Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
robsonhall36

Accepted 2013

Recommended Posts

Index score is 79, still no offer

Hopefully they received my transcripts on time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I received the email this afternoon. Self-calculated index of 77.5.

 

Did anyone else get the "error" email after? I'm not sure if the error was that they wrote "dear <first name>", or if they even sent me the email in the first place. I want to celebrate but I'm worried that I didn't actually get in! I replied to Marie's email, but I'm assuming she won't be back in the office until tomorrow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I got the error email too - I'm positive it's about the Dear error. The second email was quite clear that we're still accepted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what I think too! I just don't want to call everyone I know only to be told tomorrow that the whole message was an error. Oh well - I've been waiting months already, what's another day! Thanks for the reply!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's what I think too! I just don't want to call everyone I know only to be told tomorrow that the whole message was an error. Oh well - I've been waiting months already, what's another day! Thanks for the reply!

The second email was lighthearted And I'm pretty sure they didn't make a huge error in accidentally sending acceptances to people in their first cycle.

 

Hopefully this reassures you, even though you're a bruins fan. Marchand sucks btw

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In as well! LSAT 160, not sure what exact GPA is w/ drops but I think around 3.9/4.5

 

I got the error email as well and was nervous I was accidentally accepted, but feel better now!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Received the email this afternoon. Can't remember what my adjusted GPA would be, but my LSAT is 166 and I remember calculating my index to being ~81 or 82. Will not be accepting as I have already received an offer elsewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

any mention of the index cutoff this year?

Edited by meager

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

in, won't be accepting

 

3.7

166

 

yes the error email was talking about her leaving name instead of your actual name dont worry people

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to call tomorrow. Still seems too uncertain to let my Granny know...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
any mention of the index cutoff this year?

 

There was no mention of the index cut-off in the e-mail sent out, no.  However, given that there are some self-calculated 76.x's out there, it's possible that it may be at about the same level that (or lower than) it was last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just spoke to Marie on the phone. Those that did receive an admission email DID GET IN! The 'technical' email was in regards to the <<first_name>> part. :) Congrats everyone! 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

its a strange feeling knowing that I could not get into any other law schools in the country yet can somehow receive early admissions from the only one who would accept me.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
its a strange feeling knowing that I could not get into any other law schools in the country yet can somehow receive early admissions from the only one who would accept me.

hahaha that is kinda funny, I feel the same way...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

long time lurker. I wasn't planning on registering an account at LS except that I wanted to share this little topical anecdote. I had self calculated my index score at 77.2 so I was surprised that I didn't receive an offer from U of M, considering per this thread there were a few offers made to people with lower scores. So a couple of hours ago I emailed Marie and, much to my surprise, U of M had calculated my index score as only 76.61. Upon futher investigation (thanks to both Jody and Marie), the discrepancy arose because my graduate marks weren't incorporated into the calculation. They fixed the problem and told me that I should be sent an offer tomorrow.

 

So if anyone else is a bit perplexed as to why they haven't been accepted despite having a score that exceeds the threshold, you might be in the same boat. Doesn't hurt to fire off an email or two. Both Marie and Jody were more than happy to take a second look. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
its a strange feeling knowing that I could not get into any other law schools in the country yet can somehow receive early admissions from the only one who would accept me.

 

That's a bit surprising, as from what I've been able to tell, Manitoba isn't the easiest law school of them all, admissions-wise... places like UNB, TRU, Windsor, Saskatchewan (albeit somewhat unpredictably) and Calgary seem as though they'd be easier to get into, judging by the stats.  Presumably Lakehead won't be all that difficult, either, but... that, I suppose, remains to be seen.

 

Even with the U of A, the GPA/LSAT stats looked pretty close when I last compared them to Robson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

manitoba is certainly on the easier side for admissions if you're comparing it to calgary/alberta/sask

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • UVic dominates Victoria (obviously) but I don't think there's much, if any, difference between the two for finding work in the lower mainland at this point. I've heard as much from sessional profs at TRU who practice as lawyers in downtown Vancouver. @tallandkeepingllp I would accept the UVic offer. Half the tuition and improved mental health by being closer to home is totally worth it. And I'm a TRU alum who loved it there.
    • My original thoughts were that I would be staying at home and doing the online learning instead of moving to Kingston. I tend to err on the side of caution and I'm just not sure if I want to risk in person classes yet. Many of those close to me are higher risk, so that probably played a large part in my initial decision.   This is really interesting and it makes me wonder if my original decision is really the right one to make. If I moved to Kingston, I would theoretically be away from my higher risk family (barring visits, which might not even be a good idea). Me staying at home would carry the benefits of saving a year of rent money (a big plus, imo) and potentially being safer in terms of the virus. I should note that even I'm not yet a member of this Facebook group, so there may be a larger population of students who plan to stay home that aren't reflected in this survey. I do wonder if I would miss out on part of the experience though, but if it's only going to be a "partial" experience to begin with, I'm not sure if I can justify the extra rent costs (on top of tuition) along with the potentially extra virus risk. I just hope I wouldn't be disadvantaged in any way compared to the rest of the class. I really do hope that Queen's will be able to maintain an even footing for those who stay at home and those who can make it in person. I know Queen's intends to offer full online learning, but maybe someone with more experience/ or who is already enrolled at Queen's can weigh in on the potential pros/cons of the in person experience vs. the hypothetical online experience that we're all being faced with right now.
    • Hi all, I was waitlisted this cycle and recently went to check the status of my application. I am unable to log in because the site tries to direct me through an @uwindsor.ca email address made with my name which I don't have the password for and have never seen before. I'm planning on sending an email out on Monday just to see what's going on but figured I'd check to see if anyone else is currently experiencing the same thing. Perhaps it's just an issue stemming from a new site update or something. Thanks in advance!   
    • No, marks over 90% require special permission, but marks up to 90% can be awarded without permission.
    • Isn't the max at Allard 90% anyways? And even then, the prof will need special permission or file some kind of paperwork. I know people who got 90s.

×
×
  • Create New...