Jump to content
acanadianpeanut

Good Looks=Success in Law?

Recommended Posts

Well, HumanUnit, I guess we can't all have the extraordinary amounts of spare time that it takes to rack up 416 posts...

 

But we'll try, we'll try...

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lordgoogly-

 

 

 

ah live journal flame wars.

 

 

 

cheers to you for getting a livejournal reference onto ezboard.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much laphroaig.

 

At last, someone who can read what I actually wrote.

 

 

 

Cheeks, sorry for the spelling mistake. My crappy English is probbly why I scored 174 instead of 180. :b

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Cheeks, sorry for the spelling mistake. My crappy English is probbly why I scored 174 instead of 180"

 

 

 

no one cares about your LSAT score. hth.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought because you cared about how I spelled 'comprehensive', you'd also care about my LSAT score.

 

 

 

P.S. I just washed my dishes.

 

 

 

HTH

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"no one cares about your LSAT score. hth."

 

 

 

who's to know what you care about? you seem to care about the most trivial things... like how I spell "comprehensive" for instance.

 

 

 

Based on that, I thought that you might also care about some other idiotic thing. Like that I just washed my dishes.

 

 

 

Get it? :rolleyes hth

 

 

 

P.S. adcom at HLS sure cared about my score.

 

 

 

PAW3D

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

no one cares about HLS either. sorry man - I'm sure your parents are proud of you though.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

give it a rest guys,

 

 

 

its silly to have this kind of exchange. It doesn't help anyone and it proves nothing. In my view, the exchange previously, was less of a flame-war than a vigorous debate on a pointed issue that received some good attention from many members.

 

 

 

That said, lets have respect for one another and keep in mind that the best recipe for those who we deem to be immature or abrasive, is just to ignore them!

 

 

 

I wish I could recall a pithy saying about a tar pit and some analogy to mutually destructive pejoratives, but sadly, my memory is failing me in my old age.

 

 

 

:rollin

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with Cheeks and Sean plus:

 

 

 

You got into Harvard huh? I'm sure you got a 174...

 

 

 

Liar.

 

 

 

Ha, ha... this board's hilarious.

 

 

 

Sorry Laphroaig, just couldn't resist.

 

 

Edited by: LawPlayer at: 3/29/05 12:09 am

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SeantheScientician:

 

man, no one has a sense of humour around here. yes, I do actually know how to spell probbly.

 

 

 

ok. the end.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn, and I wanted to end it.

 

 

 

LawPlayer: It's beyond your imagination to get into HLS eh? I feel sorry for you. Let me give you a tip and some hope. Getting into any school besides YLS is a numbers game. Even you can do it. Maybe try transferring next year?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Elpinio, you're a joker. Never said its beyond my imagination to get into HLS. I just know that you didn't get in. I know who you are my friend.

 

 

 

Where do you come up with these things from. I really feel sorry for you having to lie to a bunch of people you don't even know, and who don't even like you for that matter. Get off the board. I don't need your tips. Enough of this, Laphroaig is right, no need to respond to you any more.

 

 

 

Good luck.

 

 

 

Cheeks, i'm having so much fun on this board.

 

 

Edited by: LawPlayer at: 3/29/05 2:19 am

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That is definitely what I do - draft my closing first, with all the law, and all the evidence I anticipate getting or that I have, and then craft my crosses and direct if applicable to adduce that evidence. I have never done small claims court, but even in a crazy provincial court trial, I will never ask an open-ended question where I am not confident what the response will be, or where I know it will not hurt me whatever it is. I think this is different for the Crown than for defence because yes, the Crown may have reluctant witnesses with no statement. Any witness I call, I have vetted, and when I am crossing Crown witnesses, even if there was no statement, I've had the benefit of their direct. And maybe I'm about to ambush the Crown with their texts or something. I would never be flying completely blind for  a cross. The less I know, the tighter and more leading my questions are. I don't know how this translates to small claims.  I will add that sometimes the best cross is no cross. If a reluctant witness completely hung themself on direct, a dramatic "I have no questions for this witness, Your Honour" is very effective. Don't give them a chance to rehabilitate themself because you feel you have to cross, or you want to make hay and indulge yourself over all the stupid things they said in direct. Likewise, if they start hanging themself on cross, you might not have to finish every single question on your sheet because you have enough, and knowing when to quit and sit down is an important skill that will impress the judge.     
    • I was asked for them by many firms and for clerkships, for what it's worth. I don't know how important they were or were not.
    • Very unimportant to most firms. Some NY firms care about undergrad grades, but no Canadian firms put much weight on them. They never even came up for me during the 1L recruit, and my grades weren’t stellar.  The exception may be if you’re relying on a STEM degree to open IP doors. 
    • During the 2L hiring process (formal and otherwise), how important are undergrad grades? I ask because I had one semester in which I performed very poorly in three courses because I had some background (documented) medical issues I was dealing with + family issues. I anticipate that some doors will be closed, but I'm trying to calibrate my expectations right now by getting a sense of how many doors are closed. Also, these grades are an aberration in the context of my whole undergrad and my LS grades are okay (top 40-35% in 1L).
    • Yeah, sometimes when you're in the wild world of provincial court trials, with a reluctant witness who has never given a statement, I'm forced to ask questions I don't know the answer to.  But be aware that you're doing it, know that it can blow up on you, and be prepared to live with it. For all the bad mouthing small claims court can get, I did find that if you came in with a serious case and representation on both sides the court just loved you for it.  On two separate occasions I ran 2 day trials, complete with experts.  I think it was just so different than what they usually see the court just took everything very seriously.
×