Jump to content
emcmilla

Question for current law students: tattoos!

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

I will be attending the U of S College of law in September and wondered if any current students have tattoos. How does this affect (or does it) law student life and interviewing for jobs? (Obviously I would cover it up as best as I could). I have a tattoo of the scales of justice on my ankle and a small heart and crossbones on my wrist.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously? Scales of Justice on your ankle before 1L? Man, are you going to feel dumb if this career direction doesn't work out for you ...

 

To your question. I suspect you'll get widely divergent answers here and elsewhere even from experienced lawyers based on differences in practice area, social circles, and generation. The law is a very diverse profession. So the reactions you'll get from lawyers and law students will vary widely as a result.

 

In my experience, if personal features that are outside the norm (tattoos, unusual hair length/color, dress style, etc.) genuinely fit your character then it probably won't limit you in the long run. Yes, that guy with the leather jacket and the long hair probably stands out in the class. Then again, because of the long hair and the dress style he's probably the kind of guy who'll end up doing criminal defense or something. And those guys? A fair number have long hair, dress differently, etc.

 

Some law students may get this and some may not. The ones that don't ... who cares. You'll relate to a natural peer group, make connections with people who share your interests, etc. That's natural enough.

 

My only concern is if you want to do something corporate and mainstream despite your signals. If that's the case, you might want to think about removing the tattoo on your wrist at least. I don't say that lightly, because if that's who you are that's who you are. But if you want to be that mainstream corporate lawyer, that comes with looking mainstream. It's all a question of where you're looking to take this.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about U of S (perhaps it draws a different crowd than the West Coast?) but there are a ton of people with tattoos at UVic, including very visible ones. There are also lots of lawyers and law students with tattoos at the place I worked this summer. I have a tattoo on my leg that was visible during OCIs and it didn't stop me from getting interviews.

 

It doesn't sound like either of your tattoos are very large. I wouldn't worry about the ankle one as much; the wrist is more in-your-face (and less common, as ankle tattoos are everywhere these days) and I would consider whether you can cover it for interviews, either by wearing long-sleeve shirts (to cover anything not already covered by the edge of your blazer), and perhaps having a wider watch strap? This would mostly be so that you could suss out during in-firm interviews whether it would be totally anathema to the firm environment to have such a thing, and then pick places where you think you'd be okay to have such an item.

 

My understanding of current tattoo removal technology is that you could be left with an unsightly blob rather than a small heart and crossbones, and that the procedure would be hella expensive and painful considering that tattoos have become increasingly mainstream and may become even more acceptable, even in corporate/mainstream law, as a younger, tattoo-having generation moves up the ranks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a tattoo on my leg that was visible during OCIs and it didn't stop me from getting interviews.

 

How does this happen? Were you wearing shorts?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ that was my thought process as well. It felt good to get instant gratification to my mental-question haha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoops. It seems I've not only checked out at work I've also checked out online.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's okay. I am basically one of four women on the internet. It's hard to remember we exist sometimes... :wink:

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To the OP - I don't think a little wrist tat will hold you back, even in the corp/mainstream firms. Wear long sleeves and don't worry about it.

 

Also, this is surely obvious, but don't mention/apologize for it in the interview. Drawing attention to it *will* be a negative. I was interviewing someone once and they felt the need to apologize for their ear spacers (as in, earring holes that had been stretched to the size of peas) -- it's something I never would have noticed, but couldn't stop thinking about it for the rest of the interview.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

I will be attending the U of S College of law in September and wondered if any current students have tattoos. How does this affect (or does it) law student life and interviewing for jobs? (Obviously I would cover it up as best as I could). I have a tattoo of the scales of justice on my ankle and a small heart and crossbones on my wrist.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated!

 

Thanks

 

Don't get a face or neck tattoo, and I'm sure you'll be fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Confirmation, if anyone needed it: I am a woman, and I was wearing a skirt.

 

I was assuming that the OP was a woman too (on the basis that the ankle tattoo would otherwise be a non-issue, as unfortunately SaulGoodman's kilt-suit hasn't taken off yet in legal circles); if that's the case, and if you are sensitive about the ankle tattoo you could of course wear a pantsuit. I happen to dislike them, but that's a comment for another discussion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For interviews, it's just an overall safe bet to cover up. If you get the position, you can get a feel of the firm's culture to see if it's acceptable or not. Granted, I haven't worked at a law firm yet, but I've worked at business firms where one demanded full business attire (I would not show a tat there), but the other one didn't seem to have a problem with co-workers showing them with rolled-up sleeves in a subtle manner. If it's a small one that can't always be covered up, I wouldn't call attention to it, since there are plenty of people out there with body marks the same size (and who would want to scan for those?)

 

I would hope that there's no trouble from your classmates, and I wouldn't want to hang out with prudes who would judge you by your tattoos (OK, maybe a swastika on your forehead would be an exception.) I don't have any myself, but I love engaging others who have them in a discussion about them. I've wanted one ever since I started undergrad, but I can't trust myself to be decisive enough and settle on something I'll be happy with in 5 years.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously? Scales of Justice on your ankle before 1L? Man, are you going to feel dumb if this career direction doesn't work out for you ...

 

 

Scales of Justice do not just represent a legal career, in fact, it could just represent a deep connection or desire to justice, fairness and balance...

 

Thanks for everyone's input and opinion. I am glad that not all answers were questioning the type of tattoo I have and making uninformed comments about the meaning surrounding them.

Edited by emcmilla
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Scales of Justice do not just represent a legal career, in fact, it could just represent a deep connection or desire to justice, fairness and balance...

 

I just assumed you were a Libra and really, really into the Zodiac.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've summered and will be articling at a relatively large Saskatchewan firm, and I know a few lawyers there with tattoos. I also know a few law students with tattoos (though none that would be visible when wearing a suit). I'll most likely end up in the corporate/commercial group, and I fully intend to get serious ink done when I can afford to get something huge done. Like a kraken taking down a ship! Awesome!!

 

I actually used to have a large piercing before starting law school, and I took it out the week before because I thought I was going to have to go 100% clean-cut, straight-laced conservative businessman. Definitely not the case. I'm starting to seriously consider a wrist tattoo myself actually.

 

Cover it up in an interview just to be safe, and otherwise just enjoy being dope!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes, obviously I understand that the missing row changes the acceptance rate rather than the number of applications.  The number of applications piece of the equation seems credible, but the Oxford spreadsheet is too sloppy to trust the other side of the equation (i.e. the number of seats).
    • No matter what the number of seats provided by UofA are missing from the calculation above, it will change the acceptance odds to be greater than my original estimate (somewhere around 40%).  With respect to definition of "application", check the last page of the statistical chart and you can tell the applicants are defined under the context of "academic year", which refers to applicants for law school application instead of for writing LSAT (we all know LSAT itself doesn't involve the concept of academic years although it is used for applications under certain academic year). So I have no doubts in believing the 6745 applicants are accurate number of people applying Canada's law schools for this year as of now subject to following terms (as copied from the LSAT): • These data are displayed by Academic Year, which is the same as the law school enrollment year. For example, academic year 2018 or 2018-2019 would indicate the academic year beginning in the fall of 2018 and extending into spring 2019. • The Current Volume data tables include applicants for all academic terms. Current Volume reports published before 2018 summarized applicants for the fall term only and are not comparable to these new volume reports. • ABA data reflect applicants and applications for ABA-approved law schools. • Deferrals are not included in either the ABA or Canadian data. Deferrals are defined as "applicants admitted for a prior term who were granted a postponed enrollment to the current term." • Please note as defined in this report, an applicant is a candidate who submits one or more applications for any academic term. • The data for this report are updated every evening and will reflect current volumes as of that time. • This report is best viewed in Chrome, Edge, Internet Explorer, or Safari.
    • Hopefully the interview works out for you, you deserve it. 
    • Of course I'm getting gowned, but I want to wear a skirt with it instead of trousers and so I wanted to know the protocol as nylons, tights, etc. part isn't published on the law society page for the apparel and I think it may be hot in the June call. 
    • I disagree. If you had spent that $1000 last year to apply to a school that might have accepted you this year, then you wouldn't be paying for another application cycle, LSAT attempt, etc. Also, suppose this year you didn't apply to Queen's and UofT and ended up doing really well on the LSAT, your loss. So you're buying both the opportunity and safety net by spending more at the outset. $1000 also seems pretty high, I think I paid half that for 5 schools. Logic Games is the best section to be the worst at because it's very formulaic and predictable. There's really only 3 different game designs to know.  That might be it. In fact, my first unsuccessful personal statement made this same mistake as I took a law-related major. It's fine to mention your career goals and why, but I expect you went overboard like I did.  Do better on the LSAT. You're right there and the margins are that thin. 1 point can and does make the difference
×
×
  • Create New...