Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

52 Decent People

About thesizzlingwok

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I'm not well-versed in McGill's admissions process so I can't speak to it very much. However, more broadly, the point I was looking to make is that some schools have an "access" admissions application in which you can provide some context to the extenuating circumstances that caused your subpar grades. This could be grief, illness, victim of a crime, etc. It is quite a broad category and it is still very competitive, but it sounds like you've really become engaged in your community and worked really hard and the only thing on paper holding you back is your GPA, so maybe I'd look into McGill's admissions more and see if they have an access category or something like it, or if they don't, possibly open up your options a bit more and look into a school nearby or that fits your criteria of what you're looking for and apply there! McGill is a great school, but you'll receive a great legal education wherever you go, but I understand if you're looking to learn civil law that it narrows your options, but if unfortunately McGill is unaccommodating to your GPA circumstances going elsewhere would be a great alternative!
  2. Focus your energy on L2 or B2 schools and try and absolutely decimate your LSAT. Over a four year period there's so many classes that contribute to your CGPA that getting a couple extra good grades will bring it up from a 2.95 to a 3.05 etc. - it's marginal at best. However, dedicating your time to the LSAT and scoring three, five, ten points higher opens way more doors. If you get around 163+ the and maintain a 3.7-3.8 you'll be in decent competitive standings for L2/B2, plus, you can tailor your PS to maybe how your interest in school came around after first year when you decided you wanted to dedicate yourself to getting a legal education. And if you absolutely manhandle the LSAT are nearing the 170 mark they won't even care about your CGPA if your L2/B2 is on par.
  3. I recall your last post (and I recall commenting) and it sounds like you'd really like to branch away from UofS which is totally fair! As others have echoed, I'd finish my BA - I'm so so happy I did, this is my last sem and I've been longing for Law for about a year now and I know that it's 200% what I want to do. Your stats are really good and you definitely seem like you can keep them up, and like others have said, with some stats like yours and a completed BA you'll be good to have your pick of schools. Also too (I feel like I said this on your last post, but) being young isn't necessarily an advantage I've learned. I was very keen to go into Law after my 2nd year but frankly I was unprepared for the LSAT at that time, so my decision was kinda made for me, but after spending some more time in undergrad and doing law related EC's I learned how being young may not truly be an advantage. Yes, it is less time in school, and yes it seems like a feat to do the same thing before everyone else, but when it comes to getting a job and going into OCI's or looking for articles, you'll be substantially younger then your peers and what that can reflect may not actually be strengths. Not sure if you'll be apart of this group, but there is some stigma hovering over K-JD's (I'll be one as well, but what can ya do) and whether they have enough diverse and mature lived experiences yet, as well as younger graduates are less likely to have families, mortgages, or other responsibilities anchoring them to a certain place ensuring employers that their new hire or articling student is here to stay. So the extra year or two of undergrad to give you a couple letters to strengthen your application, and bolster you as an adult may put you in a way better position to a) pick whatever school you want, and b) land wherever you want a more mature rounded applicant.
  4. Being that you could apply as a mature applicant, in which they may take your CGPA with a grain of salt and look past it your chances may not be too bad. Getting your LSAT up would definitely improve your chances. Any idea where you'd apply or where you'd want to attend?
  5. Ya your LSAT is a little low, a CGPA a touch low but overall decent stats, how are your extra's/references?
  6. You may have quoted the wrong person lol, but now I'm intrigued - did you only apply to Osgoode?
  7. Are you in queue/under eval at all of them? What are your stats like?
  8. There's a thread that says Accepted 2019, those are the people who have been in, but to answer your question, yes, people have heard back
  9. Ya you're right! I'm still in queue and have been since early Jan and my stats are leaps and bounds lower than 3.63/170
  10. If @criss990 doesn't get in I say we do a Rudy-esque jersey forfeit to the admissions office.
  11. Ya I gotta agree with you - it's hard to even call that "below" the median, especially with a banging LSAT. Like yes, "splitters" have offsetting grades and LSAT but we can't even call @criss990 a splitter in this case because of the .09 GPA difference and the very strong LSAT
  12. No difference, just wondering where I should keep an eye on!
  13. Ya like you'd think that it means we have better chances but the way Osgoode talks about their waitlist and the trends in past years of April acceptances sounds like its almost better to be waitlisted.
  • Create New...