Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

656 Good People

About beyondsection17

  • Rank

Recent Profile Visitors

2144 profile views
  1. beyondsection17

    First trial tips?

    I'm not saying that you shouldn't be prepared and organized and polite, or that you should cause delays and be arrogant. I don't think I've ever said that. What I did say is that you shouldn't expect to lean on the Rules or use them to your advantage, and likewise, you shouldn't anticipate that your opponent will be expected to follow the Rules, or that they will be admonished for not following the Rules, regardless of whether they have counsel.
  2. beyondsection17

    First trial tips?

    The other side of this pancake is that you shouldn't feel too upset regardless of what happens. Small Claims is basically kangaroo court; you can prepare, and you can be right at law, and you can still lose. It's not (necessarily) a reflection on you, and more a reflection on the nature of the fact scenario and small claims in general. The other good advice I got when I was articling is to run the trial as though you're preparing for an inevitable appeal. Get the evidence you need in, make sure your position is correct in law, and that way, if you get a wacky deputy judge who doesn't follow the law, you're all set to appeal (if that's what your client wants to do).
  3. beyondsection17

    First trial tips?

    I've done a couple small claims trials, and IMHO, the most important thing to remember is that you cannot expect the court to give a shit about the rules of civil procedure or evidence. The Plaintiff isn't calling her treating doctors to testify and wants to just enter their records without you getting a chance to cross-examine them? Boom plaintiff wins! If you want to cross-examine someone, you have to put them under summons, regardless of the fact that it's the plaintiff's burden to prove his or her case. Other than that, I'd give the same advice that everyone else gave. Figure out what your theory of the case is, figure out what submissions you want to make, parse out what evidence you'll need to have in support of those submissions, and then draft your questions to elicit that evidence.
  4. beyondsection17

    Upper Year Summaries?

    I'm a lawyer now and no longer have the link to the summary dropbox handy. I would recommend asking a current student.
  5. beyondsection17

    Are lawyers still using typewriters?

    I figured the distinction these days was between "clerks" and "assistants". Though, I know there are some places which call all the support staff "legal assistants" regardless of the fact that they're all actually law clerks (much to their chagrin).
  6. beyondsection17

    Are lawyers still using typewriters?

    We have a typewriter in our office. I've never personally seen it used, or heard of it being used, but they did just throw out the old typewriter in favour of a new(er) one, so obviously someone is using it for something.
  7. I wouldn't recommend using this tone in your application to Western Law.
  8. beyondsection17

    1L Schedule

    Guys this topic is adorable. Also, bear in mind that we didn't have OTLATLS when I was in 1L, but how are you supposed to brief a case before starting law school? I find it hard to believe you'd be able to isolate the ratio or any comments in obiter when you're completely fresh to the concept.
  9. beyondsection17

    Need Guidance: Articles Complete/ Bar Exams Incomplete?

    They'll allow you to work as an articling student on an extension past your 10 months under a "supervision agreement", but there's a stipulation that in most cases you can only do it for up to 4 months or until the next call to the bar. From the LSUC website:
  10. beyondsection17

    Articling options under consideration

    In my opinion, articling is necessary. I do not believe the skills you learn in articling can be taught through online simulation, and I do not believe they can be adequately assessed by a multiple choice exam. I think it is valuable to have individual lawyers training other individual lawyers in the skills and values that (ought to be) associated with being a member of this profession. Personally, I would be all for an option that removes the LPP, returns to the articling-only framework, and that incentives firms to take on students by offering a waiver of the CPD requirements, discounted fees, or something of that sort. I recognize that I was privileged to have an articling position that actually prepared me for practice, and that not all articling positions are created equal, but I don't believe the baby ought to be thrown out with the bathwater.
  11. beyondsection17

    Western vs Osgoode

    Oh. Wow. I didn't even notice that this discussion was purely academic. My bad. The Ultra Vires numbers don't indicate that Osgoode gives any advantage on Bay St as compared to Western. Also, Bernard works on Bay St. He's probably more familiar with Bay St hiring than any of us are.
  12. beyondsection17

    Western vs Osgoode

    I would consider this point to be included in "Western is farther away from Toronto than Osgoode". Look, my post was not to suggest that you, yourself, went to the wrong law school. It was to provide my perspective, as a lawyer, for the OP. I went to Western, and work in Toronto. I did not find that the location of my law school mattered at all for hiring purposes. I work with some lawyers who went to Western, and others who went to Osgoode, and a number who went to other law schools in Ontario and across the country, and I am friends with a wide variety of lawyers across different practice areas who all graduated from different schools, and unsurprisingly, the law schools we all went to is a topic that rarely seems to come up. My whole point was that you'll be fine wherever you go. You'll also be fine even if you don't end up working on Bay St. Just follow your gut.
  13. beyondsection17

    Western vs Osgoode

    Between Osgoode and Western, it doesn't matter where you go. Really. Really really. The discussion boils down to this: Osgoode's class size is 2x the size of Western's. Neither is better than the other for "Bay Street hiring". Osgoode has more of a social justice focus than Western. Western has (slightly) cheaper tuition than Osgoode. Western is farther away from Toronto than Osgoode. The notion that you will spend your time in law school ~networking~ on the street with lawyers, and that being in Toronto and closer to these people will therefore yield you a benefit for hiring, is a false one. The ~*prestige*~ associated with Osgoode stems from a time when it was the only law school in Canada and held classes at the actual Osgoode Hall. Even Osgoode alumni will tell you there is absolutely no comparison between the Osgoode of 1960 and the Osgoode of 2018. The only people who aren't aware of this are people who aren't in law school yet, and also maybe the current Osgoode students who have convinced themselves otherwise. Advice: Go to law school in Ontario. Wherever you want. Become a lawyer. Look back on this thread in four years and laugh.
  14. beyondsection17

    Articling -sole practitioner - salary range

    I think it was fairly clear what I was suggesting. If I had a dime for every 1L I met who "wasn't bothered by the articling crisis" (either because of their delusions of grandeur about their odds at the 2L recruit, or their inflated egos from having secured a 1L job at Blakes or SK), I'd have paid off my student loans by now.
  15. beyondsection17

    Articling -sole practitioner - salary range

    .....Didn't you just finish 1L?