complete by November 1st, or is there an actual document deadline I'm just not seeing? Also, does anyone know what the outline for these reference letters look like? I'm trying to advise my referees on what is required but I'm having a hell of time finding out more details. 

      Thanks
    • I called OLSAS today with the same question. The asked me to get the college to send OLSAS a letter saying that they can not provide transcripts. And they said the deadline for "these sort of documents" is later than November 1st. so I shouldn't worry if it doesn't get there by November 1st.
    • Yeah, it forces you to make choices.  ie. who do you choose between: -your dream firm where you sense you did not wow them but they are lukewarm on it (can you turn things around and wow them at the dinner?) -a firm you sense was wowed by you but you are lukewarm on it (if you have a good experience at the dinner will you like it more?) -the most "prestigious" firm you interviewed for as you see it -the firm you threw in on a whim that you weren't expecting to like but find intriguing
×